Yes. I agree. Airflow REST API does not have to be super efficient with the
exception of designated calls which are really designed to be efficient. We
might want to speed up some things for the Airflow Ui purposes for example.
And it should always be explicit decision when we add new filtering etc
It's great to see another big provider adding a system test dashboard! As
Jarek mentioned, that's a nice majority of the system tests covered now.
- ferruzzi
From: Kaxil Naik
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2024 3:14 AM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXT]
I tinkered with this a bit. I think the case to add indexes for "REST" API
may be weaker than even *I* thought (and I thought it was weak / was mostly
against it).
The reason is cus there are reasons beyond indexing why such API calls are
slow, and adding indexes may not even help that much. For
If you reimport from KEYS, I've already updated the expiration date a while
back :).
I know it's a lazy consensus, but I want to explicitly +1 this :)
pon., 17 cze 2024 o 11:15 Jarek Potiuk napisał(a):
> Also the discussion was continued there
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjmrv1wc2rxhkvozpvccs4mhgwg5sw2f (for
> posterity)
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Jarek Potiuk w
Thanks for your feedback!
Someone from the Cloud Composer team will work on it ~this week. We will
create an issue on https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues for this change.
- Eugene
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:47 PM Daniel Standish
wrote:
> I wonder if we could generalize to summarize what n
Also the discussion was continued there
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hjmrv1wc2rxhkvozpvccs4mhgwg5sw2f (for
posterity)
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:06 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Following the discussion
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r302p5b03dpyncswn11nkjn98cpb6r5z I would
Hello everyone,
Following the discussion
https://lists.apache.org/thread/r302p5b03dpyncswn11nkjn98cpb6r5z I would
like to call for a lazy consensus on introdiucing "common.compat" provider.
Summarizing what has been discussed there (and some of my further thoughts):
* common.compat provider will
+1 non binding Installed chart with kind cluster and verified running
example dags. LGTM!
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 at 13:19, Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Confirmed reproducibility, licenses, checksums, and signatures. It looks
> good though Jed's signature
+1 binding
Confirmed reproducibility, licenses, checksums, and signatures. It looks
good though Jed's signature has expired but I don't think it's a problem
Installed the chart and ran some example dags
- Ephraim
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024, 07:17 Amogh Desai, wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> Installed th
10 matches
Mail list logo
