Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 26, 2024

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 7:24 PM Wei Lee wrote: > -1 (non-binding) for apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes, as Rahul > found an issue. > The issue is fixed in , as > mentioned. > > Best, > Wei > > > > On May 28, 2024, at 12:17 AM

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 (binding). This will be really nice to have! On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:56 AM Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:46 PM Brent Bovenzi > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:23 PM Oliveira, Niko > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (bindin

Re: [VOTE] New Airflow Community Provider: Teradata

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:53 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 binding. Makes sense to me. > > On 2024/01/16 18:21:39 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > +1 binding > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 6:20 PM Phani Kumar > > wrote: > > > > > +1 non binding > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:43 PM K

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Discuss] New Airflow Community Provider: Teradata

Lots of great work here already. I say let's put it to a vote. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:01 AM K Mallam, Sunil wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I just wanted to follow up on this thread before I start the voting thread. > > So far we’ve have 4 positive responses (with 1 binding vote). Is th

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Andrey Anshin (taragolis)

Congrats Andrey! Very well deserved indeed! On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:04 PM Wei Lee wrote: > Congrats Andrey! 🎉 > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jan 16, 2024, at 4:06 AM, Bishundeo, Rajeshwar > wrote: > > > > Congrats Andrey!! Well deserved!! > > > > -- Rajesh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2024-01-15

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 23, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 12:54 AM Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 9:53 AM Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023, 09:16 utkarsh sharma, > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Tested my changes in apache-ai

Re: Making Listeners API non-experimental

+1 On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 7:32 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 > > On Sun 17 Dec 2023 at 12:24, Scheffler Jens (XC-DX/PJ-PACE-E03) > wrote: > > > +1 (wow my fist binding vote 😃) - so stable I even did not notice it > > exists > > > > Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards > > > > Jens Scheffler >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Utkarsh Sharma

Congrats, Utkarsh!! On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:38 PM Wei Lee wrote: > Congratulations, Utkarsh! > > Best, > Wei > > > On Dec 5, 2023, at 5:58 AM, Oliveira, Niko > wrote: > > > > Congrats! Very well deserved! > > > > > > From: Pankaj Koti > > Sent: Monday, Decemb

Re: [VOTE] October 2023 PR of the Month

Joining the party for 34279 as well! On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 8:22 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 to 34729 > > Le mer. 1 nov. 2023 à 06:47, Avi a > écrit : > > > +1 for 34729 > > > > Reagrds, > > Avi > > > > > On Wednesday, Nov 01, 2023 at 05:44, utkarsh sharma < > > utkarshar...@gmail.com (mailt

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 (binding) for Pinecone, Cohere +0 (binding) for OpenAI. I share some of Hussein's concerns here. Or at least put a ceiling on the Python client of 1.0.0 and release v1.0.0 of the provider. Granted the provider can have successive major releases to handle the 1.0.0 rewrite, but the latest I see

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing Qubole provider (and adding removal process)

Seems reasonable to me! On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 7:28 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 30, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Utkarsh Sharma < > utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: > > > > +1 for the implementing the process, have little clue about the > provider. :) > > > > Thanks, >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 12, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Ran a few example DAGs. Everything looks good async and otherwise. On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:37 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked my changes and they are present in the RC. > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:33 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - checked sig

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 08, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Tested my changes (and another related one). Looks good. On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:58 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 11:37, Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > 1. Tested with #33825

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Suspend Qubole provider

It all seems very reasonable to me. +1 On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 9:23 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Following our process [1] I am calling for a lazy consensus on suspending > (for now) quibole provider > > Qubole has been acquired and seems that maintainers have left the project >

Re: [VOTE] Drop MsSQL as supported backend

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 8:35 AM Ankit Chaurasia wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:47 PM Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:10 PM Andrey Anshin > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Restore dag_run.conf UI triggering option for 2.7.0

Absolutely +1 On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:20 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 15:16, Michał Modras .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 - let's avoid forcing users to modify their DAGs > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 7:19 PM Vikram Koka > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (with emphasis

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Hussein Awala

Congrats Hussein!! On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:21 PM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > Congrats Hussein! > > > From: Beck, Vincent > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:32:08 AM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Hussein Awala > > CA

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Dennis Ferruzzi

Congrats Dennis!! On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 3:11 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > Congrats Dennis! > > On Wed 5 Jul 2023 at 09:07, Ankit Chaurasia wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 12:30 PM Phani Kumar > > wrote: > > > > > Congratulations Dennis ! > > > > > > On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committers: Vincent Beck, Phani Kumar, Maciej Obuchowski

