Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-07-06 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Just a quick update about website update and announcement. I had an issue with Jekyll on my machine. It seems to work again now, so I will update website and announce soon. Sorry for the delay. Regards JB > Le 1 juil. 2020 à 12:31, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > This

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-07-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi everyone, This vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, JB Onofré, Michael Pearce, Dan Kulp, Arthur Naseef +1 (non binding): Matt Pavlovich, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear I’m promoting the artifacts on dist and maven central, update Jira, create the branch

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-07-01 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi, As said yesterday, I gonna close the vote, just waiting a new test that passed for me. So, yes, the vote will be close now. Regards JB > Le 1 juil. 2020 à 12:19, Christopher Shannon > a écrit : > > JB, > > I think we should close the vote, it has been 6 days now so time to get the >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-07-01 Thread Christopher Shannon
JB, I think we should close the vote, it has been 6 days now so time to get the release out. On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Awesome ! Thanks for your feedback Art ! > > I gonna close the vote and move forward. > > Thanks again ! > > Regards > JB > > > Le 30 juin

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Awesome ! Thanks for your feedback Art ! I gonna close the vote and move forward. Thanks again ! Regards JB > Le 30 juin 2020 à 17:32, Arthur Naseef a écrit : > > +1 > > JB: very good - thanks for the feedback. > > Build is successful with no problems beyond the warning mentioned earlier -

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-30 Thread Arthur Naseef
+1 JB: very good - thanks for the feedback. Build is successful with no problems beyond the warning mentioned earlier - first time in a very long time that I've had a fully successful build in one shot - very nice. License notifications appear to be on most files. Several readme.txt files

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-30 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi That’s a warning present for a very long time. I already prepared the update to maven-bundle-plugin 4.2.1 allowing us to build using JDK 11 (targeted for ActiveMQ 5.17.0). This warning also exists on activemq-5.15.x branch for very very long time. So, no blocker, and I already fix that.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Arthur Naseef
I'm building now. Don't know how quickly it'll get done, so I won't be surprised if the vote is closed before then. There is an error in making the activemq-client bundle - any thoughts on this? [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.3.7:bundle (default-bundle) @ activemq-client ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1, simple building and running basic tests looks OK -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://talend.com > On Jun 25, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Jamie G.
+1 (non-binding) Cheers, Jamie On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Agree, I don’t see it as a blocker. > > Regards > JB > > > Le 29 juin 2020 à 15:10, Christopher Shannon > > a écrit : > > > > If not critical I say we can continue with 5.16.0 as it needs to go out

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Agree, I don’t see it as a blocker. Regards JB > Le 29 juin 2020 à 15:10, Christopher Shannon > a écrit : > > If not critical I say we can continue with 5.16.0 as it needs to go out and > bas been delayed way too long and target a fix for that test for 5.16.1 > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:37

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Christopher Shannon
If not critical I say we can continue with 5.16.0 as it needs to go out and bas been delayed way too long and target a fix for that test for 5.16.1 On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:37 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > Hmm, let me try on my machine (as the build passed during the release > process). >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hmm, let me try on my machine (as the build passed during the release process). Thanks for the test. Regards JB > Le 29 juin 2020 à 12:12, Gary Tully a écrit : > > +0 > > doing: mvn install on the source bundle, after about 6 attempts it > gets through all but one test: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-29 Thread Gary Tully
+0 doing: mvn install on the source bundle, after about 6 attempts it gets through all but one test: activemq-karaf-itest ActiveMQBrokerFeatureTest.testSendReceiveWeb:122->produceMessageWebConsole:106 post succeeded, POST

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Casting my own +1 (binding) Regards JB > Le 25 juin 2020 à 16:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi everyone, > > Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 > release to your vote (take #2). > > This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Michael André Pearce
+1 (Binding) Using release binary Ran some nms openwire smoke tests Ran some jms openwire smoke tests Validated checksums Sent from my iPad > On 25 Jun 2020, at 17:45, Christopher Shannon > wrote: > > +1, looks good to me > > * Validated signatures and checksums > * Verified

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Francois Papon
+1 (non-binding) - Tested with Java11 runtime - Validated with some local projects Thanks JB for this release! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 25/06/2020 à 16:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1, looks good to me * Validated signatures and checksums * Verified license headers on source using 'mvn apache-rat:check' * Ran smoke tests * Verified broker starts properly using tar.gz release * Verified several of my own tests that I have pass successfully On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:58 AM

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Matt Pavlovich
+1 Thank you, JB! * Downloaded apache-activemq-5.16.0-unix.tar.gz and validated SHA1 sum * Tested startup / shutdown * Various message testing -Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 25, 2020, at 9:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Now that we fixed the ASF header issue,

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)

2020-06-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi everyone, Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release to your vote (take #2). This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK 11. The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0. It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much