Re: [VOTE] migration to git

2014-04-29 Thread Maarten Coene
Probably because I don't know much about git, but I don't see the real advantage of the switch from SVN to git. In addition, I don't have the time to help adapting the Ivy release process/scripts. But I don't want to stand in the way if everyone thinks this should be done. So, my vote is: for I

AW: svn commit: r1591187 - in /ant/core/trunk: build.xml release.sh

2014-04-29 Thread jhm
Like that? https://builds.apache.org/job/Ant_BuildFromPOMs/ - JDK 1.5 - ubuntu - @hourly - Maven 3.0.5 -- src/etc/poms/pom.xml -- clean package -DskipTests Jan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Antoine Levy Lambert [mailto:anto...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. April 2014 06:15 > An:

Re: svn commit: r1591187 - in /ant/core/trunk: build.xml release.sh

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi, in order to avoid finding issues with ant’s pom files after the fact, I have added a step of building ant using maven in our release script. This is just to check that the compilation and building of jars work using maven, the target folder gets deleted in the next line. and also created a T

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.4 (second attempt)

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi all, restarting the vote thread after having fixed the pom of ant-testutil and rebuilt a release with many bug fixes and improvements, including the initial support for Java 1.9, the possibility to run JUnit tests in multiple threads (when they are forked) and the refactoring of Ant's own te

Re: [VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.4

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Canceling this vote thread, I have just found a bug, the pom.xml of ant-testutil references still JUnit 3.8 and not JUnit 4.11 I will make another build with this error fixed. Antoine On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > Hi all, > > a release with many bug fixes and i

[VOTE] Release Ant 1.9.4

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi all, a release with many bug fixes and improvements, including the initial support for Java 1.9, the possibility to run JUnit tests in multiple threads (when they are forked) and the refactoring of Ant's own test suite which is now based on JUnit 4. I propose to adopt the following as Ant 1.9

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Matt Sicker
You can use git submodules similarly. I just don't think it stays automatically up to date with the HEAD of a branch. If you want that, I believe you need to use a 3rd party plugin. On 29 April 2014 10:10, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote: > Then this could be an issue with while migrating to git for Iv

Re: How to submit a change for AntUnit?

2014-04-29 Thread chris . holman
Much appreciated Stefan. It's a great tool; I wrote an ant script recently to auto build and deploy oracle databases from an SVN repository. It was a monster of a script and the AntUnit scripts I wrote for it were indispensable! Regards, Chris Holman http://uk.linkedin.com/in/chrisdholman/

Re: How to submit a change for AntUnit?

2014-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-04-29, wrote: > Hi Stephan: nod of appreciation for AntUnit :-), Oh, many people have contributed. > Is the code base quiet because there are no further changes required, > or is there an alternative that I should use instead? Probably because it does what is needed by Ant itself and t

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
Then this could be an issue with while migrating to git for Ivy / EasyAnt as they both use xooki to create website and project documentation (website contains version of each releassed documentation through svn:external). I thought gitpubsub could be used for website. 2014-04-29 5:00 GMT+02:00 A

Re: How to submit a change for AntUnit?

2014-04-29 Thread chris . holman
Hi Stephan: nod of appreciation for AntUnit :-), Is the code base quiet because there are no further changes required, or is there an alternative that I should use instead? Being able to dump the logs is very handy when debugging the tests/build scripts :-) If the LogCapturer was only int

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Matt Sicker
It's good to use a separate git repository (or svn repository or whatever works best for you) for storing large assets. You can use it as a git submodule to pull in a specific revision ID (so it's somewhat similar to svn:external, except you have to update it yourself and commit changes to the poin

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: >> Just for info, what makes you say that? Why would git be worse than >> SVN for large files? > > Below see some references found in google, the first one says that each > vers

Re: How to submit a change for AntUnit?

2014-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-04-29, wrote: > Good point on the rationale behind this functionality. Not sure what > reason there could be to have the log reported as a single line. > Though I can imagine existing scripts working round it by inserting > EOL characters at the end of an echo statement. It's been years

Re: How to submit a change for AntUnit?

2014-04-29 Thread chris . holman
Thanks, Good point on the rationale behind this functionality. Not sure what reason there could be to have the log reported as a single line. Though I can imagine existing scripts working round it by inserting EOL characters at the end of an echo statement. I've come across others that ha

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello Dominique, On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: >> git is not the tool of choice to deal with large files such as the ones on >> dist.apache.org. >> That might be part of the reason why infra supports only

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the only supported mechanism to maintain

Re: migration to git and web site publication

2014-04-29 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: > On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: >>> The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the >>> only supported mechanism to maintain web sites AFAIK. >> [...] git/gitpubsub is working? > > Apache