+1 (non-binding)
--
Regards,
Aritra Basu
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023, 4:10 PM Rahul Vats wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
> 9953794332
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 13:25, Andrey Anshin
> wrote:
>
> > Tested my changes
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> >
> > Best Wishes
> > *Andrey
+1(non-binding)
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 13:25, Andrey Anshin
wrote:
> Tested my changes
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> Best Wishes
> *Andrey Anshin*
>
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 10:30, utkarsh sharma
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Utkarsh
Tested my changes
+1 (non binding)
Best Wishes
*Andrey Anshin*
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 10:30, utkarsh sharma wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Utkarsh Sharma
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:59 AM Phani Kumar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM Amo
+1 (non binding)
Thanks,
Utkarsh Sharma
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:59 AM Phani Kumar
wrote:
> +1 non binding
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM Amogh Desai
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non binding.
> >
> > Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around
> > apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes
> > &
+1 non binding
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:34 AM Amogh Desai
wrote:
> +1 non binding.
>
> Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around
> apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes
> & apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala.
> Things seem to be working fine.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
+1 non binding.
Tested some of my example DAGs, mostly around
apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes
& apache-airflow-providers-apache-impala.
Things seem to be working fine.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 9:52 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> We tested it with
+1 (non-binding)
We tested it with our example DAGs with "apache-airflow-providers-amazon",
"apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes",
"apache-airflow-providers-databricks", "apache-airflow-providers-dbt-cloud",
"apache-airflow-providers-google", "apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes",
"a
+1 (binding)
Had some fun discussion changes. Sorry for the fuss :-).
B.
On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 21:41, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Tested my template changes, signatures, checksum, licences, sources are all
> good.
>
> I also tested that reproducible builds work great ! I checked ou
+1 (binding)
Tested my template changes, signatures, checksum, licences, sources are all
good.
I also tested that reproducible builds work great ! I checked out the tag
from sources, ran `breeze release-management prepare-provider-packages` and
got the packages built locally which had 100% binary
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my set of changes, all work fine. Thank you for the release efforts!
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 a
+1 (binding): checked signatures, checksums, licences, sources and tested
my changes; all looks good.
On Fri 24 Nov 2023 at 20:30, Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hou
Hey all,
I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on November 27,
2023 18:30 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
Airflow Pr
12 matches
Mail list logo