Congrats Vincent, Phani, and Maciej!! On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 6:39 AM Dev FizzBuzz wrote: > Congrats folks! > > On Wed, 28 Jun, 2023, 11:45 am Elad Kalif, wrote: > > > Hello Airflow Community, > > > > I am happy to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for > > Apache Airflow has

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Pankaj Singh

Congrats Pankaj!! On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 3:36 AM Bowrna Prabhakaran wrote: > Congratulations, Pankaj :) > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:42 PM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > Many many congratulations, Pankaj! 🥳 > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023, 11:29 Ephraim Anierobi > > wrote: > > > > > Congratulation

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc4

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:04 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri 28 Apr 2023 at 18:03, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > +1 (binding). > > > > Fourth time's the charm. :crossed-fingers: > > On Apr 28 2023, at 3:27 pm, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Archiving some old repos

Makes sense to me. +1 On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 7:39 AM Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 > > Le sam. 22 avr. 2023 à 08:51, Jarek Potiuk a écrit : > > > Hello everyone, > > > > We have a few old unused git repositories that have been used in the past > > but now are defunct. Some of the old repos are m

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Hussein Awala

Congrats Hussein!! On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 2:18 AM Ping Zhang wrote: > Congrats Hussein! > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 14:52 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Hello Airflow Community, > > > > I am happy to announce that the Project Management Committee > > (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Hussein Aw

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 02, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:42 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > Hi Phani, > no this is not yet merged. Once merged it will be released in the followup > provider release. > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:36 AM Phani Kumar > wrote: > > > Is it possible to include https://github.com/apache/airflo

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.3 from 2.5.3rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:18 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > tested some of my demo dags. looks good. > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 7:31 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - checked my issues, tested it a bit, verified licences, > > signatures checksums - all looks goo

Re: [DISCUSS] Exclude some providers that hold us back from releasing

Agreed, this seems like a good move. On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 9:19 AM Beck, Vincent wrote: > +1 > > On 2023-03-29, 2:26 AM, "Elad Kalif" elad...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can con

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Pierre Jeambrun

Well deserved indeed, congrats Pierre! On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:52 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee > (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Pierre Jeambrun to become Apache > Airflow PMC Member and we are

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Brent Bovenzi

Amazing, congrats Brent! On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:50 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee > (PMC) for Apache Airflow has invited Brent Bovenzi to become Apache > Airflow PMC Member and we are pleased to annou

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 7:55 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 at 23:44, Jed Cunningham > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc1

+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 4:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 13:31, Hussein Awala wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) tested all my fixes, and checked some test dags with > > CeleryExecutor. > > > > > > From: Jarek Potiuk

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 03, 2023

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes across providers. On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:56 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. >

Re: [VOTE] Move K8S / Celery (and related) executors to respective providers

+1 binding On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > And just to add as I missed that in the original mail - this is "code > modification" vote - so all committers have a binding vote. > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > Also I have not menti

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 18, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 5:39 AM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 non-binding. Concurring with Rajath's tests. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > Email: pankaj.k...@ast

Re: [VOTE] AIP-53 OpenLineage in Airflow

+1 binding. Very exciting! On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:37 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 5:55 PM Jed Cunningham > wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 08, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:06 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > I love to see the community casting non-binding votes. Thanks for the > participation folks! >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.1 from 2.5.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:13 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the helm chart with > a few different configs. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 14, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:43 AM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:13, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> :D >> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:06 PM Oliveira, Niko >> wrote: >> >>> > One comment Niko - for software release voting only PMC votes are >>>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-52 Automatic setup and teardown tasks

+1 binding On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:51 PM Drew Hubl wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Jan 9, 2023, at 10:10 AM, Elad Kalif wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 7:07 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:01 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis >> wrote: >> >>> +1

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 04, 2022

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:30 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 00:21, Daniel Standish > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> checked signatures checksums and licenses >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:31 PM Jed Cunningham >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> C

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Breeze rewrite to Python finally completed !!! Congrats to Bowrna, Edith (and Elad as mentor)!

Yes, the new Breeze is amazing! Really great work Bowrna, Edith, Jarek, and Elad 🎉 On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 AM Sumit Maheshwari wrote: > Awesome work Bowrna, Edith, and Jarek. 👏 > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:30 AM Felix Uellendall > wrote: > >> Congrats & Well done! I love the new breeze! 🤩

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 28, 2022

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 5:33 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 at 20:28, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > >> +1 binding >> >> >> On 30 September 2022 19:36:14 BST, Elad Kalif wrote: >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:36 AM Jed Cunningham <

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.4.1 from 2.4.1rc1

+1 (non-binding) Ran a few DAGs and tested some bug fixes too. On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 2:21 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > Kind bump, I need 1 more vote on this release. >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Tzu-ping Chung

