Agreed, I think this could be in the standard package too.
> On 9 Jun 2025, at 20:58, Bas Harenslak wrote:
>
> +1
>
> With one remark: this feels so “generic” to me that I don’t see why it
> necessitates a separate package. Why not include it in the standard provider?
>
> Bas
>
>> On 9 Jun 2
This AIP has passed with 22 +1 votes (16 form PMC/Committers and 6 community
members, thanks!) and zero -1 votes.
> On 4 Jun 2025, at 00:38, Vikram Koka wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Jens and I would like to call a vote on this AIP
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-90+H
Paging Daniel Standish — he’s got an old AIP (30 I think) that was targeting
this problem but the airflow “model” has moved on a bit since so it might need
re-working for the Airflow 3 world.
-ash
> On 10 Jun 2025, at 19:08, Ryan Hatter
> wrote:
>
> Like... XComs it makes sense to ship to o
