Re: What goes into the next release (was [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1)

2024-01-17 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I think if anything - that should be a separate page in our GitHub - which will be a) easier to do b) maybe indeed makes sense c) this is where we put "developer" docs. I think we agreed already quite some time ago that "airflow.apache.org" is generally for the users and all the docs for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Andrey Anshin (taragolis)

2024-01-17 Thread Pankaj Koti
Many congratulations Andrey (taragolis :) ) Very very well deserved  Best regards, *Pankaj Koti* Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team) Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST) Phone: +91 9730079985 On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:03 PM Mehta,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Adding support for Qdrant provider

2024-01-17 Thread Anush Shetty
Hey guys. Just pushed the integration tests for the Qdrant provider with the CI configurations as requested and some refactoring for the Qdrant hook to remove redundancy. On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 19:58, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > self hosted image and the cloud offering, comprehensive integration

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

2024-01-17 Thread Phani Kumar
+1 non binding On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:30 AM Amogh Desai wrote: > +1 non binding > > Installed the RC with helm charts, tried a couple of installation > configurations > and ran a few examples, not seeing any regression. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:16 

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

2024-01-17 Thread Amogh Desai
+1 non binding Installed the RC with helm charts, tried a couple of installation configurations and ran a few examples, not seeing any regression. Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:16 AM Jed Cunningham wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked signatures, checksums, licences.

Re: What goes into the next release (was [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1)

2024-01-17 Thread Amogh Desai
Thanks @Jarek Potiuk ! I vaguely knew the process but not in such detail, thanks for putting it together in this email. I will visit the document https://github.com/apache/airflow?tab=readme-ov-file#what-goes-into-the-next-release and if I find any clarifications, I will send it across as a PR.

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

2024-01-17 Thread Jed Cunningham
+1 (binding) Checked signatures, checksums, licences. Used it with the helm chart with a few different configs

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

2024-01-17 Thread Ephraim Anierobi
Hi Bolke, Thanks for checking up on this release. The changes in Airflow.io are mostly improvement changes and this is a patch release. In patch releases, we don't include improvement changes and new features. We only include bug fixes, doc changes, and miscellaneous changes that are not core to

What goes into the next release (was [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1)

2024-01-17 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I separate it out, because it seems that despite the efforts to explain and document how our releases work It's not clear even for the PMC chair, so likely it warrants a separate thread - also it will be easier to find it in the archives this way. I think this is an important topic that all

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 2.8.1 from 2.8.1rc1

2024-01-17 Thread Bolke de Bruin
Just checking: I see that some improvements to Airflow.io (two weeks ago) were not included and some provider updates neither. Haven't checked anything else yet. Is that intentional? Ie. is that the purpose of this release. Other big(ger) and more recent changes have been included hence