Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.2 from 2.9.2rc1

+1 non binding On Sat, 8 Jun 2024, 15:02 Hussein Awala, wrote: > +1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums, licences and sources. > > On Saturday, June 8, 2024, rom sharon wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] May 2024 PR of the Month

Tough to choose, but my vote goes to #39336, thanks to Daniel Standish. On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 7:44 AM Mehta, Shubham wrote: > Great contributions from everyone. Thanks Daniel for clean up with #39336, > and thank you Kaxil for leading the scarf discussion, I'm looking forward > to more data.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 12, 2024

+1 non-binding - verified that our example DAGs using amazon, google and Azure providers are running fine On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:30 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding - verified sigs & checksums > > On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 08:00, Utkarsh Sharma > wrote: > > > Verified Amazon provider changes,

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for adding Telemetry via Scarf

+1 binding, looking forward to add Scarf On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7f6qyr8w2n8w34g63s7ybhzphgt8h43m > > I would like to officially call for a vote to add Scarf as a Telemetry > tool. Some other things: > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Lee

Congratulations Wei , very well deserved ! On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:28 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > Many congratulations, Wei! > > Welcome onboard! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 2:26 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Congrats Wei! Indeed, well deserved! > > > > On Mon,

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.9.0 from 2.9.0rc3

+1 non binding.Verified by running few example DAGs On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:17 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified running example DAGs and performed UI sanity. LGTM! > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 09:43, Amogh Desai wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-62 Getting Lineage from Hook Instrumentation

+1 binding. Looking forward to this On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:06 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +0.9 (binding) I like the idea of this AIP, but I have not followed the > entire implementation of AIP-53 to understand the need for the proposed > implementation and discuss it, but I look forward to

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for adding Telemetry via Scarf

+1 I agree with this proposal. On Sat, 30 Mar 2024, 11:34 Aritra Basu, wrote: > +1 yeah, this sounds useful to me > > -- > Regards, > Aritra Basu > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2024, 6:58 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1. All that sounds reasonable, there are precedents, ASF supports Scarf > > officially.

Re: [VOTE] AIP-64: Keep TaskInstance try history

+1 binding - looking forward to this one On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 binding > > I like the thought behind this and understand why this was repeatedly asked > by the community. > Good work on the proposal so far! > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Tue, Mar

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.2 from 2.8.2rc3

+1 non-binding On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 4:00 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) ran the same checks and tests as the RC2; all look good. > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 8:22 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding): installed RC3 and ran a few DAGs. Tested reproducibility, > > licences,

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024

+1 non-binding. On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it. > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 26, 2024

+1 non binding On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 3:55 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > No regressions from the last rc. > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 at 2:02 PM, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 2:08 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) I did the

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

+1 non binding On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:30 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Installed the RC with helm charts, tried a couple of installation > configurations > and ran a few examples, not seeing any regression. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:16 

Re: [VOTE] New Airflow Community Provider: Teradata

+1 non binding On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:43 PM K Mallam, Sunil wrote: > Hello Airflow Community, > > Thank you very much for your comments/feedback on the Discussion Thread. > > I’m creating this voting thread for Teradata to be Airflow’s new community > provider. > > We have one 1 binding

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 07, 2024

+1 non binding On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 3:31 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 7:14 PM Aritra Basu > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Aritra Basu > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024, 11:38 PM Pankaj Singh > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] December PR of the Month

My vote goes to #35719 On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 1:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > OK. Let the fight begin now :) > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:15 AM Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > My vote goes to #35719. Having a nice UI fix come in, that too from a > first > > time contributor > > makes it a winner for

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 31, 2023

+1 non binding. On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 9:48 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 5:14 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Cool. Now I just need 2 binding +1s :) > > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 5:04 PM utkarsh sharma > > wrote: > > > > > +1(non-binding) tested my

