Hi all,
The vote for AIP-79 and AIP 84 has passed.
AIP-79
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-79%3A+Remove+Flask+AppBuilder+as+Core+dependency
AIP-84 UI REST API
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-84+UI+REST+API
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.or
+1 (binding
On Mon 5 Aug 2024 at 08:17, Ephraim Anierobi
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 03:58, Vishnu Chilukoori
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) for both
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding) for both APIs
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Wei
> >
+1 (binding)
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 at 03:58, Vishnu Chilukoori
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) for both
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) for both APIs
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding) for both
+1 (non-binding) for both
On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 7:07 PM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (binding) for both APIs
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding) for both
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Je
+1 (binding) for both APIs
Best,
Wei
> On Aug 5, 2024, at 4:00 AM, Shahar Epstein wrote:
>
> +1 (binding) for both
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web
>> Application for Airflow 3.0
+1 (binding) for both
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:20 PM Brent Bovenzi
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web
> Application for Airflow 3.0. We would like to open it up for a vote.
>
> AIP-79
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/A
+1 non-binding
-- Rajesh
On 2024-08-02, 1:51 PM, "Buğra Öztürk" mailto:ozturkbugr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
AVERTISS
+1 non-binding
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 6:20 PM Elad Kalif wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> I am not sure I agree with previous statements regarding the LDAP issue
> (specifically about blocker or not blocker for Airflow 3) but let's not
> discuss this here as it's out of scope for the AIPs we are voting h
+1 binding
I am not sure I agree with previous statements regarding the LDAP issue
(specifically about blocker or not blocker for Airflow 3) but let's not
discuss this here as it's out of scope for the AIPs we are voting here.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 7:15 PM Vincent Beck wrote:
> Big +1 to this
Big +1 to this one. I think this is the major blocker on that workstream:
deciding which tool we want to leverage to build the default auth manager for
Airflow 3. Once that decision taken I'll be happy to help to implement the auth
manager based upon that tool.
On 2024/08/02 16:06:00 Jarek Pot
Yeah. KeyCloak was just a repeating theme in a number of questions/issues
some users raised (How do I integrate with KeyCloak) and it's well
recognized in enterprise. But this is about as much as I know about it :)
So yeah, if we have anyone who can dig deeper in the options we have or
ideally som
Agreed Jarek on the parallel workstream for auth and also that should not
be a blocker for 3.0.
I don't know if the right answer is actually Keycloak. There was some
research done by my colleagues within Astronomer using Casbin for the same,
but I don't know the differences between those and other
Yeah. And (a little tangential) - I really feel that we should have a
separate parallel workstream `Implement "proper" Auth Manager` (for example
authorizing users via Keycloak) - which should be creating a new provider.
Note that this provider should NOT have a way to manage users and roles -
it s
> Just to verify, users will still be able connect FAB to LDAP by installing
> FAB provider explicitly?
Yes. That and configuring the FAB auth manager as the auth manager, as it
won't be the default most likely. Being able to maintain that is a primary
goal of this AIP.
> But I want to make sur
Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: Michał Modras
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:23 PM
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder
al Message-----
> > From: Michał Modras
> > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:23 PM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core
> > Dependency & UI REST API
> >
> > +1 for both, n
Grosch, Dr. Markus Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michał Modras
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:23 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core
> Dependency &
Heyn, Dr. Frank Meyer, Dr. Tanja Rückert
-Original Message-
From: Michał Modras
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:23 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-79 & AIP-84 Remove Flask AppBuilder as a Core
Dependency & UI REST API
+1 for both, non-binding
On Thu, Aug
+1 for both, non-binding
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:34 PM Igor Kholopov
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding, both)
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:04 PM Vikram Koka
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding on both AIP-79 and AIP-84.
> >
> > Vikram
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 11:35 AM Vincent Beck
> wrote:
> >
> > > +
+1 (non-binding, both)
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:04 PM Vikram Koka
wrote:
> +1 binding on both AIP-79 and AIP-84.
>
> Vikram
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 11:35 AM Vincent Beck wrote:
>
> > +1 binding for both
> >
> > On 2024/08/01 18:33:51 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> > > +1 binding!
> > >
> >
> > --
+1 binding on both AIP-79 and AIP-84.
Vikram
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 11:35 AM Vincent Beck wrote:
> +1 binding for both
>
> On 2024/08/01 18:33:51 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> > +1 binding!
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
+1 binding for both
On 2024/08/01 18:33:51 Jed Cunningham wrote:
> +1 binding!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
+1 binding!
Hi,
Jed and I prepared two AIPs to flesh out how to finish AIP-38 Modern Web
Application for Airflow 3.0. We would like to open it up for a vote.
AIP-79
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-79%3A+Remove+Flask+AppBuilder+as+Core+dependency
AIP-84 UI REST API
https://cwiki.apach
24 matches
Mail list logo
