A couple notes on shared durable subscriptions:
1. They are limited per the spec (you can’t mix shared and non-shared)
2. The effectively create ‘queue’ characteristics on a topic
Given the above, most users have moved to using ActiveMQ’s Virtual Topics
instead. They are much easier to manage
We plan 6.0.1 pretty quickly but no plan yet about 6.1.0.
I plan to work on an implementation plan with detailed
approaches/proposals (of course when 6.0.0 will be out ;) ). I will
share on the mailing list for discussion.
Then, we can define a roadmap and "attach" to releases.
Regards
JB
On
I don't think it is very likely shared durable topics are going to be
available in 6.1.0, unless we don't plan to release 6.1.0 for a long time.
Shared subscriptions are going to be a decent amount of work to get correct
as I don't think we should just hack the client to created a virtual topic
Hi,
The first support has started in ActiveMQ 6.0.0 currently in vote.
However, some features are not fully implemented, it's planned for
6.1/6.2 releases.
For instance, regarding Shared Durable Topic, you can see some method
throwing IllegalStateException("Operation not supported by a
Hi all,
Any information or plans for the JMS 2.0 / JMS 3.1 implementation in
ActiveMQ Classic?
I'm more interested in the Shared Durable Topic feature.
With some guidance or help, I can probably help on this.
Thanks
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
