Re: svn commit: r396462 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java

Stefan Bodewig schreef: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Careful about these Martijn. I could be wrong, but I think these "new in 1.7" methods could be backports from ZipFileSet, which would actually make them older and newly deprecated. They are, either Z

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36897] - cloak and decloack function in vss

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin Jackson wrote: Anybody have a problem with splitting VSS off into an antlib so that people with VSS can easily add tasks etc? Sounds right. For Ant 1.7 we could have a download that b

Re: svn commit: r396462 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Careful about these Martijn. I could be wrong, but I > think these "new in 1.7" methods could be backports > from ZipFileSet, which would actually make them older > and newly deprecated. They are, either ZipFileSet or TarFileSet, can'

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated methods since ant 1.4.x. or earlier.

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Do you agree the methods marked as deprecated in ant 1.4.x or > earlier to be removed? > > The following methods have been marked deprecated in ant 1.4.x or > earlier: > > Project.addFilter(String token, String value) >

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated classes since ant 1.2.x or earlier

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following classes have already been deprecated since ant 1.2.x: > > Copydir > Copyfile > Deltree is still faster than delete in some cases. > Exec > Jikes > JikesOutputParser > KeySubst > Rename is still a better choice tha

Re: Marking deprecated with since tags

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have started marking every @deprecated in our code with since > tags. > > Is this seen as useful. Yes. > And how do you look at the proposal to drop the deprecated since > 1.4.x in 1.7? No. As Gump shows us there a tons of o

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kevin Jackson wrote: >>Anybody have a problem with splitting VSS off into an antlib so that >>people with VSS can easily add tasks etc? Sounds right. For Ant 1.7 we could have a download that bundles Ant 1.7 and the latest released ve

Re: Adding a methof to StringUtils

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > still not that accurate as it doesnt represent real builds. Better > to turn off logging for a day and see how much faster gump gets... You probably wouldn't see much of an effect there either since Gump spends most of its time wai

svn commit: r396766 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant: helper/ProjectHelperImpl.java taskdefs/optional/ssh/ScpToMessage.java types/resources/ArchiveResource.java types/resources/Compr

Author: bodewig Date: Mon Apr 24 21:06:25 2006 New Revision: 396766 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396766&view=rev Log: 2006 Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper/ProjectHelperImpl.java ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/ssh/Scp

Re: Ant 1.7 beta?

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Kev Jackson wrote: Hi, Checked the planning wiki this morning and noticed that the release schedule for the first beta of 1.7 is set at May/June this year. Since this is rapidly approaching, what are the thoughts on a: timing, each release requires a vote.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39373] - scp task does not work for some sshd, which does not scp1 protocol.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated classes since ant 1.2.x or earlier

On 4/22/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Do you agree the classes marked as deprecated in ant 1.2.x or earlier to > be removed? > > The following classes have already been deprecated since ant 1.2.x: > > Copydir > Copyfile > Deltree > Exec > Jikes > JikesOutputParser > K

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated methods since ant 1.4.x. or earlier.

On 4/22/06, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Do you agree the methods marked as deprecated in ant 1.4.x or earlier to > be removed? > > The following methods have been marked deprecated in ant 1.4.x or earlier: > > Project.addFilter(String token, String value) > Project.getFi

Re: Spring cleanup ?

my +1 Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39373] - scp task does not work for some sshd, which does not scp1 protocol.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39373] - scp task does not work for some sshd, which does not scp1 protocol.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Resources & Introspection

> My dream : > > No! It was my dream first and you can't have it! :) I agree wholeheartedly. IIRC myself, Stefan, and probably others took part in a discussion of this nature some time ago... though I'm too frustrated by my slow home internet connection to find the thread ATM. Maybe we can ge

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39063] - Another fork="true" bug (hanging process)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39063] - Another fork="true" bug (hanging process)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39063] - Another fork="true" bug (hanging process)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39373] - scp task does not work for some sshd, which does not scp1 protocol.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r396462 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java

Careful about these Martijn. I could be wrong, but I think these "new in 1.7" methods could be backports from ZipFileSet, which would actually make them older and newly deprecated. br, Matt --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: jkf > Date: Mon Apr 24 00:02:35 2006 > New Revision: 396462 > > U

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated classes since ant 1.2.x or earlier

--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Do you agree the classes marked as deprecated in ant > 1.2.x or earlier to > be removed? > > The following classes have already been deprecated > since ant 1.2.x: > > Copydir > Copyfile > Deltree > Exec > Jikes > JikesOutputParser >

Re: [Vote] Removal of deprecated methods since ant 1.4.x. or earlier.

