Option 1!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:18 PM Felipe Elias Lolas Isuani <
felipe.elias...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Option 1 đ
>
> El 21-08-2019, a la(s) 12:56, Maxime Beauchemin <
> maximebeauche...@gmail.com> escribiĂł:
>
> > Option 1 ++
> >
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:52 AM Tao Feng wrote:
> >>
> >>
Awesome! I've registered this meetup. Looking forward to attending the
event! I am also interested in any session you will host.
Thank you very much!
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:15 AM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> I will be speaking at NYC âApache Airflow Meetupâ on 26th of August with
> âItâs a Breeze to
It is sometimes hard to distinguish if it is a library or an application.
Take operator as an example, a non-tech people may think it as a well-built
application while an engineer may consider it as a library and extends
functionalities on it.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 4:26 PM Qingping Hou wrote:
>
Thank you!
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:05 AM Driesprong, Fokko
wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> You should have permissions now.
>
> Cheers, Fokko
>
> Op wo 31 jul. 2019 om 14:55 schreef Chen Tong :
>
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to modify my votes for AIP-21: Changes in im
Hi,
I'd like to modify my votes for AIP-21: Changes in import paths. Could you
help grand me the write permission?
Thanks!
> > >>>>>> PST) .
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> After the choice, the final consistent set of choices will be
> > > >>> announced
> > > >>>>>> (taking into account majority of binding vote, also including
&g
I agree with Ash. It is clear to vote on each case rather than all
together.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:54 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> A number of proposals overlap or add on to each other, so I think (?) a
> single vote makes sense.
>
> To be clear, my vote is -1 until it's clear exactly what
Congratulationsďź
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 14:53 Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have already posted this on LinkedIn but for others in the community, I
> am super-excited to announce that as of 20 June I have joined Astronomer as
> a full-time employee. And similar to Ash & Daniel, I will be spen
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:34 AM Christian Lellmann
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Jiajie Zhong schrieb am Di., 11. Juni 2019,
> 13:43:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best Wish
> > â Jiajie
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2019, at 19:21, Kaxil Naik > kaxiln...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Kaxil,
Can you help merge this PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4991?
These is another PR related to this.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4686
Thanks! Regards.
On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 12:26 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Please reply to this email wiith PR, commit ha
Congrats Joshua!
Thank you!
Chen Tong
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:23 PM Kevin Yang wrote:
> Congrats Joshua!
>
> Cheers,
> Kevin Y
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:40 PM Deng Xiaodong wrote:
>
> > Congrats Joshua!
> >
> > XD
> >
> > On
Do not set to datetime.now(). You could set to 2019-04-18 and it will start
scheduling at 2019-04-18 2 AM.
Chen
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 08:55 Pawel Bartoszek
wrote:
> Ash, If I omit start_date it I get the error
> Task is missing the start_date parameter
>
> What should I set it to then?
>
> On T
place to continue discussion.
Thanks again.
Chen Tong
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019, 10:16 Kamil BreguĹa wrote:
> Yes. This document also describes this problem. I wanted to collect all
> related problems.
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 4:13 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
>
> > This has
Is it possible to re-implement it in the view-level, not in operator level?
And this operator is just define a different view in GUI, that these tasks
will be collapsed into another view.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:31 AM James Meickle
wrote:
> I have avoided using them because of outstanding iss
IMHO, it's worth to have such dynamic hooks adding ability. I met issues
before that the current hook cannot satisfy the needs. I have to write my
own hook and hacked Connections. If hook is not coupled tightly with
Connections, it will be easier by switching to another python package.
On Fri, Apr
to "accept" it.
>
> -ash
>
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 16:04, Chen Tong wrote:
> >
> > AIP-8 is intended to achieve this by separate operators/hooks to
> individual
> > packages. But the author hasn't been actively working on this recently.
> >
&g
+1 (non-binding).
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:28 AM Julian De Ruiter <
julianderui...@godatadriven.com> wrote:
> I also wouldnât mind including black for checking formatting.
>
> > On 12 Apr 2019, at 15:20, Julian De Ruiter <
> julianderui...@godatadriven.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> >>
AIP-8 is intended to achieve this by separate operators/hooks to individual
packages. But the author hasn't been actively working on this recently.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:29 AM Julian De Ruiter <
julianderui...@godatadriven.com> wrote:
> Isnât this in contradiction with AIP-8, which is aimed a
SubDAG is really useful in my use case, otherwise the graph will be hard to
be managed. I guess it's better come out a better design rather than
deprecate this feature.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:51 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote:
> I'd like to find time to fix subdags as they do provide a useful
Hi,
I recently work on improving the Airflow documentations. I am not a tech
writer, but would like to contribute to the existing documentations. Thus,
if possible, I am willing to join the program, learn and practice more.
See a list of jira issues related to documentation.
https://issues.apache
20 matches
Mail list logo