Congrats TP! On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:22 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > Congratulations TP! Very well deserved! > > Vikram > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:55 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hello Airflow Community, >> >> I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee ( >> PMC) fo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Daniel Standish

Congrats Daniel! On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:23 AM Vikram Koka wrote: > Congratulations Daniel! Very well deserved! > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 12:57 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hello Airflow Community, >> >> I have the pleasure to announce that The Project Management Committee ( >> PMC) for Apa

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Pierre Jeaambrun

Here here! Congrats Pierre! On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 8:10 AM Brent Bovenzi wrote: > Congratulations Pierre! Very much well deserved! > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 3:51 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hello Airflow Community, >> >> I am happy to announce that The Project Management Committee (PMC) for

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] enable string normalization on black

+1 (binding) As a double-quote guy I'm in favor, but having consistency is more important than my style preferences. Love it. On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:50 PM Drew Hubl wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sep 21, 2022, at 10:03 AM, Daniel Standish < > daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: >

Re: Add To Dev List

Hi Ace! Anyone can subscribe (or unsubscribe) to any of the Airflow devlists via the instructions listed on the Community page . Josh On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:36 PM Ace Haidrey wrote: > Hi all, > > Can you please add d...@pinterest.com to the email dev l

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] consolidate scheduling params with new param `schedule`

+1 (binding) On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 2:55 PM Daniel Standish wrote: > Proposal: > >- add new DAG param `schedule` that accepts everything *currently > *supported >by `schedule_interval`, `timetable`, and `schedule_on` > - (note schedule_on, added for AIP-48, has not been in any rel

Re: [DISCUSS] consolidate dag scheduling params

Consolidating to a single scheduling parameter is a big +1 from me. `schedule` seems like a nice catch-all. On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 9:10 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 on moving to a single `schedule` param. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 13, 2022

+1 (non-binding) Validated a few enhancements and ran DAGs using some of the providers in this batch. On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 5:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.3 from 2.3.3rc3

+1 (non-binding) Ran some DAGs, verified some bug fixes. On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:32 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding). > > I double checked most of the changes I was involved with (updated > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24863), and reached out to users > who could help with ver

Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow

+1 (binding) Nice! On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:08 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > + 1 (binding) > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Phani Kumar > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding), let's do it ! >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen! >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 09, 2022 (rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes and enhancements. Also ran a few DAGs. On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:03 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours + 1.5 day for

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.2 from 2.3.2rc2

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes and ran a few DAGs with core operators. On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 2:46 PM Franklin Ferreira de Lima < franklinferreiradelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Grupo Light > > > > Enviado do meu smartphone Samsung Galaxy. > > Mensagem original > De: Je

Re: [VOTE] AIP-48 Data Driven Scheduling

+1 (binding) On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 9:31 AM Hila Sofer Elyashiv wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On 2022/06/01 16:34:13 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Now that Summit is over (well done all the speakers! The talks I've > > caught so far have been great) I'm ready to push forward with Da

Re: New Committer: Ping Zhang

Congrats Ping! On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:43 PM morefreeze wrote: > Congratulations. That's awesome! > > On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:12 AM wrote: > >> Congratulations!! >> >> On 30 May 2022, at 22:25, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >>  >> Congrats! >> >> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:20 PM Cong Zhu wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.0 from 2.3.0rc2

+1 (non-binding) Dynamic Task Mapping feels life-changing. On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:41 PM Abhishek Bhakat wrote: > Other than that issue, have tested the version and would like to change my > vote to +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 9:49 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.5 from 2.2.5rc3

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes, ran some DAGs using core modules. On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:37 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 (binding) - checked signatures, licences, checksums. Run a few > tests. Checked updated FAB version. All looks good. > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 11:12 AM Ephrai

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 23, 2022

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:24 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 26 > Mar 00:30:00 CET 2022. > > Conside

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 15, 2022

+1 (non-binding) Gave the new dbt Cloud provider a full runthrough. On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 2:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > We have almost all changes in this release tested now :). Looking > forward to a (hopefully) 100% test coverage :) (and voting on the > release too :)) > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on March 07, 2022

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few enhancements and fixes. Also ran a few DAGs with these providers. On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 6:22 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > The time passes today so I need some PMC votes. From the current release > status https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/

Re: "Release Notes" - rethinking our CHANGELOG and UPDATING docs

+1 Love this On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > @Leah Cole - PIP, Pytest, attrs uses Towncrier too, > you can take a look at the following links: > > >- https://pip.pypa.io/en/stable/news/ >- https://docs.pytest.org/en/7.0.x/changelog.html >- https://www.attrs.org/en

Re: Improving contributor experience for "trusted" users -- faster CI by using self-hosted runners

+1 On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 11:52 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Pushing code - true. But opening a PR requires either a UI access or > generated token (which has expiry and requires MFA). So you should not be > able to open multiple PRs with stolen SSH key. Which limits potential > damage you can do.

