DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are adding getInputStream to Resource. However,
without changing the FileSelector interface (bad),
more than bad.
its ability to interact with Resources is limited. We could
possibly create a new ResourceSelector interface.
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26632.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello Steve,
It's certainly true that the jarsigner tool has not kept pace with recent PKI
developments in the J2SE platform. For example, J2SE 1.4 introduced an API for
cert path validation and J2SE 1.5 introduced support for cert revocation
checking using OCSP and enhancements to the existing
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are adding getInputStream to Resource.
However,
without changing the FileSelector interface (bad),
more than bad.
its ability to interact with Resources is limited.
We could
From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
3) I'd rather not hard-code selector types.
what other options exist? A built-in Antlib for
namespacing the ResourceSelector types? A
DynamicElement ResourceSelectorContainer?
Yeah, I'm surprised we don't have these built-in AntLibs already for
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Ant Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by MatthewSherian:
http://wiki.apache.org/ant/AntNewbies
--
'''Answer
I also like the idea of using antlibs, but do we then
indicate that the user must explicitly set up the
namespace prefixes or do we assign them automagically?
If the former, will anybody use them? If the latter,
what prefixes to use?
-Matt
--- Dominique Devienne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
I also like the idea of using antlibs, but do we then
indicate that the user must explicitly set up the
namespace prefixes or do we assign them automagically?
If the former, will anybody use them? If the latter,
what prefixes to use?
The user must explicitly set them up.
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Benson wrote:
I also like the idea of using antlibs, but do we then
indicate that the user must explicitly set up the
namespace prefixes or do we assign them automagically?
If the former, will anybody use them? If the latter,
what prefixes
mbenson 2005/04/01 11:15:34
Modified:xdocscontributors.xml
docs contributors.html
Log:
DD is opinionated!
Revision ChangesPath
1.38 +1 -1 ant/xdocs/contributors.xml
Index: contributors.xml
--- Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
I also like the idea of using antlibs, but do we
then
indicate that the user must explicitly set up the
namespace prefixes or do we assign them
automagically?
The user must
Matt Benson wrote:
what other things could we do to increase
ease-of-setup for antlibs?
Not use xml namespaces ;-)
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
what other things could we do to increase
ease-of-setup for antlibs?
Not use xml namespaces ;-)
Jokes apart, is that possible or desirable?
Are you having second thoughts about their use Peter?
I'm using them extensively, and like them, maybe
What's difficult already?
It's like a Java import basically.
You declare what you're using. What's wrong with
that? --DD
hmm... using the project attributes:
project name=foo default=bar
xmlns:fs=antlib:org.apache.tools.ant.types.selectors
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
19 matches
Mail list logo