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 28, 2023

+1 non binding On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, 16:10 Amogh Desai, wrote: > +1 non binding for providers apart from weavite > > Tested few dags around cncf provider mainly. Could not see any regressions. > > Thanks, > Amogh > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 4:08 PM, Pankaj Singh > wrote: > > > + 1 (non-binding)

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 23, 2023

+1 non binding On Sun, 24 Dec 2023, 09:16 utkarsh sharma, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my changes in apache-airflow-providers-weaviate==1.2.0rc1 > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 10:16 PM Rahul Vats > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > We have also tested

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc1

+1 non binding On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 5:10 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Installed the RC and was able to trigger a DAG successfully using the > client. > > Best regards, > > *Pankaj Koti* > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) > Location: Pune, Maharashtra,

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc4

+1 non binding On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 4:13 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) I checked the checksums, the signatures, the licences and the > sources, I also ran some testing dags with Breeze. all looks good. > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:17 AM Wei Lee wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.0 from 2.8.0rc3

+1 non binding On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 11:19 AM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Concurring with Rahul > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2023, 11:01 Rahul Vats, wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > >- Verified that running our example DAGs did not reveal any > regressions. > >- Verified the

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 12, 2023

-1 non binding. We are finding failures in astro sdk DAGs after using the databricks and google RC. We are working on creating PRs for the fixes. FAILED tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'asDict' FAILED

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Utkarsh Sharma

Congratulations Utkarsh ! Well deserved On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:13 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > [filling-in for Kaxil who is less available nowadays and travelling without > much access to computer] > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Airflow > has invited

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 24, 2023

+1 non binding On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding. > > Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around > apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes > & apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala. > Things seem to be working fine. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Suspend/Remove Apache Scoop provider

+1 On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 8:24 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 > > On 2023/11/23 13:08:09 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > +1 > > > > czw., 23 lis 2023, 12:39 użytkownik Aritra Basu < > aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> > > napisał: > > > > > +1 sounds like a good reason to suspend it and eventually remove it. > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 08, 2023

+1 non binding On Sat, 11 Nov 2023, 20:30 Kaxil Naik, wrote: > Changing my vote to: +1 binding > > Forgot that common.io will be one of the dependency of Airflow similar to > common.sql > < > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/9cfb1a82f3b00fa70a7b5ce6818a9e618512de63/setup.py#L829-L830 > >

Re: [VOTE] Add providers for Pinecone, OpenAI & Cohere to enable first-class LLMOps

+1 binding On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 16:39 utkarsh sharma, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 4:10 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023, 06:32 Andrey Anshin, > > wrote: > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 18, 2023

+1 non-binding On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 1:25 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Tested apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.9.0rc1 and > apache-airflow-providers-google==10.10.1rc1. Both of them work as expected. > > Best, > Wei > > > On Oct 19, 2023, at 2:24 PM, Amogh Desai > wrote: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on October 13, 2023

+1 non binding On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:27 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) I checked my changes, and all looks good. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:52 AM utkarsh sharma > wrote: > > > +1 Non binding > > > > Thanks, > > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:06 PM Rahul Vats >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 non binding On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, 03:29 Hussein Awala, wrote: > +1 (binding) I tested the fix and it looks good. > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:18 PM utkarsh sharma > wrote: > > > +1 non binding > > > > Thanks, > > Utkarsh Sharma > > > > On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 at 9:17 PM, Pierre Jeambrun > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.2 from 2.7.2rc1

+1 non-binding On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 7:49 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 05:14, Jed Cunningham > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences, compared sources. Used it with > the > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Pankaj Koti and Amogh Desai as committers

Congrats Pankaj and Amogh! Very well deserved! On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:45 PM Rahul Vats wrote: > Congratulations Pankaj and Amogh. > > On Tue, 19 Sep, 2023, 20:22 Hussein Awala, wrote: > > > Congrats Pankaj and Amogh! > > > > Hussein > > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:45 PM Andrey Anshin > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 14, 2023