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Deprecate non-JSON extra, and require a dict

+1 Extra is required to be a JSON when connections are via in the UI now (a big hairy error message is displayed if it isn't) so hopefully that reduces blast radius for existing connections a bit. On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 7:41 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 at 12:35, Tomasz Ur

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 14, 2022 (rc3)

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few enhancements made. On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:57 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Thu 17 F

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers (based on rc2) prepared on February 09, 2022

+1 (non-binding) Verified some enhancements and ran a few DAGs with the providers involved in the RC. On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:31 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > We have good testing progress -> seems that we will have to > re-release oracle due to an edge backwards incompatibility (together with > t

Re: [VOTE] deprecate days_ago helper function

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 3:03 PM Drew Hubl wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Feb 4, 2022, at 11:59 AM, Dennis Akpenyi > wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > On Fri 4. Feb 2022 at 20:43, Daniel Standish < > daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > >> I suppose I should vote also...

Re: [DISCUSS] deprecate `days_ago` dates utility

+1 for deprecation as well. `days_ago()` was removed from example DAGs and other documentation since it was mainly being used for dynamic `start_date` values which is not a best practice in DAG authoring. Seemed to create more confusion and odd behavior than value. On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 7:00 PM

Re: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on December 31, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes and ran some DAGs involving some of the providers in this RC. On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 5:11 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:41 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> one more +1 needed :) >> >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:38 PM K

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.3 from 2.2.3rc2

+1 (non-binding) Verified a couple bug fixes and ran a few DAGs using core operators. On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 5:30 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:12 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> Verified licenses, signatures, checksums. Run Airflow with >> Celer

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 30, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Verified some enhancements/fixes as well as executed several DAGs with the providers included in this release. On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:55 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the rele

Re: [DISCUSS] Connection extra field widgets: long vs short name convention

To add a little wrinkle and small clarification here, there are some connection types that expose and use both classic Extra as well as customized fields in the connection form (Snowflake being the main example I can think of). As of 2.2, these two Extra options are being merged but not necessarily

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

+1 (non-binding) Very exciting On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:08 AM Daniel Imberman < > daniel.imber...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to call for a vote on AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping: >> >> AIP-42:

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.2 from 2.2.2rc2

+1 (non-binding) Verified some bug fixes and ran a few DAGs. On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 2:39 PM Leon Smith wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, 14 Nov 2021 at 16:28, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 (binding) - signatures/licences/checksums ok. Installed in Breeze >> and run sample dags - all looks g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 30, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Tested with several DAGs, verified a few bug fixes and new features. On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 9:52 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours + 1 day

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.2.1 from 2.2.1rc2

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:14 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (binding) > > śr., 27 paź 2021 o 22:45 Dennis Akpenyi > napisał(a): > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:40 PM Jed Cunningham >> wrote: >> >>> Hey fellow Airflowers, >>> >>> I have cut Airflow 2.2.1rc2.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 30, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few bug fixes and regression tested with a variety of DAGs. On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 9:40 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours + 1 da

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.4 from 2.1.4rc2

+1 (non-binding) - Verified the same issues and tested with the same DAGs as done with the previous RC On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 8:27 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hey All, >> >> +1 binding - signatures, sums, licences all

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.4 from 2.1.4rc1

+1 (non-binding) - Verified a few bug fixes and tested with a number of DAGs across core Airflow and providers. On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:24 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (non-binding) - tested the image with the helm chart and a fresh > install in a virtualenv with a (small) variety of DAGs >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 30, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Ran some DAGs across a few providers and tested some other fixes. On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:54 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Significant majority of the providers have been tried (and ~ half of the > PRs) see https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17922 (thanks to > contributors w

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.1.3 from RC1

+1 (non-binding) Verified a few fixes and ran some DAGs On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:56 AM wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, 11:29 Dennis Akpenyi > wrote: > >> +1 non-binding >> >> On Thu 19. Aug 2021 at 11:05, Elad Kalif wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 27, 2021 (rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Tested with a few DAGs using AWS, Salesforce, and Snowflake. On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 3:30 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > One more addition: Jeff noticed a mistake which I corrected, Salesforce > Provider was marked as "doc-only" change by mistake. I updated the docs and > added it to

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 15, 2021

+1 (non-binding) Tested both Amazon and Snowflake providers. On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:17 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hey all, > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > calling a vote on the release, > which will last for 72 hours + 1 day over the weekend - which