+1 binding
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020, 14:15 Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Thanks! - we will make separate release with that fix once this vote
> passes ;)
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:17 PM Nathan Hadfield
> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>>
>>
>> The issues I raised (and fixed) for `BigQueryInsertJobOperator` has
FYI - I started to get notifications from GitHub that the workflows I had
in the airflow forks are being disabled, so it happens as planned !
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:18 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We had protection in Airflow GitHub actions that prevented our scheduled
>
Thanks! - we will make separate release with that fix once this vote passes
;)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:17 PM Nathan Hadfield
wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
>
> The issues I raised (and fixed) for `BigQueryInsertJobOperator` has now
> been merged so it’s a +1 (non-binding) from me – for what it’s worth.
Nice!
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:19 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Github Discussions have now been enabled:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/.
>
> I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack
> for asking questions so they are indexed:
>
Github Discussions have now been enabled:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/.
I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack
for asking questions so they are indexed:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11940
Regards,
Kaxil
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:16
Hey,
The issues I raised (and fixed) for `BigQueryInsertJobOperator` has now been
merged so it’s a +1 (non-binding) from me – for what it’s worth.
Cheers,
Nathan
From: Jarek Potiuk
Reply to: "dev@airflow.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, 29 October 2020 at 09:08
To: "dev@airflow.apache.org"
The change is merged.
Please rebase your PRs to the latest master and try it.
Your PR builds in most of the cases should be much more "gentle" with the
other builds. They should only run one default matrix configuration, but
then in case of "core" changes, it will have to be followed up by a
I would love some +1s on that :)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:57 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Good. Google Provider won't be so lonely :)
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:23 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
>> Looks like we should get https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11509 in
>> too for ES Provider
>>
>> On