+1 non-binding On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 3:45 PM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested with the following on our example DAGs without encountering errors. > > * apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.7.1rc1 > * apache-airflow-providers-google==10.9.0rc1 > *

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 12, 2023

+1 non binding On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:03 PM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Tested with a few dags from my test set. No regression from the last RC. > > Thanks, > Amogh Desai > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 15:19 Pankaj Koti .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Our

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on September 08, 2023

+1 non binding On Mon, 11 Sept 2023, 01:39 Pankaj Koti, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 1. Tested my set of changes in PR #34018. > 2. astronomer-providers DAGs ran fine for below list of RCs: > apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.7.0rc1 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.1 from 2.7.1rc2

+1 non binding On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:16 AM Rahul Vats wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested our example DAGS, looks good! > > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 11:09, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > tested several of my dags. looks good! > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Drop MsSQL as supported backend

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:10 PM Andrey Anshin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > RIP MS SQL as a backend > > > Best Wishes > *Andrey Anshin* > > > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 09:04, Daniel Imberman > wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 10:01 PM Ryan Hatter > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 26, 2023

+1 non binding. On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, 23:04 Ankit Chaurasia, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) as we will exclude microsoft.azure. > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:56 PM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > Since Azure will get an

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc2

+1 non-binding On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 8:10 AM Wei Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Aug 17, 2023, at 4:50 AM, Brent Bovenzi > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:46 PM Pierre Jeambrun > > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) Checksum, signatures,

Re: [VOTE] Restore dag_run.conf UI triggering option for 2.7.0

+1 non binding On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, 23:17 Hussein Awala, wrote: > Thank you Jarek for raising this vote. > > +1 (binding) > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 7:39 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, 23:06 Jarek Potiuk, wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.7.0 from 2.7.0rc1

+1 non-binding On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 3:05 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (binding) I checked the signatures, the checksums, the licences and the > source code.All looks good. > I ran some testing dags in CeleryExecutor in normal and deferrable modes. > The new Cluster Activity page is amazing!

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 11, 2023

+1 non-binding On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 5:48 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Concur with Wei & Rahul. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > Email:

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 09, 2023

+1 non binding. On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 10:53 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding. > > No regressions from the previous RC2. > > CNCF providers are running fine. > > Thanks, > Amogh Desai > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:10 PM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). > > > > I concur with

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 05, 2023

+1 non binding On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 4:29 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my set of changes. Verified they are included in the RCs, ran tests > and ensured they work as expected. > Thank you for including these. > > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 29, 2023

+1 non binding On Sun, 30 Jul 2023, 20:54 Hussein Awala, wrote: > +1 (binding) I tested my change and I checked the signatures, the checksums > and the source code. > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 4:18 PM rahul Vats wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I have tested our example DAGS with the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Hussein Awala

Congrats Hussein On Sun, 30 Jul 2023, 10:49 Elad Kalif, wrote: > Congrats! well deserved! > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 5:36 AM Wei Lee wrote: > > > Congratulations!  > > > > Best, > > Wei > > > > > On Jul 30, 2023, at 1:39 AM, Pankaj Koti .INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > > > Many

Re: [VOTE] PR of the Month for the Airflow Newsletter

+1 for #31712 On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 4:53 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 for #32525. > > Seems like a great contribution for AIP-56. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) > > Email:

Re: Config as default value for deferrable may have surprising effect ?

As discussed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/29014#discussion_r1073723719 , we might want to follow the below generic rules(similar to what Pankaj mentioned) 1. When wait_for_termination=True and deferrable=False, we submit and "poll" on the worker 2. When

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 17, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 4:39 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 9:28 AM Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Verified that remote logging using Elasticsearch works well with the > > changes in the RC. > > Thank you for the

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 12, 2023

+1 non-binding. On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 7:10 PM rahul Vats wrote: > Thanks, Elad for letting me know. > Regards, > Rahul Vats > 9953794332 > > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 17:09, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > Rahul the changelog will be published on release. it is not available yet > > on the doc site.

