AW: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

2009-12-11 Thread Jan.Materne
A little warning seems to be good. "This is the last release for Eclipse 3.3. With the next version Eclipse 3.4 or newer is required." This "3.3-Release" without the visualizer - and maybe this year? Then after finishing the visualizer a release of the new version? On the other hand: current ver

Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets [again]

2009-12-11 Thread Xavier Hanin
2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig > On 2009-12-09, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > [...] > > > > Now thinking loud, maybe a simple attribute on target like > > dependencies="public" would also fit ? > > Likely coupled with changing the current target-group name. > > Only thinking loudly as well we could turn

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

2009-12-11 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 06:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows > build files to be written in Groovy. It can be found attached to > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347 > > It would start life at Ant insid

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

2009-12-11 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
+1 Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows build files to be written in Groovy. It can be found attached to https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347 It would start life at Ant inside the sandbox. Since this is

Re: IVYDE - Proposal to increase minimum supported Eclipse version to 3.4

2009-12-11 Thread Jon Schneider
> A little warning seems to be good. "This is the last release for Eclipse 3.3. With the next version Eclipse 3.4 or newer is required." > This "3.3-Release" without the visualizer - and maybe this year? > Then after finishing the visualizer a release of the new version? I'd be happy to put tog

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

2009-12-11 Thread Jon Schneider
I think that there is value in this product. Unbinding +1 from me. Jon

AW: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

2009-12-11 Thread Jan.Materne
+1 Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] >Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 06:12 >An: dev@ant.apache.org >Betreff: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation > >Hi, > >Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows >build files

Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets [again]

2009-12-11 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Xavier Hanin wrote: > 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig >> and would do away with any notion of target composition people way >> expect from the name target-*group*. > I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that doesn't > provide any composition. [.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy-Front Donation

2009-12-11 Thread Bruce Atherton
+1. Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Nicolas wants to donate his ProjectHelper implementation that allows build files to be written in Groovy. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets [again]

2009-12-11 Thread Bruce Atherton
Xavier Hanin wrote: 2009/12/10 Stefan Bodewig and would do away with any notion of target composition people way expect from the name target-*group*. I also think the name target-group is confusing for something that doesn't provide any composition. Still I'm not sure dependencies=