Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

I don’t know how to compare the efforts since honestly I have very little idea how many templated fields people tend to have. I can outline what each group needs to do though. Airflow maintainers - Develop the compatibility layer - One time work before 3.0 - Maintenance afterwards, at le

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 03, 2024

+1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licences, checksums, signatures, checked my changes, all looks good. On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:46 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last f

[RESULT][VOTE] AIP-83 emove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run

Hi all, The vote for AIP-83 has passed. AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/SA3OEg Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8rokf8ogp7g5pf0koqksxhcwqlhr9217 Vote thread https://lists.apache.org/thread/wkjl9prj274psjqm32pqvg

Re: [VOTE] AIP-83 Remove Execution Date Unique Constraint from DAG Run

The vote has concluded and I will post the results in a separate thread soon. TP > On 3 Aug 2024, at 04:07, Bishundeo, Rajeshwar > wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > Great cleanup initiative! > > -- Rajesh > > > > > > > On 2024-08-02, 1:50 PM, "Buğra Öztürk"

Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

+1 (binding) On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 03:58, Vishnu Chilukoori wrote: > +1 (non-binding) for both > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (binding) for both APIs > > > > Best, > > Wei > > > > > On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) for both

Re: [VOTE] AIP-76: Asset Partitions

+1 (binding) On Sun, 4 Aug 2024 at 21:14, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). I think it's a big improvement, and I agree the "incremental" > part might be misleading as we essentially always "replace" (but with finer > granularity - partition level) - so we never "add" things incrementally and

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

+1 non-binding. We have always believed that a single airflow makes it easier for our users. Unfortunately that leaves much to be desired on isolation perspective. For that reason our most requested functionality remains; 'can I get a Variable or Connection only accessible to my team?'. Our users,

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

+1 non-binding Very happy to see this support! I've seen Airflow in several companies with a long long requirements.txt, in order to support the needs from multiple teams. I'm sure those maintainers are super excited to have this feature. On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:00 PM Vikram Koka wrote: > +1 b

Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

+1 (non-binding) for both On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (binding) for both APIs > > Best, > Wei > > > On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) for both > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi > > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Je

Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

+1 (binding) for both APIs Best, Wei > On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote: > > +1 (binding) for both > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web >> Application for Airflow 3.0

Re: [VOTE] AIP-76: Asset Partitions

+1 (binding). I think it's a big improvement, and I agree the "incremental" part might be misleading as we essentially always "replace" (but with finer granularity - partition level) - so we never "add" things incrementally and people might be misled here. On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 10:02 PM Shahar Ep

Re: [VOTE] AIP-76: Asset Partitions

+1 (binding) On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Yup, I am fine removing that language to make it explicit but leave it up > to TP. > > On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 19:56, Daniel Standish > wrote: > > > My concern with the AIP is the talk of support for incremental data > > pipelines.

Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

+1 (binding) for both On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi wrote: > Hi, > > Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web > Application for Airflow 3.0. We would like to open it up for a vote. > > AIP-79 > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/A