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.3 from 2.6.3rc1

+1 non-binding. Ran some example DAGs and verified that they ran successfully On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 9:23 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences, and compared code to the tag. Used > it with the helm chart with a few different config. >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 06, 2023

+1 non binding On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:43 PM Vincent Beck wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > I tested the amazon provider package by running my testing dags > > On 2023/07/07 12:48:07 Pankaj Koti wrote: > > *Change of vote: +1 (non-binding)* > > Since ES RC is being excluded I have no other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Dennis Ferruzzi

Congratulations Dennis ! On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:55 AM Wei Lee wrote: > Congratulations :) > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jul 5, 2023, at 2:51 AM, utkarsh sharma > wrote: > > > > Congratulations!! :) > > > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 at 11:38 PM, Pankaj Singh > > wrote: > > > >> congratulations! > >> >

Re: [VOTE] June 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for #31123 On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, 20:28 Kaxil Naik, wrote: > +1 for #31123  > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 14:33, Pankaj Koti .invalid> > wrote: > > > Yes, +1 also from me for #31123. > > Thank you for the poll! > > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, 18:59 Jarek Potiuk, wrote: > > > > > Big +1 for #31123

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.10.0 based on 1.10.0rc1

+1 non-binding On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 7:09 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue 27 Jun 2023 at 15:31, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:21 PM Pankaj Koti > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Installed the RC on Docker

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

+1 non-binding. On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 12:52 PM utkarsh sharma wrote: > +1 non binding > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 12:38 PM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Installed the RC and triggered an example DAG run. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Pankaj Koti > > > > *Senior

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 20, 2023

+1 non binding Tested #30279 , #31685 , #31081 ,#31317 , #31249 ,

Re: [VOTE] AIP-56 Extensible user management

+1 non binding On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:39 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Fyi . Your voice is binding Hussein . pMC members have binding voices for > releases, bit committees have binding voice for all thr regular decisions.. > > wt., 20 cze 2023, 08:45 użytkownik Hussein Awala > napisał: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc2

+1 non binding. Tested our integration DAGs and they are running fine On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 4:09 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 (non binding) tested my changes and run testing DAGs > > On Thu 15 Jun 2023 at 23:59, Beck, Vincent > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Tested against my testing

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.2 from 2.6.2rc1

+ non-binding. Ran our example DAGs successfully On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 5:34 AM Oliveira, Niko wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > checked files, licenses, signatures, checksums, installation, and a few > example dags. > > Cheers, > Niko > > > From: Beck, Vincent >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Pankaj Singh

Congrats Pankaj! On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 7:17 AM Wei Lee wrote: > Congrats Pankaj!  > > > On Jun 13, 2023, at 8:30 AM, Pankaj Koti > wrote: > > > > Many congratulations, Pankaj!! 拾 > > > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, 05:38 Vikram Koka, > > wrote: > > > >> Awesome! Congratulations Pankaj Singh! > >>

Re: Deferrable operators in system tests, how?

My preference would be Option 2 as that is closest to prod. Our approach is to spin up Airflow , install the providers that currently have deferrable functionality, and run system tests on those example DAGs on a daily basis . We are also running them on multiple executors (Celery, Kubernetes

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on May 24, 2023

+1 non binding . Tested microsoft.azure: 6.1.1rc1 and it works as expected On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:16 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Concurring with Wei. > > On Wed, 24 May 2023, 21:09 Wei Lee, wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc1

+1 non-binding On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 1:15 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified that installing the package from the RC works well, triggered an > example DAG using the client and saw that it worked fine. > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.1 from 2.6.1rc3

+1 non-binding On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:02 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > +1 binding > > tested example dags. looks good. > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 9:32 PM Pankaj Singh > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:49 PM Pankaj Koti > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc4

+1 non-binding On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 7:43 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:00 AM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > > > I have cut Airflow 2.6.0rc4. This email is calling a vote on the release, >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 26, 2023

