+1 binding. Looking forward to this On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 5:06 AM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:
> +0.9 (binding) I like the idea of this AIP, but I have not followed the > entire implementation of AIP-53 to understand the need for the proposed > implementation and discuss it, but I look forward to seeing it in Airflow. > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 1:23 PM Jakub Dardziński <kuba0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). It will enable long-awaited enriched support for > > PythonOperator > > > > pt., 29 mar 2024 o 22:23 Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> napisał(a): > > > > > +1 (binding). I think that's a really important missing piece in > lineage > > > integration. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:47 PM Maciej Obuchowski < > > mobuchow...@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to start a vote on AIP-62: Getting Lineage from Hook > > > > Instrumentation, to be implemented into (presumably) Airflow 2.10. > > > > > > > > The AIP can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-62+Getting+Lineage+from+Hook+Instrumentation > > > > > > > > Discussion Thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/5chxcp0zjcx66d3vs4qlrm8kl6l4s3m2 > > > > > > > > The vote will last until 2024-04-03 18:00 UTC and until at least 3 > > > binding > > > > votes have been cast. > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > [ ] + 1 approve > > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion > > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other > > members > > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with > > > > "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > Consider this my binding +1 vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Maciej > > > > > > > > > >
