Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-09-09 Thread Chris Riccomini
> Maybe we should keep them for Airflow 1.8. +1 On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Alex Van Boxel wrote: > Hey Maxime, I started to list them all and seems to be a lot of them (one > depending on the other). I think they had some breaking changes. Maybe we > should keep them for Airflow 1.8. I'll

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-28 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Hey Maxime, I started to list them all and seems to be a lot of them (one depending on the other). I think they had some breaking changes. Maybe we should keep them for Airflow 1.8. I'll keep running on master for now. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 1:59 AM Jakob Homan wrote: > ASF provides per-proje

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-23 Thread Jakob Homan
ASF provides per-projects blog infrastructure: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-blogs -Jakob On 23 August 2016 at 15:07, Maxime Beauchemin wrote: > I'm planning on working on a minimal apache release this week. If someone > can point to the commit or PRs I can add them to `branch-1.7.2-apache`

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-23 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
I'm planning on working on a minimal apache release this week. If someone can point to the commit or PRs I can add them to `branch-1.7.2-apache` and start moving towards the release. Max On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Alex Van Boxel wrote: > All stuff is in master (I'm running pre-production

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-23 Thread Alex Van Boxel
All stuff is in master (I'm running pre-production on master), if it needs to be cherry-picked to a branch I can always test it. I would be grate if it's in the next release so I can start blogging about it. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:05 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote: > (Sorry for the late response, I

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-23 Thread Bolke de Bruin
(Sorry for the late response, I was on holiday) I think the G* operators just need to be cherry picked. This will make us deviate slightly from the previous release, but makes sure we don’t have to ‘fix’ history afterwards. Anyone against this? - B. > Op 8 aug. 2016, om 14:21 heeft Alex Van

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-08 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Sorry, Bolke. What needs to be done for Google Cloud operators/hooks? If you bring me up-to-speed I can do this. I'm currently working an a CI setup for the Google stuff). On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:56 PM Bolke de Bruin wrote: > I have indeed a branch with cherry picked commits. This branch is >

Re: Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-06 Thread Bolke de Bruin
I have indeed a branch with cherry picked commits. This branch is available in the apache repo. The branch is available as “branch-1.7.2-apache”. What is left to do is to decide weather we do upgrade the google cloud operators/hooks as part of this release as the licenses were only added after t

Airflow Developers Meeting - 08/03 Notes

2016-08-04 Thread Gurer Kiratli
Agenda - Committers sync-up: progress and plans - Max to do a recap since last release - Airbnb - Anyone else? - Cooperation Best Practices - Solicit for feedback for Impersonation Design Review - Release Schedule, Management -