Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

Hi Jarek, Awesome!! I’m interested to join too Ephraim On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 23:41, Mehta, Shubham wrote: > This is great, thanks for working with them to share this with the > community. Interested to join as well. > > Shubham > > On 2024-06-07, 11:56 PM, "Jarek Potiuk" ja...@potiuk.com>>

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

This is great, thanks for working with them to share this with the community. Interested to join as well. Shubham On 2024-06-07, 11:56 PM, "Jarek Potiuk" mailto:ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments u

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

Hi Jarek, Love to hear about it! But it’s way too late for my time. 😞 Would it be possible for us to record it? Best, Wei > On Jun 11, 2024, at 7:12 AM, Julian LaNeve > wrote: > > +1 I'd love to hear about it but unfortunately can't make the meeting! > > -- > > *Julian LaNeve* > CTO > > E

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

+1 I'd love to hear about it but unfortunately can't make the meeting! -- *Julian LaNeve* CTO Email: jul...@astronomer.io ( jul...@astronomer.io ) Mobile: 330 509 5792 On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 3:05 PM, Constance Martineau < consta...@astronomer.io.invalid > wrote: > > > > Hello again, > >

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

Hello again, Given all the enthusiasm - assuming Nielsen is ok with this - what if someone recorded the meeting so that it could be shared with those that are interested? Constance On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 1:48 PM Constance Martineau wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > Same :) > > Thanks, > Constance > > On

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

Hi Jarek, Same :) Thanks, Constance On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 9:57 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > Hello Jarek, > > Please add me to the invite as well. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:22 AM Abhishek Bhakat > wrote: > > > Hi Jarek, > > > > I would also like to join

Re: [Meeting Notes] Airflow 3.0 Dev call - 4 June 2024

Amazing summary @Kaxil Naik ! I reviewed the discussion points and I am happy with them so far. I only have a few minor comments which I have posted on confluence. Looking forward to attending these calls in future. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 12:15 PM Jarek Potiuk wr

Re: [DISCUSS] common.compat provider (WAS: Common.util provider?)

I like the idea of having a common.compat provider too. (common.util was actually kinda confusing) * when providers get >= airflow 2.10 - we change them to import from > `airflow.openlineage` rather than from "airflow.providers.common.compat". > I am not so sure why this is the case. Can you elabo

Re: Call with Nielsen team demoing their DAG debugging feature

Hello Jarek, Please add me to the invite as well. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:22 AM Abhishek Bhakat wrote: > Hi Jarek, > > I would also like to join as well, please. > > Thanks, > Avi > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2024 at 3:32 PM Buğra Öztürk > wrote: > > > Hello Jarek, > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Automated managemenet of lower-bounds of airflow dependencies

Great work! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 10:42 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > And ... merged :). We should now have very nice automated upgrading of > lower-bound constraints for Airflow and Providers working for all PRs. If > there will be any problems with your PRs related

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Podcast Launch- The Data Flowcast: Mastering Airflow for Data Engineering & AI

This is very cool! Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 4:44 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Cool > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 7:02 PM Briana Okyere > wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > Very excited to announce the relaunch of the Airflow Podcast, now titled > > "the relaunch of our podcas

[LAZY CONSENSUS] Add YDB provider

Hello everyone. As discussed in https://lists.apache.org/thread/0sdjmnzjghtfwj25mmqcfr1sco5q5hnq this email calls for lazy consensus on adding of the YDB provider. Initial PR with new code: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39

Re: [DISCUSS] common.compat provider (WAS: Common.util provider?)

As the author of https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/39530 I love the idea. * when providers get >= airflow 2.10 - we change them to import from > `airflow.openlineage` rather than from "airflow.providers.common.compat". > What's the reasoning behind that? How would Airflow core release impact

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow 2.9.2 Released

Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 2.9.2 was just released. The released sources and packages can be downloaded via https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/installation/installing-from-sources.html Other installation methods are described in https://airflow.

Re: [DISCUSS] common.compat provider (WAS: Common.util provider?)

I think it's a good solution. The only known problem with that idea is that the common code has to live "forever" - as long as someone can use the older providers (or older Airflow version). The solution would be to introduce some explicit deprecation or versioning for provider dependencies - but t

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1

Hello, Apache Airflow 2.9.2 (based on RC1) has been accepted. 3 "+1" binding votes received: - Hussein Awala - Jarek Potiuk - Elad Kalif 4 "+1" non-binding votes received: - Rom Sharon - Phani Kumar - Scheffler Jens - Rahul Vats Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/zz10dy2kqy0c8c0dq0bz7