Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

What a great set of PRs to choose from. Amazing work everyone! So hard to choose, but my vote goes for 29413 - looks lovely! On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:52 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > One more for 29413 > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 16:15, Jed Cunningham > wrote: > > > Another for 29413. > > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.5.3 (based on RC2) has been accepted. 5 "+1" binding votes received: - Brent Bovenzi - Jarek Potiuk - Elad Kalif - Kaxil Naik - Pierre Jeambrun 3 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Josh Fell - Pankaj Singh - Hussein Awala Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/lx2x

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

+1 (non-binding) From: Kaxil Naik Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 10:00:59 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2 +1 binding On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 06:31, Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Mar 31, 20

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-55 Rule-based timetable with logical composition

> 1) *Calendars are dynamic*.Special events cannot be avoided: 911 - financial markets and air flights were cancelled for a while in the US, country wide protests due to law changes in France right now, etc. These are immediate changes to "the calendar". We need to be able to push calendar de

Re: Request for feedback on proposal for new OpenLineage provider in Airflow

Thank you all who attended. Here are the slides we presented today: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1o8VnXHXME_Vf-eQpQ5qvC7fb951CjBHmrsCsLW1Z1_8/edit?usp=sharing I'll also post the recording once available. Julien On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:40 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Added :) > > On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

+1 binding On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 06:31, Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:13 AM Josh Fell .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:18 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > +1 binding > > > tested some of my demo dags. looks good.

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

One more for 29413 On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 16:15, Jed Cunningham wrote: > Another for 29413. >

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-55 Rule-based timetable with logical composition

I also like this feature suggestion and think it steps in the right direction. This idea is crucial for businesses who schedule their data pipelines and other actions based on Calendars. We use multiple calendars depending on the countries or even regions in which we operate. In addition to the o

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

Another for 29413.

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-55 Rule-based timetable with logical composition

Yep. I also think it's a good addition. Though again - I don't think AIP is something that we need here, simply a PR where it could be iterated on, should be enough IMHO. It's **just** another timetable to add, we are not changing any architectural decision here. I'd also separate out the discussi

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

29413 for me as well. On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 9:57 AM Phani Kumar wrote: > > My vote goes to [28850] by @pankajastro: "Add deferrable mode in > RedshiftPauseClusterOperator " > , as it formed the base for us to implement several deferrable operators

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

My vote goes to [28850] by @pankajastro: "Add deferrable mode in RedshiftPauseClusterOperator " , as it formed the base for us to implement several deferrable operators on AWS. On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 11:43 AM Jorrick Sleijster wrote: > Some great P

Re: AIP-56 Extensible user management

Bumping this up for feedback! @Vikram, @Kaxil, et al. - I understand that you're quite busy, but we would greatly appreciate your feedback here. Your inputs could help us improve the proposal and move forward with multi-tenancy work. Cheers, Shubham On 2023-03-28, 2:05 PM, "Beck, Vincent" ma

Re: [DISCUSS] AIP-55 Rule-based timetable with logical composition

Hi Malthe I really like this feature suggestion, especially since it's crucial for customers who are transitioning from Control-M or Autosys [1] to Airflow. Implementing this feature has the potential to bring Airflow's scheduling capabilities on par with these tools. > I actually added some s