Makes sense to me. +1 On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 7:39 AM Pierre Jeambrun <pierrejb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > Le sam. 22 avr. 2023 à 08:51, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> a écrit : > > > Hello everyone, > > > > We have a few old unused git repositories that have been used in the past > > but now are defunct. Some of the old repos are marked as "archived" (i.e. > > read-only and with the "public archive" banner - for example this one > > https://github.com/apache/airflow-ci) but some of them are not (for > > example > > this one: https://github.com/apache/airflow-checks-action. And we keep > on > > receiving dependabot notification for those ... > > > > We should not really remove those - because for example actions might be > > used by someone in ASF (we shared the custom actions we used to have with > > other ASF projects). But we can archive them > > > > I just created an INFRA ticket to mark those old repos as archived > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24501 > > > > For the record - here is the list of repos I found that should be > archived: > > > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-checks-action > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-flask-openid-fork > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-helm-unittest > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-on-k8s-operator > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-openldap > > * https://github.com/apache/airflow-pgbouncer-exporter > > > > We can always go back and unarchive them if needs be. > > > > J. > > >
