RE: multi-result s

> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Peter's proposition allows to define > the implementation type directly in > types/defaults.properties, then nest these directly > into the element. In this way s > would/could look a lot more like s and > s, especially when ref'd.. > So... does an

multi-result s

Stefan and I talked about doing one of these here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-user&m=107487826503877&w=2 Peter and I each produced a different implementation. See http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26364 for our discussion. In the end Peter's changes are probably more po

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26364] - [PATCH] nested for PLUS composite

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26809] - Ability to set a property for a value in a fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26809] New: - Ability to set a property for a value in a fileset

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Copyright Owner change applied to ANT_16_BRANCH

antoine 2004/02/09 14:12:54 Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH LICENSE docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH LICENSE docs/manual Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH LICENSE antexternal.html base_task_classes.html cover.html credits.html deve

cvs commit: ant/src/etc yearcheck.sh

antoine 2004/02/09 14:16:18 Modified:docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH breadcrumbs.js src/etc Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH yearcheck.sh Log: More copyright owner Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.2.2.2 +1 -1 ant/

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTypes classfileset.html extension.html extensionset.html

antoine 2004/02/09 13:50:10 Modified:docs/manual antexternal.html base_task_classes.html cover.html credits.html develop.html dirtasks.html feedback.html ide.html inputhandler.html install.html intro.html listeners.h

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual LICENSE

antoine 2004/02/09 13:37:26 Modified:.bootstrap.sh docs/manual LICENSE Log: Copyright owner The Apache Software Foundation Revision ChangesPath 1.69 +1 -1 ant/bootstrap.sh Index: bootstrap.sh

cvs commit: ant/proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Property.xml SubAnt.xml

antoine 2004/02/09 13:29:18 Modified:proposal/xdocs build.xml proposal/xdocs/dvsl build.xml task.dvsl proposal/xdocs/dvsl/lib velocity-dvsl-0.42.jar proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Property.xml SubAnt.x

cvs commit : correction of Copyright Owner

antoine 2004/02/09 13:05:47 Modified:src/etc ant-update.xsl changelog.xsl coverage-frames.xsl jdepend-frames.xsl jdepend.xsl junit-frames.xsl junit-noframes.xsl log.xsl maudit-frames.xsl mmetrics-frames.xsl tagdiff.xsl

cvs commit: ant/xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl templates.vm

antoine 2004/02/09 13:11:58 Modified:.LICENSE docs LICENSE proposal/xdocs build.xml proposal/xdocs/dvsl build.xml task.dvsl proposal/xdocs/dvsl/lib velocity-dvsl-0.42.jar proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26570] - duplicate instances of interface com.sun.javadoc.RootDoc loaded

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

can I change junit runner main class

Hi! I've been around having this situation and I need advice on how to make this work in 1.6. I have had to custom patch a couple of classes in 1.5.x to make it work, but now I'd like to see if I can do it without patching. We use JUnit tasks extensively in our instalation, and we have to

Faulty classpath Ant 1.6 Launcher issue

FWIW, I could finally get a hold of a CLASSPATH value that triggers the infamous IllegalArgumentException at sun.net.www.ParseUtil.decode(ParseUtil.java:155) issue with the new Ant 1.6 launcher. Might be linked to how the JMF installer sets up the path, and/or the unexpanded env. var. --DD CLASSPA

Re: Ant 2.0

Steve Loughran wrote: I suppose the problem was that undefined properties were just ignored, and you had a hard time debugging this ( I had similar problems many times ). you can get those messages if you crank up the verbosity, but you still need to go through the lines and look at them. I sup

output redirectors

This topic stems from several discussions (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10741988198&r=1&w=2), mostly springing from the concept, long-and-short, of being able to "map" output from the sourcefile just as is possible with targetfiles. I thought long and hard (well, sort of) and decided t

Re: official name of the ASF

Roy T. Fielding wrote: Please don't take this as a criticism of anyone doing the painful but important work of mass-changing the license, but I've noticed a common mistake: folks are shortening our name. When modifying the copyright notice for Apache software, the name of the copyright owner must b

