+1 binding
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:56 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:55 PM Dan Davydov
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry +1 (binding) :).
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:53 PM Dan Davydov
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:40 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 binding
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 8:55 PM Dan Davydov
wrote:
> Sorry +1 (binding) :).
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:53 PM Dan Davydov wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:40 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <
> > tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone!
> >>
> >> This email
Sorry +1 (binding) :).
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:53 PM Dan Davydov wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:40 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <
> tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> This email calls for a vote on the design proposed in AIP-31:
>>
>>
+1
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:40 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> This email calls for a vote on the design proposed in AIP-31:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-31:+Airflow+functional+DAG+definition
>
> Discussion threads:
>
>
Hi ,
We have faced the similar issue and debugged the scheduler code and found
that back fill don't have much options given( Back fill logic is different
in more scheduling point) .In this case once the DAG is stuck it is stuck
. Instead of using backfill you can use trigger_dag which has more
Hi Chetan,
Please see our documentation here https://airflow.apache.org/. Please feel free
to reach out if you have further questions.
On Mar 25, 2020, 10:29 AM -0700, Chetan Agarwal , wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I am Chetan Agarwal, third-year Computer Science and Engineering
> Student at National
+1
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:20 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tomek
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:14 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> >
> > Sounds good, thanks Daniel.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:57 PM Daniel Imberman <
> daniel.imber...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello all!
>
Dear Sir,
I am Chetan Agarwal, third-year Computer Science and Engineering
Student at National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal. I would
like to know more about this project. Can you please share some resources
or details of this project. I have some prior experience with
Hi all,
Should we proceed with the vote?
T.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:37 AM Gerard Casas Saez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry for leaving this unfinished. I was commenting an extension that
> Tomasz suggested in the AIP doc, to add fields in the operator that serve
> as templated args. This
+1
Tomek
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:14 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> Sounds good, thanks Daniel.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:57 PM Daniel Imberman
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all!
> >
> > Since the KEDA autoscaler has been released, for the moment there’s not
> > too much going on with
Sounds good, thanks Daniel.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:57 PM Daniel Imberman
wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Since the KEDA autoscaler has been released, for the moment there’s not
> too much going on with SIG-Autoscaling. For this reason I think we should
> suspend the monthly meetings and take them
Hello all!
Since the KEDA autoscaler has been released, for the moment there’s not too
much going on with SIG-Autoscaling. For this reason I think we should suspend
the monthly meetings and take them on a more ad-hoc basis (e.g. if there is a
call for feedback on the FargateExecutor). If new
One thing for the donation.
Did you you want to have separate repository Greg ?
I think we should simply create a folder in Airflow repo and keep it
there (similarly as we keep Dockerfile). I am going to switch our
Kubernetes Tests to the production image (will make the tests much
faster) and I
OK. I think that one does not need voting then. I will proceed with my PR
for that :).
J.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:38 PM Daniel Imberman
wrote:
> Agreed. Kind of a “best we can do” considering the current nature of
> python.
> On Mar 24, 2020, 2:45 PM -0700, Driesprong, Fokko ,
> wrote:
> >
Agreed. Kind of a “best we can do” considering the current nature of python.
On Mar 24, 2020, 2:45 PM -0700, Driesprong, Fokko , wrote:
> Yes, I'd be in favor of not having two packages, and just pinning the
> versions then. In this case, all the versions will be pinned, so if a user
> wants to
I was doing backfill running a one task dag. There were over 1000 dag_runs
ready to run, I set concurrency=16 and max_active_run=16, I use Celery executor
and have 12 workers. Task instances were quickly scheduled, but they stuck
there and never get run. I did a search online and got this:
Hi guys,
> I think the problem here is not the tool like Jira but the way we are using
> it.
I fully agree with Michał that there should be some rules / guidelines
agreed among community to follow.
> Automation can help here. Auto-labelling and good templates might be
> a good start. We should
Hi Team,
Currently, I am in the process of drafting a proposal for Gsoc. The project
title was *Enhancing the Airflow UI*, in this I want to resolve the
existing UI issues in the codebase. I have planned to add the following
issues into my proposal,
1. AIRFLOW-5647
18 matches
Mail list logo
