DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21192] - documentation hard to read because of incorrect block-quoting style

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:14 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes > cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that you could > do that for the Class-Path attribute in the main section. It seems > that JDK 1.4.2 now emits w

Re: New Laucher

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That should be fine. The jar is required for ant.jar, since it > provides the AntMain interface. One alternative would be to include AntMain in ant.jar as well. That way ant.jar would not depend upon ant-launcher.jar. Stefan

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can add a warning to the Manifest code, I guess and perhaps even > combine into a single attribute. The later can probably be only optional - I vaguely recall that some J2ME implementations required multiple Class-Path entries and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21211] New: - DELETE Task doesnt delete directorys with included fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: New Laucher

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thoughts? The only thing I've stumbled over for now is the almost duplicate code of Locator#getClassLocationURL and oata.util.LoaderUtils#getClassSource - I'd like to see them merged in some way. Stefan ---

Re: About , , and buffer sizes

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you see a possibility of having: > > > > to be made smart??? If the URLConnection class Java uses for the file: schema supported setIfModifiedSince properly, sure 8-) OK, seriously. We could do by special casing (s

Re: New Laucher

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:02 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Thoughts? > > The only thing I've stumbled over for now is the almost duplicate code > of Locator#getClassLocationURL and > oata.util.LoaderUtils#getClassSource - I'd like to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21228] New: - sql-task: whitespace after jdbc driver name gives a classloader exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21236] New: - javah task doesn't work with j2sdk1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21142] - junit task's classpath doesn't override the existing classpath settings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

Conor MacNeill wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:14 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that you could do that for the Class-Path attribute in the main section. It seems that JDK 1.4.2 n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18007] - stcheckin behavior of rootlocalfolder broken

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

How to get Ant task Id?

According to the Ant book, I have, it indicates that Ant generates an Id for each task that it performs. However, I can't seem to get my hands on this Id. I need it to determine what task has actually finished when there is more than one task with the same name. Any ideas? Thanks. ---

Re: How to get Ant task Id?

You can use the taskName attribute on tasks to set a different name for logging purposes. Use getTaskName() in your listener/logger to access this name. There is no id automatically assigned by Ant, its set via the build file writer if you so choose. Erik On Tuesday, July 1, 2003, at

RE: How to get Ant task Id?

Setting an explicit ID to the task is usually only used to be able to reference that task from a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10499] - Compiler task doesn't handle spaces in filenames correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10499] - Compiler task doesn't handle spaces in filenames correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21144] - Please add make's keep-going feature into ANT.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21236] - javah task doesn't work with j2sdk1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18667] - javah module no longer works with Java 1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21236] - javah task doesn't work with j2sdk1.4.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21144] - Please add make's keep-going feature into ANT.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21245] New: - jar rebuilds when it shouldn't

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21246] New: - move all org.apache.tools.ant.util.* to jakarta commons packages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21249] New: - Add "getXxx()" and "clearXxx()" methods to Javadoc task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21142] - junit task's classpath doesn't override the existing classpath settings

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu