Re: [VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

2024-01-22 Thread Aritra Basu
My vote is for #36537 it's been a huge effort and it makes huge improvements in our packaging. Great to see it make it into airflow. -- Regards, Aritra Basu On Tue, Jan 23, 2024, 10:13 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Is there a possibility to vote for more than one? I guess not :/ > > My vote goes to

Re: [VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

2024-01-22 Thread Amogh Desai
Is there a possibility to vote for more than one? I guess not :/ My vote goes to #36537 for the enhancements that have come in with it. I have followed the discussions at a higher level and it surely wasn't easy :) (If I could vote again, it would surely be #36537 for the endless perseverance and

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard URI representation for Airflow Datasets)

2024-01-22 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 11:04 PM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > From: Wei Lee > Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 5:24:54 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard > URI

Re: [DISCUSSION] Enhanced Multi-Tenant Dataset Management in Airflow: Potential First Steps

2024-01-22 Thread Ryan Hatter
I don't think it makes sense to include the create endpoint without also including dataset update and delete endpoints and updating the Datasets view in the UI to be able to manage externally created Datasets. With that said, I don't think the fact that Datasets are tightly coupled with DAGs is a

Re: [VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

2024-01-22 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Heck, why not. I will shamelessly vote on my #36537. While it took just a few weeks to merge, It leapfrogged our legacy packaging setup to more-or-less bleeding edge from what was there since the beginning of Airflow (almost 10 years) and was already "old-ish" when I joined the project more than 4

Re: [VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

2024-01-22 Thread Constance Martineau
+1 #22253 The PR was opened in March 2022, and was finally merged last week! I admire the author's persistence in getting this merged in, and think the simplifications to the interface make the Operator more user-friendly for our Data Science users. On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:29 PM Briana Okyere

[VOTE] January 2024 PR of the Month

2024-01-22 Thread Briana Okyere
Hey All, It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month. With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates` script in dev/stats, we've identified the following candidates: PR #36513: Include plugins in the architecture diagrams. PR #32867:

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard URI representation for Airflow Datasets)

2024-01-22 Thread Oliveira, Niko
+1 (binding) From: Wei Lee Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2024 5:24:54 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [COURRIEL EXTERNE] [VOTE] Accept AIP-60 (Standard URI representation for Airflow Datasets) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the

[VOTE] [RESULT] New Airflow Community Provider: Teradata

2024-01-22 Thread K Mallam, Sunil
Hi Airflow Community, We've sent a proposal for Teradata being Airflow's new community provider. After 72 hours of voting, we have 9 positive votes (4 binding and 5 non-binding). Here's a link to the voting thread. Please

[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 22, 2024

2024-01-22 Thread Elad Kalif
Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on January 25, 2024 12:10 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Consider this my (binding) +1. Airflow