Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 03, 2024

+1 (binding) Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences.

[RESULT][VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

Hi all, The vote for AIP-79 and AIP 84 has passed. AIP-79 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-79%3A+Remove+Flask+AppBuilder+as+Core+dependency AIP-84 UI REST API https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-84+UI+REST+API Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.or

Airflow Mentors for MLH Fellowship

Hi Airflow team, I'm Amanda D'Avria, and I'm the Head of Educational Programs at Major League Hacking. Here at MLH we run an Open Source Fellowship program that functions like an internship for student developers to contribute to open source projects, and we've

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

I understand that the compatibility layer mentioned by TP would allow providers to work with both Airflow 2.x and 3.x. I could see it working in the following ways: 1) You can use DAGs with Airflow 3.x syntax in Airflow 2.x, so you can migrate your DAGs gradually to 3.x syntax before upgrading to i

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 03, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Tested my set of changes in the Databricks provider and they work well! On Mon, 5 Aug 2024, 21:50 utkarsh sharma, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:20 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licenc

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 03, 2024

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Utkarsh Sharma On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:20 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licences, checksums, signatures, > checked my changes, all looks good. > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:46 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I have just c

Re: Airflow 3 AIP Gold Rush! -- Great job everyone

Just noticed I had an incomplete sentence :) I meant: There is mutual respect between the members since they know that everyone is working for what's better for the Airflow Community. On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 22:16, Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi team, > > Before we head for the weekend, I wanted to take

Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core Dependency & UI REST API

+1 (binding On Mon 5 Aug 2024 at 08:17, Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 03:58, Vishnu Chilukoori > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) for both > > > > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) for both APIs > > > > > > Best, > > > Wei > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Proposal to Add OTEL Provider to Apache Airflow

I like the vision and the effect - even though we do not have much experiences with OTEL, I saw what it can do and I like what it "provides". And I found it very appealing when I saw it in "action" during some talks. Maybe it would be useful to see a somewhat realistic example of what can be done

Re: System Test Dashboards - Phase Two??

+1. Let's do it :). I think if others will agree, a LAZY CONSENSUS thread will do + documenting the format as PR + getting each team to implement it is a good way to progress. Once we have it exposed by at least two dashboards, we can add a "canary" test that will pull them and fail in case of err

Re: System Test Dashboards - Phase Two??

Hello all, I took a long time to reply to this thread, I was on a long vacation. +1 to Dennis' suggestion, I believe the provided JSON format contains the minimal information required to render a dashboard. I experimented with generating a JSON output from a development CI (from Google's side), I

Re: [VOTE] AIP-80: Explicit Template Fields in Operator Arguments

Also I have a feeling that with AST / smart conversion, we should be able to get an almost 100% accurate automated conversion of that one. It is "almost" (of-course there will be edge cases), but it looks like a pretty automate'able conversion. Maybe - I am not sure how possible it is due to contr