This probably isn't going to be as easy as you hope - for instance
POMs often rely on property interpolation and inheritence of other
files.
Is there any reason not to use org.apache.maven.MavenUtils?
- Brett
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:45:24 -0400, Kyle Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Porter
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29930.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29930.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30459.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30706.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30706.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant tasks/types.
Currently, Ant gives access to enumerations of names for attributes
and nested elements for a given type thru IntrospectionHelper, and
once one has a name, the Java Class for that attribute/nested-element,
but on the other hand
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30710.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dominique,
Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
generation was done? How much of what you're doing is reinventing what
was done there? Sounds almost identical. I leveraged
IntrospectionHelper as well as the XDoclet object model to get all the
info I needed.
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant
tasks/types.
Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
generation was done? How much of what you're doing
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30712.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29811.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Aug 17, 2004, at 11:51 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant
tasks/types.
Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation
Thanks,
I see the problem. You were correct in the analysis, it is the
same problem that the xdoclet task has. The same task object
gets used twice and the objects created/modified during the execute
call are not reset for the second call of execute. (a design that is asking
for bugs to happen!).
peterreilly2004/08/17 11:13:50
Modified:.WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs MacroInstance.java
Log:
fix for multiple macro instance use to fail
Revision ChangesPath
1.647 +4 -1 ant/WHATSNEW
Index: WHATSNEW
peterreilly2004/08/17 11:20:04
Modified:.Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH WHATSNEW
src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Tag: ANT_16_BRANCH
MacroInstance.java
Log:
sync with HEAD
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
Dominique Devienne wrote:
But reinventing the wheel or not, the fact remains that the additional
accessors I'm requesting in IntrospectionHelper are needed for any
solution that doesn't want to re-code the attribute/nested-element logic
in reverse, or the whole logic of the add[Configured](Class)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30716.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ii am sorry, the target is to be read as below
target name=wsdeploy depends=makewar
exec executable=C:\jwsdp-1.4\jaxrpc\bin\wsdeploy.bat
arg line=-classpath quot;c:\j2sdkee1.4
\lib\j2ee.jar;c:\mvc_facsrchwslib\MVC_FACSRCHWS.jarquot;
arg line=-tmpdir c:\mvc_facsrchws\assemble /
arg
22 matches
Mail list logo
