Re: [PROPOSAL] Dealing with public runner test failues (Integration tests restructuring)

2022-12-07 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Two PRs merged. Two more to go: * https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28209 * https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28207 I run quite a few public runs and I have not seen more memory problems :) - so once we merge those, we should be back in green for Public runners as well (plus the builds

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dealing with public runner test failues (Integration tests restructuring)

2022-12-07 Thread Oliveira, Niko
Awesome to hear this! I was really battling this issue last week, very excited for these improvements, let me know if I can help. Cheers, Niko From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 5:54:07 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL]

Re: [VOTE] New Provider: Cloudera

2022-12-07 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Yeah. I would really want to understand that (and maybe others have an opinion here): https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html * Is this a "code modification" - where -1 is veto * or is it a "procedural issue" - where -1 is just a vote and majority rules I personally think that "code

Re: [VOTE] New Provider: Cloudera

2022-12-07 Thread Philippe Lanoe
Hello Airflow community, Following up on this -1. I'm assuming that's a veto? If it is, would it be possible to decouple the provider sustainability discussion from this proposal (Cloudera provider addition request)? I do think sustainability discussions make full sense but I feel that this new