Hi Kaxil,
Thanks for running the release!
There are two findings, for your consideration
* Issue-1:
- Description: In the DAG page, when we click on each task, we’re able to mark
its state to Success or Failed. But for all the *manually-triggered* DAG Runs,
when I try to mark state for its tas
Please download *1.10.2b2 *now. I had to remove it 1.10.2b1 from PyPI
because of an issue.
It can be installed with SLUGIFY_USES_TEXT_UNIDECODE=yes pip install
'apache-airflow --pre'
OR
SLUGIFY_USES_TEXT_UNIDECODE=yes pip install 'apache-airflow==1.10.2b2'
(Don't worry, without asking for `--pr
Hi Everyone,
I've just released a beta version of *1.10.2*! Please, could you test this
and report back any problems you notice, and also report back if you tried
it and it works fine. As this is the first time I've released Airflow there
is possible that there are packaging mistakes too. I'm not
Hey all,
I have just created AIP-9 and would love to hear your feedback on this.
It's about Dependency Management in Airflow and how we could improve it.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-9+Automated+Dependency+Management
Best regards,
Felix Uellendall
Yes, I've requested to set up the Dockerhub integration at INFRA:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17595
Did not know that it came with the Github integration. After merging
AIRFLOW-3673 this should be fixed again.
Cheers, Fokko
Op za 12 jan. 2019 om 13:34 schreef Jarek Potiuk :
> I th
It's about the commits integration - not PRs (please take a look at the
screenshots in the link I posted there).
What I used in other projects (they run on Bitbucket before Github
integration was there) - it worked really well is that for every JIRA issue
you can see the actual commits that solve i
I think it's the result of work of @Fokko Driesprong and
Peter on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3673 ( WIP here
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4483 ) about official docker file
built via Dockerhub.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:21 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Recently
I added a comment to the ticket explaining that as it wasn't super-obvious
indeed that it's about commit integration.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> It's about the commits integration - not PRs (please take a look at the
> screenshots in the link I posted there).
> What I
Done
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 12:22 PM Felix Uellendall
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to request access to create an AIP on confluence. My
> Confluence ID is "feluelle".
>
> Best regards,
> Felix Uellendall
>
>
--
*Kaxil Naik*
*Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
*Certified *Google Clou
Hey all,
I would like to request access to create an AIP on confluence. My
Confluence ID is "feluelle".
Best regards,
Felix Uellendall
Hi guys,
Recently there have been 2 checks on master (1) Our Travis CI (2) Docker CI
as you can see from the screenshot below. I don't know
how this got added. Is anyone aware about this? Or should I raise ticket
with Apache Infra to remove Docker CI integration?
*Screenshot: https://ibb.co/x21y
I think the integration was already done. Whenever someone creates a jira
and then PR mentioning that jira, that info is directly added to jira.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019, 09:34 Jarek Potiuk I opened ticket for that one:
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17629
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 8:22
I opened ticket for that one:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17629
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 8:22 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Superb. Can I open such ticket? Or it's better if it comes from someone
> from PMC ?
>
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 5:01 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
>> That's a great news.
13 matches
Mail list logo
