[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. Vote passes with 8 Binding Votes Clebert Suconic Timothy Bish Jean-Baptiste Onofre Gary Tully Christopher Shannon Havret Domenico Francesco Bruscino Robbie Gemmel Thank you for all the contributions and time to verify this release. I will

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-03 Thread Robbie Gemmell
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:19, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: > > - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal > simply relying on paging itsel

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-02 Thread Domenico Francesco Bruscino
+1 (binding) * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include pom.xml "(.|\n)*2.28.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./` * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 36 using OpenJDK 17 * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome` * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-01 Thread Havret
+1 (binding) I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1] 2.12.0. It's all green. To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests. Cheers, Krzysztof [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-clie

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-01 Thread Christopher Shannon
+1, looks good to me On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:07 PM Gary Tully wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:19, Clebert Suconic > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. > > > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: > > > > - Pag

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-02-01 Thread Gary Tully
+1 On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:19, Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: > > - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal > simply relying on paging i

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-01-31 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:18 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: > > - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal > si

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-01-31 Thread Timothy Bish
On 1/31/23 10:18, Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal simply relying on paging itself for that - We impleme

Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-01-31 Thread Clebert Suconic
+1 On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:18 AM Clebert Suconic wrote: > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. > > I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: > > - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal > simply relying on pagin

[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0

2023-01-31 Thread Clebert Suconic
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.28.0 release. I would like to highlight the following changes in this release: - Page counting improved. We no longer store counters in the journal simply relying on paging itself for that - We implemented a way to sync mirror from AMQP Broker