Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

2020-12-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
That was a call for lazy consensus :) https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus Obviously, it was not silent this time :D J. On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:12 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > "unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care > if someone objec

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

2020-12-04 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
"unless someone objects" -- so this isn't an official vote, we only care if someone objects :D -a On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall wrote: Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

2020-12-04 Thread Felix Uellendall
Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has to process email attachments. 😅 +1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting prefix in the email subject. Isn’t that require

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.14 based on 1.10.14rc1

2020-12-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+1 (binding) Checked: * several combinations of mysql/postgres/python/rbac from pypi - all looks good. * licences, signatures (using the new public key of Kaxil with @apache.org :) ) and SHA's from dist. J. On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 11:55 AM Nathan Hadfield wrote: > Hey! > > > > Given that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.14 based on 1.10.14rc1

2020-12-04 Thread Nathan Hadfield
Hey! Given that the bug I raised was a big reason for this release, please consider this my +1 (non-binding). Cheers, Nathan From: Kaxil Naik Date: Friday, 4 December 2020 at 00:27 To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.14 based on 1.10.14rc1 Hello Apache Airf

Re: [VOTE] Approach for supported python versions

2020-12-04 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:57 AM Darren Weber wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:23 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 10:14 PM Deng Xiaodong >> wrote: >> >>> Yep, it clarifies. I find it important because people may have different >>> interpretations on "*suppor

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

2020-12-04 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 (binding) On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 2:15 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:41 PM James Timmins wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:35 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 5:22 PM Arthur Wiedmer >>>