Vending AWS System Test Results Back to the Community

2022-08-18 Thread Oliveira, Niko
Hey folks, Those of us on the AWS Airflow team (myself, Dennis F, Vincent B, Seyed H) have been working on a few projects over the past few months: 1. Writing example dags/docs for all existing Operators in the AWS Airflow provider package (done) 2. Writing AWS specific logic in Airflow

[GitHub] [airflow-checks-action] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2: Bump @actions/core from 1.2.6 to 1.9.1

2022-08-18 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-checks-action/pull/2 Bumps [@actions/core](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/tree/HEAD/packages/core) from 1.2.6 to 1.9.1. Changelog Sourced from

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 15, 2022 (RC4)

2022-08-18 Thread Ping Zhang
+1 binding Thanks, Ping On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:07 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:45 PM Phani Kumar > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding). Our databricks DAG ran fine with the databricks 3.2.0rc4 >> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Ephraim Anierobi < >>

Airflow Providers released on August 18, 2022 are ready

2022-08-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that new versions of Airflow Providers packages were just released: * common-sql: 1.1.0 * databricks: 3.2.0 This a follow up release with fixes of bugs in the RC candidates of those providers found during testing. The source release, as well as the

Re: [Proposal] Creating DAG through the REST api

2022-08-18 Thread Jarek Potiuk
None of those requirements are supported by Airflow. And opening REST API does not solve the authentication use case you mentioned. This is a completely new requirement you have - basically what you want is workflow identity and it should be rather independent from the way DAG is submitted. It

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 15, 2022 (RC4)

2022-08-18 Thread Elad Kalif
+1 binding On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 12:45 PM Phani Kumar wrote: > +1 (non binding). Our databricks DAG ran fine with the databricks 3.2.0rc4 > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) verified licenses, checksum & signatures >> >>