Awesome, thanks, I'm preparing the announcement e-mail.
Regards
JB
On 20/09/2019 15:57, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> website has been updated
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robbie,
>>
>> It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault
website has been updated
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it
> won't happen for next one for sure ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > As I said I w
Hi Robbie,
It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it
won't happen for next one for sure ;)
Regards
JB
On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just
> thought in case that wasnt the situation it wou
So far as I know the published website is based only on the git repo
now, and the old svn repo would have no effect on it. Looking at
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/ suggests that is true as
theres no signof 5.15.10 files, so I think your PR needs to include
those changes also. I'm surprise
As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just
thought in case that wasnt the situation it would be helpful to ensure
you knew the website updates can be / normally are pushed directly, to
hopefully help avoid the release publishing process going past the 3
week mark.
Robbie
Hi,
website PR is ready:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/12
I also pushed the schema (xsd and html with signatures) directly on
website production svn.
Regards
JB
On 19/09/2019 20:41, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> Good point Robbie, any committer should be able to push since it'
Hi,
as ASF member, I can even push directly on repo. However, I prefer to
"four eyes" validation, and not acting as lonesome cowboy ;)
That's why I asked at least Christopher to review (not necessary
push/publish).
It's not a question of karma but community respect.
Regards
JB
On 19/09/2019 17
Good point Robbie, any committer should be able to push since it's just
another git project. But either way I'm happy to review a PR.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:40 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before
> publishing, hence raising a PR.
Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before
publishing, hence raising a PR...but just in case, note that unlike
the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to
the website.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> @Chris,
Sure, no problem, I can take care of that when you are ready.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the
> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will
> send the announce
Hi,
@Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the
website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will
send the announcement email when website is ok.
Regards
JB
On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just to let you know that
Hi guys,
just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume
website update and announcement today and tomorrow.
Regards
JB
On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote:
> Thanks for the update Chris.
> +1
>
> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré ()
> escribió:
Thanks for the update Chris.
+1
El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré ()
escribió:
> Hi Chris,
>
> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy).
>
> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon.
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> Regards
> JB
Hi Chris,
yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy).
The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon.
Sorry for the delay.
Regards
JB
On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Are you still working on updating the website an
Jean-Baptiste,
Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release email?
It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is
finished and it's been almost 2 weeks.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> this vote passed with
Hi guys,
this vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish,
Michael Pearce
+1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré,
Jamie Goodyear
I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and
publi
+1 (binding)
Validated checksum and signatures on binaries
Deployed on windows host, and ran some basic tests with openwire client
Also checked rebuild from tag
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:41 PM +0100, "Jamie G."
wrote:
+1 (non-
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Jamie
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 3:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Casting my own +1.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes depende
Casting my own +1.
Regards
JB
On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
> https://issues.apach
+1 (non-binding)Thanks!regards,FrancoisEnvoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung
Galaxy.
Message d'origine De : Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Date : 28/08/2019 12:21 (GMT+01:00) À :
dev@activemq.apache.org Objet : [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take
#4) Hi guys,I'm
On 8/28/19 6:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:08 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding).
> >
> > Colm.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:24 PM Christopher Shannon <
> > christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
+1
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:59 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Colm.
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:24 PM Christopher Shannon <
> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1, this one looks good to me
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
+1 (non-binding).
Colm.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 3:24 PM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, this one looks good to me
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
+1, this one looks good to me
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:21 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
>
>
> https://i
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12345171
The Maven staging repositor
Hi,
due to identified AMQ-7292, I cancel this vote to fix it.
Sorry about that.
Regards
JB
On 26/08/2019 22:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
>
> Please take a l
So actually the more I think about it, I don't know that we should even be
upgrading Jetty from 9.2.x to 9.4.x in a minor release. That seems more
like a 5.16.0 thing. That's a big Jetty upgrade and as we have seen might
cause a lot of issues with compatibility (especially people using an
embedde
Here's a PR that fixes the problem:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/391
Colm.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:51 AM Christopher Shannon <
christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed the same thing with the webconsole and was about to -1 for that.
>
> If you update versions of Jetty yo
I noticed the same thing with the webconsole and was about to -1 for that.
If you update versions of Jetty you need to really test out all parts that
use it...unit tests, websockets, HTTP transport, webconsole, TLS support,
etc as a lot of things seemed to be changed between Jetty versions that ar
The cause is a missing ecj jar. I'm preparing a PR now.
Colm.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:12 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh
wrote:
> When I try to log on to the web console there is an error in the logs:
>
> javax.servlet.ServletException: javax.servlet.ServletException:
> org.apache.jasper.JasperExcept
When I try to log on to the web console there is an error in the logs:
javax.servlet.ServletException: javax.servlet.ServletException:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No Java
compiler available for configuration options compilerClassName: [null] and
compiler: [n
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12345171
The Maven staging repositor
Hi,
due to http test error and missing jbonofre key in KEYS file, I cancel
this release.
I will cut a new one tonight.
Regards
JB
On 25/08/2019 10:15, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes dependency updates,
I have added it in two locations:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/KEYS
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/KEYS
Once you revert the release commits on 5.15.x you can cherry-pick my commit
for your key from master into the branch:
https://github.com/apache/activemq/
Yeah, it's the correct one.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 26/08/2019 16:25, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> You might need to be PMC to do it so I will try. I found your key here so
> I will grab it: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/karaf/KEYS
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Jean-Baptiste
You might need to be PMC to do it so I will try. I found your key here so
I will grab it: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/karaf/KEYS
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I tried to update the KEYS file on dist.apache.org, but it's weird, I
> do
Hi Chris,
I tried to update the KEYS file on dist.apache.org, but it's weird, I
don't have the permission:
activemq-dist-release/KEYS' is forbidden by the server
Can you please give the permission to me or add my key in KEYS file ?
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 26/08/2019 13:05, Christopher Shannon w
Hi,
Oh, thanks for pointing. It's weird as the PullRequest worked.
Regards
JB
On 26/08/2019 16:04, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> Hey JB,
>
> The Jetty upgrade caused the HTTP tests to fail. I'm preparing a PR to fix
> this:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Java
Hey JB,
The Jetty upgrade caused the HTTP tests to fail. I'm preparing a PR to fix this:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Java8/1310/
Colm.
On 2019/08/25 08:15:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
Unfortunately I think I need to -1 again. I don't see your key in the KEYS
file which is important to verify signatures obviously. See
https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keys-policy
The file we maintain our keys is
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/KEYS and also you need
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12345171
The Maven staging repositor
Hi
My bad I will fix that. I thought we use a global schema version as I do
in Karaf (or camel).
I also saw that scm should be updated to gitbox.
I'm fixing both.
Regards
JB
Le 24 août 2019 15:09, Christopher Shannon
a écrit :
-1
It looks like step 1 of the release guide was not com
Due to xsd update missing, I cancel this vote and I will submit a new one.
Sorry about that.
Regards
JB
Le 24 août 2019 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Also the release artifacts were not properly staged here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/
That is step 11 of the release guide
You don't need to worry about the Javadoc or site plugin stuff until after
the vote passes ( step 9 and 10) They can be moved to after the vote
-1
It looks like step 1 of the release guide was not completed to add the
5.15.10 schema references in both the META-INF/spring.schemas
and activemq-osgi/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.schemas files. As I
posted earlier the guide is here:
https://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html
This i
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks JB!
regards,
François
fpa...@apache.org
Le 24/08/2019 à 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
>
> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
>
> Please take a look on the Release Notes
Hi guys,
I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12345171
The staging repository is:
48 matches
Mail list logo
