Nice! On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 1:19 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Github Discussions have now been enabled: > https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/. > > I have created a PR to direct Users to Github Discussions instead of Slack > for asking questions so they are indexed: > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/11940 > > Regards, > Kaxil > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 8:16 PM Ry Walker <r...@rywalker.com> wrote: > >> I+1 >> >> It’s hard to be subscribed to both dev@ and users@ (so. much. email.), >> and you’d need devs subscribed to both for users to have a good experience, >> to get their questions well-answered. >> >> I unsubscribed from users@ and now that is invisible to me - good for my >> focus, bad for the users. >> >> A majority of Airflow users would know GitHub and have an account, and it >> would be convenient to the devs if most questions were asked there, rather >> than on users@ or slack - because: >> >> - We’re already in GitHub reviewing PRs and issues >> - the q&a would have a permalink, and be indexed in search engines better >> (reduce repeated questions) >> - It’s be worthwhile to write better questions and write better answers >> there vs on an ephemeral mailing list or slack thread >> >> This change would enhance UX for both devs and users. >> >> -Ry >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 3:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> I'm with Aizhamal, though slightly stronger at -0.5. >>> >>> -ash >>> >>> On Sep 25 2020, at 7:37 pm, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> -0 binding, because we never really promoted the user list in airflow >>> (it was set up relatively late) and never made a clear distinction between >>> user/dev lists. But I see the convenience it brings to developers, though >>> there is a potential to lock out users who are not familiar with GitHub. >>> >>> Also, we must add code of conduct with the PR and update the website >>> with the info of where user questions need to be directed. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 9:34 AM Maxime Beauchemin < >>> maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:40 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> @tomek - Yup we could do that >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 8:35 PM Tomasz Urbaszek <turbas...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> Should we change "Ask a question or get support" issue type to point >>> to GH discussion? >>> >>> T. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 9:15 PM Austin Bennett >>> <whatwouldausti...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > just make sure to appropriate self-police, to keep use for intended >>> purposes. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:05 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1. >>> >> >>> >> I did share some concerns with folks, but I think mostly already >>> clarified well in the earlier discussion. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> XD >>> >> >>> >> On 22 Sep 2020, at 9:00 PM, Daniel Imberman < >>> daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> via Newton Mail >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:59 AM, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> >>> >> This email calls for a vote to enable Github Discussion on Apache >>> Airflow repo. >>> >> >>> >> Intended Use: >>> >> A forum for users, you might consider it as a replacement of >>> us...@airflow.apache.org. >>> >> >>> >> Caveats: >>> >> >>> >> GitHub discussion is NOT to be used for anything other than user >>> help. As is the policy of the ASF Foundation, all code-related discussions >>> and project management activities MUST be reflected to an ASF mailing list ( >>> dev@airflow.apache.org). >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Discussion Thread: >>> >> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb8c12f0a9f2be43eeab8036104c4799eb645ebed3920b390dc61b76%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E >>> >> >>> >> Consider this my +1 binding >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Kaxil >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> -- >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