+1 non-binding On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 1:58 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 2023/04/26 09:50:45 Elad Kalif wrote: > > Hey all,I have just cut the ad hoc *RC3* release for Airflow Providers > > packages (Amazon provider only). This email is calling a vote on the > >

Re: [VOTE] April 2023 PR of the Month

+1 for #30705 On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:02 PM Hussein Awala wrote: > +1 for #30705 > > On Wed 26 Apr 2023 at 19:23, Pankaj Singh > wrote: > > > +1 for #30705 as it has reduced CI execution drastically. > > > > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 6:47 PM Hemkumar Chheda > > wrote: > > > > > My vote goes

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.6.0 from 2.6.0rc1

+1 non-binding On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 4:07 PM Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > +1 (Non-binding) Tested with AstroSDK. > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > > Drums rolling . > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 10:18 AM Ephraim Anierobi < > >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 21, 2023

+1 non binding On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 2:25 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 non-binding > > We tested the following 7 RCs on our example DAGs. > 1. https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/8.0.0rc1/ > 2. > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/6.1.0rc1/ >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 09, 2023

+1 non-binding - tested amazon RC and it works well On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 6:32 PM Utkarsh Sharma wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Sharma > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 4:56 AM Hussein Awala wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > From: Jarek

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 02, 2023

flow Providers prepared on April 02, 2023 > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:42 AM Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Phani, > > > > no this is not yet merged. Once merged it will be released in the &g

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on April 02, 2023

Is it possible to include https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30370 in the amazon RC ? It fixes a bug in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/30090. On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 11:02 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > +1 binding. Tested my changes (at least where I could), verified checksums, >

Re: [VOTE] March PR of the Month

My vote goes to [28850] by @pankajastro: "Add deferrable mode in RedshiftPauseClusterOperator " , as it formed the base for us to implement several deferrable operators on AWS. On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 11:43 AM Jorrick Sleijster wrote: > Some great

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc2

+1 non-binding On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:14 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 08:36, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > +1 (binding) checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:23 AM Pankaj Singh > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.5.2 from 2.5.2rc1

+1 non-binding On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:24 PM Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 (non-binding). Our DAG ran fine against this RC. > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 8:50 AM Josh Fell .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 4:43 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > > > +1 binding >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 18, 2023

+1 non-binding. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 2:22 PM Rajath Srinivasaiah wrote: > +1 non-binding. All of our dags ran fine. > > > Thanks and Regards, > Rajath S > rajath.srinivasa...@astronomer.io > > [image: image.png] > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 1:15 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> +1 binding. I

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 08, 2023

+1 non-binding On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 7:34 PM Pankaj Singh wrote: > +1 non-binding > > We tested our *astro-sdk *and > astronomer-providers > tests > on rc's. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 7:18 PM

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 14, 2023

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:51 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > Our example DAGs ran fine for the following 7 RCs: > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/7.1.0rc1/ >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on January 02, 2023 - RC2

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 2:56 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 14, 2022 (RC1)

+1 (non-binding) . Our DAGs ran successfully. On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 10:31 PM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences. > > Thanks for doing this release Elad  >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on December 1st, 2022 (RC1)

+1 non-binding On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 3:12 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 non-binding. > > Tested the Snowflake RC and our DAG ran fine with it. > > Regards, > > > > Pankaj Koti > > *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team. > Location: Pune, India > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) >

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 26, 2022 (RC3)

+1 non-binding. All our DAGs ran successfully with the below providers. apache-airflow-providers-amazon==6.2.0rc3, apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.3.1rc3, apache-airflow-providers-databricks==4.0.0rc3, apache-airflow-providers-google==8.6.0rc3, apache-airflow-providers-snowflake==4.0.1rc3

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on November 15, 2022

+1 non binding. Tested for the RC versions below and they worked as expected. "apache-airflow-providers-amazon==6.1.0rc1, apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive==4.1.0rc1, apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy==3.2.0rc1, apache-airflow-providers-common-sql==1.3.0rc1,

