[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-13 Thread Clebert Suconic
Vote passes with 10 Votes (8 Bindings, 2 non Bindings) Binding: Clebert Suconic Timothy Bish Jean-Baptiste Onofre Christopher Shannon Havret Gary Tully Robbie Gemmel Francisco Nigro Non binding: Emmanuel Hugonnet Domenico Francesco Bruscino I will finish updating the website and send the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-13 Thread Francesco Nigro
+1 Il mer 8 giu 2022, 18:24 Robbie Gemmell ha scritto: > +1 > > I checked things over as follows: > - Verified the signature + checksum files. > - Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in the archives. > - Checked licence headers in the source archive by running: > "mvn apache-rat:check" > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-13 Thread Robbie Gemmell
Ordinarily I try to avoid respinning, I just treat most things as reason to do another release sooner, unless they are clear regressions likely to raise concern (founded or otherwise). I probably would have just respun in this case, as the new vote could have also closed out today if it had been.

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Agree to close this vote and prepare a New one soon. Regards JB Le ven. 10 juin 2022 à 23:14, Clebert Suconic a écrit : > Before I close the result, I would like to highlight ARTEMIS-3856 > which is a regression I caused. > > > When I fixed the ThreadLocal non static usages, I reverted

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-10 Thread Clebert Suconic
Before I close the result, I would like to highlight ARTEMIS-3856 which is a regression I caused. When I fixed the ThreadLocal non static usages, I reverted some of Franz' code here that would be dealing with recurrent calls on resumeWrite. Some of the replication tests where a catch up is

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-10 Thread Gary Tully
+1 On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 20:05, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. > > As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of > Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs. > > > > The release notes can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-09 Thread Havret
+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1]. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1]

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-09 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1 On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 1:43 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:05 PM Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. > > > > As part of this release I would like to highlight the

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:05 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. > > As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of > Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs. > > > > The release notes can be found

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-08 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
+1 non binding * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.23.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-08 Thread Timothy Bish
On 6/7/22 15:05, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs. The release notes can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-08 Thread Emmanuel Hugonnet
+1 non binding Passed wildfly basic testsuite Le 07/06/2022 à 21:05, Clebert Suconic a écrit : I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs. The release notes can be

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-08 Thread Robbie Gemmell
+1 I checked things over as follows: - Verified the signature + checksum files. - Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files in the archives. - Checked licence headers in the source archive by running: "mvn apache-rat:check" - Ran the Qpid JMS main HelloWorld against the broker from the binary

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
Sorry for my copy & paste typo: here is the correct URI for the maven repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1253 On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:05 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. > > As part of

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0

2022-06-07 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.23.0 release. As part of this release I would like to highlight the addition of Jakarta 10 to the supported APIs. The release notes can be found here: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/release-notes-2.23.0 The git