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs touch.xml

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We should simplify FileUtils.setLastModified (don't think we need to > introspect anything any more, do we ?). Yes. > We should also throw a BuildException if the call to > File.setLastModified returns false. This may be too

Re: Ant 2.0

On Sun, 08 Feb 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing that was voted on (positively, I recall), way way back in > time, was for Ant2.0 to fail on undefined properties. Although I've never looked into it, can't you already have it with a custom PropertyHelper? If you can ens

RE: auto download of antlibs

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 1. Possible requirements > > > > -allow users to specify the URLs of dependent > antlibs > > Why only AntLibs? Maybe resources in general (jars, > AntLets, ...) > There was talk at one point about Ant 2.0 (sorry) possibly incorporating commons-vfs in some way. I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25086] - OutOfMemory error leads to confusing error in XmlLogger

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant XmlLogger.java

peterreilly2004/02/09 05:59:21 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH XmlLogger.java Log: Sync with head Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.39.2.3 +2 -0 ant/src/main/org/a

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant XmlLogger.java

peterreilly2004/02/09 05:58:02 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant XmlLogger.java Log: XmlLogger: Remove tasks and targets from the hashtables when the task/target finished event arrives. PR: 25086 (a patch provided in one of the comments) Obtained from: Artur Lorincz

RE: new external task (snip)

done Jan > -Original Message- > From: Marty Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: new external task (snip) > > > The following is a patch to the external.xml list of tasks. > Please let me know if there is a more appr

Re: auto download of antlibs

Costin Manolache wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: OK, now that Ant1.6 has antlibs, it is time to think of the next step: auto download of antlibs and (perhaps) dependencies. 1. Possible requirements -allow users to specify the URLs of dependent antlibs -allow teams to provide an override point that s

cvs commit: ant/docs external.html

jhm 2004/02/09 02:51:41 Modified:xdocsTag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.xml docs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH external.html Log: Sync with HEAD new Task: snip Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.100.2.7 +29 -0

cvs commit: ant/docs external.html

jhm 2004/02/09 02:47:41 Modified:xdocsexternal.xml docs external.html Log: New Task: snip Revision ChangesPath 1.116 +29 -0 ant/xdocs/external.xml Index: external.xml ===

Re: Ant 2.0

Costin Manolache wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: I know Ant2.0-the-rewrite is essentially dead (and essentially obsolete through evolution in the codebase), but I still think we ought to consider using the name as and when the time is appropriate. If we add enough interesting stuff to 1.7, it could

RE: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed

Fine, no open (reported) gump failure :-) Jan > -Original Message- > From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:54 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ant/test-ant failed > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Haven

Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Haven´t found any error. http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/ant/work/build_ant_test-ant.html Start Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:58:45 (CET) End Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:05:27 (CET) BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 6 minutes 37 seconds Maybe mail is from an older run ... Jan

RE: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed

Haven´t found any error. http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/ant/work/build_ant_test-ant.html Start Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:58:45 (CET) End Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:05:27 (CET) BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 6 minutes 37 seconds Maybe mail is from an older run ... Jan > -Original Me

RE: auto download of antlibs

> OK, now that Ant1.6 has antlibs, it is time to think of the > next step: > auto download of antlibs and (perhaps) dependencies. > > 1. Possible requirements > > -allow users to specify the URLs of dependent antlibs Why only AntLibs? Maybe resources in general (jars, AntLets, ...) > -allow

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25086] - OutOfMemory error leads to confusing error in XmlLogger

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: auto download of antlibs

Steve Loughran wrote: OK, now that Ant1.6 has antlibs, it is time to think of the next step: auto download of antlibs and (perhaps) dependencies. 1. Possible requirements -allow users to specify the URLs of dependent antlibs -allow teams to provide an override point that specifies their location

Re: Ant 2.0

Steve Loughran wrote: I know Ant2.0-the-rewrite is essentially dead (and essentially obsolete through evolution in the codebase), but I still think we ought to consider using the name as and when the time is appropriate. If we add enough interesting stuff to 1.7, it could be the time. Please, no