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.4.2 from 2.4.2rc1

+1 non-binding. Tested that our DAG's are running fine with this image On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 7:02 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello all, > > +1 (binding). > > Looks solid. Tested it locally a bit, verified signatures. checksums, > licences > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:32 PM Jeambrun Pierre >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.7.0 based on 1.7.0rc1

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 5:41 PM Dennis Akpenyi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:00 PM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 at 18:32, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: >> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> On Oct

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.4.0 from 2.4.0rc1

+ non binding. Tested the Dataset functionality and working fine On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 11:09 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 at 16:57, Jeambrun Pierre > wrote: > >> + 1 (non-binding) >> >> Tested a few DAGs and more extensively grid related changes.

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on 2022-09-05

+1 non-binding. Tested that the RC amazon provider contains the new operator(EmrEksCreateClusterOperator) and is running fine. On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 4:00 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > :faceplam:. For clarity the vote will end on Thursday, 2022-09-08 at 15:56 > UTC. > > On Mon, Sep 5 2022 at

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 15, 2022 (RC4)

+1 (non binding). Our databricks DAG ran fine with the databricks 3.2.0rc4 On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 5:10 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > +1 (binding) verified licenses, checksum & signatures > > On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 at 10:53, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have just cut the new wave

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on August 10, 2022 (rc3)

+1 (non binding) On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:35 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > We need one more vote :) > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 2:33 PM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) verified files, licenses, signatures & checksum >> >> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 14:40, Jarek

Re: [VOTE] AIP-44 - Airflow Internal API

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:50 PM Igor Kholopov wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Igor > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 7:16 PM Ping Zhang wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ping >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 1:42 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >>> Hey everyone, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow Python Client 2.3.0 based on 2.3.0rc1

+1 non-binding. I am able to install the RC package , made changes to the local airflow config to use basic authentication to run some basic client calls . Observed the same issue as Jarek while executing the test_python_client.py. On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 4:47 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 13, 2022

+1 (non-binding) Validated the test connection button for the providers I had modified, and ran the TrinoOperator successfully On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 7:56 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested a few RCs and they seem to work fine. > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 19:53, Josh Fell >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.3 from 2.3.3rc3

+1 (non binding) On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 8:35 PM Ephraim Anierobi wrote: > Hey fellow Airflowers, > > I have cut Airflow 2.3.3rc3. This email is calling a vote on the release, > which will last at least 72 hours, from Wednesday, July 6, 2022, at 3:04 > pm UTC > until Saturday, July 9, 2022, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.3.3 from 2.3.3rc1

+1 non-binding Ran example_python_operator DAG after bringing up airflow using 2.3.3rc1 image. It ran successfully. On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 5:18 PM Pankaj Koti wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Used the RC as a base-image, installed astronomer-providers[google], ran > an example DAG for testing the

Re: Please vote on the PR of the Month for this month's Airflow Newsletter!

I also vote for 24249 :) On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 7:23 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Let the fight begin :) > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 3:43 PM Brent Bovenzi > wrote: > > > > I also vote for 24249 > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 9:39 AM Kaxil Naik wrote: > >> > >> Love 24249 -

Re: [VOTE] AIP-49 OpenTelemetry Support for Apache Airflow

+1 (non-binding), let's do it ! On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:29 PM Igor Kholopov wrote: > +1 (non-binding), let's make it happen! > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:12 PM Tomasz Urbaszek > wrote: > >> +1 (binding), OpenTelemetry is great! >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 22:14, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-48 Data Driven Scheduling

+1 non-binding On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 1:21 PM Dennis Akpenyi wrote: > +1 non-binding > > On Thu 2. Jun 2022 at 09:45, Pankaj Koti wrote: > >> +1 non-binding >> >> On Thu, 2 Jun 2022 at 01:50, Kaxil Naik wrote: >> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 at 19:37, Drew Hubl >>> wrote: >>>