Matt Benson wrote:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[SNIP]
Apart from the variands A and B further below, would
the following also
work?
project name=foo default=bar
resourcecollection id=blah xmlns=ant:set
and
files dir=foo name=**/*.java/
date select=newer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34461.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll use your example below to ask what will be
(im)possible
The question is not whether the resourcecollection
themselve need a
namespace, but if it would be allowed to address
elements from the same
namespace, so that the default namespace