--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > Do you agree the methods marked as deprecated in ant > 1.4.x or earlier to > be removed? > > The following methods have been marked deprecated in > ant 1.4.x or earlier: > > Project.addFilter(String token, String value) > Project.getF

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

--- Kevin Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody have a problem with splitting VSS off into > an antlib so that > people with VSS can easily add tasks etc? I recall Registering my support for breaking as much 3pp stuff away from core. -Matt > that there are > also a couple of bugs listed

Re: Spring cleanup ?

I am in favor of this also. -Matt --- Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > As I just resubscribed and noticed there is > apparently spring cleanup > going on in the code, I think it would be worth to > get rid of: > - JProbe Coverage task > - Metamata Audit task > - Metam

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Spring cleanup ?

+1 Peter On 4/24/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Stephane, > > this sounds like a good idea. > > Regards, > > Antoine > > Stephane Bailliez wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup > > going on in the code, I th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r396563 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Launcher.java src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Apr 24 07:15:52 2006 New Revision: 396563 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396563&view=rev Log: Bugzilla Report: 39295 Reporter: Waldek Herka extract the fileToURL code use it for tools jar as well as the other paths Modified: ant/core/trunk/CONTRIBUTORS

Re: Spring cleanup ?

Hello Stephane, this sounds like a good idea. Regards, Antoine Stephane Bailliez wrote: Hi all, As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of: - JProbe Coverage task - Metamata Audit task - Metamata Metri

Spring cleanup ?

Hi all, As I just resubscribed and noticed there is apparently spring cleanup going on in the code, I think it would be worth to get rid of: - JProbe Coverage task - Metamata Audit task - Metamata Metrics task JProbe should not be working anymore since JProbe 4 As for Metamata, I doubt anyone

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant 1.7 beta?

Kev Jackson wrote: > Hi, > > Checked the planning wiki this morning and noticed that the release > schedule for the first beta of 1.7 is set at May/June this year. > > Since this is rapidly approaching, what are the thoughts on > a: timing, each release requires a vote. A vote is open one week. but

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

Kev Jackson wrote: Yes thats another problem, the tests are bound to a configuration of VSS +DB that will not be available to gump, so I could build a whole set of tests for all the functionality we currently provide, then they would be next to useless for someone else without first configur

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

Steve Loughran wrote: Kev Jackson wrote: Kevin Jackson wrote: Standard Ant contains a number of VSS tasks and I'm writing a couple more for my own use (tasks relating to file / project properties, such as shared versions). My questions are: should I submit these tasks for possible inclusion

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

Kev Jackson wrote: Kevin Jackson wrote: Standard Ant contains a number of VSS tasks and I'm writing a couple more for my own use (tasks relating to file / project properties, such as shared versions). My questions are: should I submit these tasks for possible inclusion in the standard Ant distr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39295] - white spaces in path

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39063] - Another fork="true" bug (hanging process)

"rm $ANT_HOME/lib/ant-*.jar" is a bit extreme The script I use is """ unset ANT_HOME rm -rf build bootstrap ./build.sh test -Dtest.haltonfailure=false """ As Antoine pointed out, the most difficult part is to find the external jars for the optional tasks (and modify some of them). These are of cour

Re: Additional SourceSafe (VSS) Tasks - Any Comments?

Kevin Jackson wrote: Standard Ant contains a number of VSS tasks and I'm writing a couple more for my own use (tasks relating to file / project properties, such as shared versions). My questions are: should I submit these tasks for possible inclusion in the standard Ant distribution? And if so,

svn commit: r396465 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java

Author: jkf Date: Mon Apr 24 00:10:54 2006 New Revision: 396465 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396465&view=rev Log: Whitespace / contants / javadoc Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/

svn commit: r396460 - in /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant: helper/ProjectHelperImpl.java taskdefs/optional/NetRexxC.java

Author: jkf Date: Sun Apr 23 23:59:42 2006 New Revision: 396460 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396460&view=rev Log: Remove use of deprecated methods Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/helper/ProjectHelperImpl.java ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/ta

svn commit: r396462 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java

Author: jkf Date: Mon Apr 24 00:02:35 2006 New Revision: 396462 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396462&view=rev Log: Remove of new in ant 1.7 and deprecated in ant 1.7 methods. Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/ArchiveFileSet.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/sr