Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.12 based on 1.10.12rc3

A gentle reminder to everyone. On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:21 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:58 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > >> Hello Apache Airflow Community, >> >> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version 1.10.12. >> >> The release candidate: >

Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

Thanks Gerard, added my suggestions. On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 7:17 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > It's super cool indeed! I already made my suggestions and comments. I think > there is no need to do vote - lazy consensus should be applied in this case > I think when you think is ready :). > > J. > > On

Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

It's super cool indeed! I already made my suggestions and comments. I think there is no need to do vote - lazy consensus should be applied in this case I think when you think is ready :). J. On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Gerard Casas Saez wrote: > I do have access, I will add it there once th

Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

I do have access, I will add it there once there's consensus (not sure if we should submit this to vote). Gerard Casas Saez Twitter | Cortex | @casassaez On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:09 PM Ry Walker wrote: > Proposal looks good to me Gerard - thanks for putting this

Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

Proposal looks good to me Gerard - thanks for putting this together! -Ry On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:41 PM Gerard Casas Saez wrote: > Hi folks, > > I realized that the AIP process was not super clear at times. I was lucky > when I proposed AIP-31 that Dan and Tomek guided me through most of the >

Re: [Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

This is awesome, thank you :). If no one is currently on point to adding those contents to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals happy to help (unless you have permissions already). On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:41 PM Gerard Casas Saez wrote: > Hi folks,

[Discuss] Improving AIP process documentation

Hi folks, I realized that the AIP process was not super clear at times. I was lucky when I proposed AIP-31 that Dan and Tomek guided me through most of the process themselves, but I realize this may be confusing for new members of the community. For that reason and after discussing this with Kamil

Re: [AIP-34] Rewrite SubDagOperator

Agree on this being non-blocking. Regarding moving to vote, you can take care. Just open a new email thread on dev list and call for a vote. You can see this example from Tomek for AIP-31: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r16ee2b6263f5849a2e2b1b6c3ba39fb3d643022f052216cb19a0a8da%40%3Cdev.airfl

Aiflow backfill jobs failing with dead lock

Hi , We are facing an issue with backfill . There are few jobs which run frequently like every 1/2 hr during the day. The jobs are running fine , But weekly once or twice the jobs are failing with Deadlock Can you share me the details how to fix this Thanks & Regards Pavan

Re: Spam to Apache committers on Github

It was brought up. Apologies for that. It won't happen again pt., 21 sie 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Svata Dedic napisał: > Hello, > > Sorry if the issue was already brought up, I've joined this mailing list > just now to solve this one issue. > > I would like to kindly ask to use group mentions VERY

Spam to Apache committers on Github

Hello, Sorry if the issue was already brought up, I've joined this mailing list just now to solve this one issue. I would like to kindly ask to use group mentions VERY carefully, especially @apache/apache-committers (issues #10085, #5763). I am a committer in a different Apache project, wit