Re: [PROPOSAL] let's update the community content on the landing pages

I generally like the idea of removing the hardcoding to ease the maintainability over a long duration. I am also in favour of the idea of having some role such as community manager(s) who can regularly perform such tasks, keep the site aware of such events happening and update the

Re: [PROPOSAL] let's update the community content on the landing pages

I am in. And would even like to see this more "live" over time. But Maybe a proposal here. Looking at things like https://airflow.apache.org/survey/ I - for one - would be perfectly fine if someone - you and Briana - take more "stewardship' for those pages Maybe that's a good idea that we

[RESULT][VOTE] December 2023 PR of the Month

Hey All, This was a close one! It was neck and neck at 5 votes apiece until Kaxil came in with a late vote and broke the tie, making it 6 to 5! Congratulations to Huy Duong on winning PR of the Month for December 2023 for PR #35719: Add XCom tab to Grid. <

Re: [DISCUSSION] Enabling `pre-commit.ci` application for Airflow

Yep. Also surprised by the 50/50 - so far the "easy" path is blocked by INFRA, so I am not sure if we will quickly do it, but I will likely see what we can do soon. And yes. This is the same for me - I **LOVE** black and always have pre-commit installed because I do not have to spend any

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standardize Airflow Packaging and build process (modern appropriate PEP-compliant tooling)

I slept over it a few nights and got away of it and I have an idea to simplify it quite a bit - i.e. cut the number of extras by half and virtually make 0 impact on current editable installation so you might wnnt to hold on a bit with that (unless you want to see it changing :) ) .. The whole

Re: [DISCUSSION] Enabling `pre-commit.ci` application for Airflow

Interesting how 50/50 this one has turned out to be! I'm personally in favour (+1). The less I have to worry about accidental typos, indentation, quoting, etc the better, I can focus on important changes. It will also unblock many PRs from contributors that are otherwise mergeable except for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Standardize Airflow Packaging and build process (modern appropriate PEP-compliant tooling)

I personally think that this is a great idea. I have been following the hatch project for a while and I am convinced it has a lot to offer for airflow. The two big pros for me are its ease of use (backend and front end) as well as the security covered aspects (reproducible builds to name one). I

Re: [Discussion] AIP-60 Standard URI representation for Airflow Datasets

Nice work. I added some comments on parameters in the path component and representation of cloud storage uris. Bolke On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 22:51, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Happy 2024, > > Added some nits - mostly informational, generally LGTM > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 11:23 AM Tzu-ping Chung >

Re: [VOTE] December PR of the Month

+1 for #35719 On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 01:50, Mehta, Shubham wrote: > +1 for #35926 -- this was amazing contribution, backed by significant > preparatory work. > I love all the UI contributions, but I've noticed a bias towards > recognizing UI work, perhaps due to immediate visibility. This is my