[RESULT] [VOTE] Bulk release provider packages 1.0.0 form 1.0.0rc1

2020-12-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
The vote has now closed. The results are: Binding Votes: +1: 4 (Me, Kaxil, Kamil, Jarek) 0: 0 -1: 0 The vote is successful. -Ash On Mon, 14 Dec, 2020 at 22:00, Jarek Potiuk wrote: + 1 (binding). Checked with RAT, GPG, SHA. Also, all our tests in CI are using those PyPI-released providers

Re: [VOTE] Bulk release provider packages 1.0.0 form 1.0.0rc1

2020-12-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
+ 1 (binding). Checked with RAT, GPG, SHA. Also, all our tests in CI are using those PyPI-released providers to build production images and to test if all providers can be installed and are properly discovered (both sdist and wheels). Most of all we checked today that the providers work properly w

Re: [VOTE] Bulk release provider packages 1.0.0 form 1.0.0rc1

2020-12-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:39 PM Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 > > At first, the source code was missing, but luckily we found it and now > everything looks fine. > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > >> HI all, >> >> To go alongside the vote for releasing apa

Re: [VOTE] Bulk release provider packages 1.0.0 form 1.0.0rc1

2020-12-14 Thread Kamil Breguła
+1 At first, the source code was missing, but luckily we found it and now everything looks fine. On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:59 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > HI all, > > To go alongside the vote for releasing apache-airflow-providers-* 1.0.0 > from rc1, this email calls for the vote on the provi

[VOTE] Bulk release provider packages 1.0.0 form 1.0.0rc1

2020-12-09 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
HI all, To go alongside the vote for releasing apache-airflow-providers-* 1.0.0 from rc1, this email calls for the vote on the provider packages, all 61 of them. The vote which will run for four and a half days, until 2020-12-14T10:00:00Z