Hi,
I am building Ant from source for the first time, using the SVN tree, at
revision 1517854.
When I try to build the project I get the following error:
compile-tests:
[javac] Compiling 9 source files to
/Users/ajmas/Development/third-party/ant/ant-core/build/testcases
[javac]
/Users
issue.
Andre
On 28-Aug-2013, at 00:05, Andre-John Mas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building Ant from source for the first time, using the SVN tree, at
> revision 1517854.
>
> When I try to build the project I get the following error:
>
> compile-tests:
>[javac] Compiling 9
Hi,
I have created a patch for 'Bug 55489'
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55489),
which allows specifying of the user agent in the 'get' task and also changes
the code to specify
a new default value.
This was created based on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1435 .
I would vote for supporting Java 6 and then indicating on the website which ant
+ ivy/ivyDE version combination is needed to support pre-JDK 1.6 environments,
especially given the argument about Ant requiring more recent JDK version.
JDK 1.6 has been out long enough that it should probably be c
Hi,
As part of my work on issue 55489, "Allow specifying of alternative user
agent for the 'get' task", I need to be able to include the Ant version
string in the user-agent (Apache Ant/0.0), but using the following:
getProject().getProperty(MagicNames.ANT_VERSION)
or
Main.getVersion()
both r
Hi,
I recently made a code contribution and had the task get the version from the
Main class. I appreciate this probably want the best approach and I am trying
to consider options going forward. I had looked at the ant.version property,
but the is only available in the project scope and also li
lity with the version? I.e., this task will
> work on versions >= n? A commonly taken approach there is to use the
> presence of some particular class introduced in the target version, rather
> than fiddling with version numbers per se.
>
> HTH,
> Matt
>
>
> On Mon,
gt; Looks like Main.getAntVersion() is your friend.
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Andre-John Mas wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This was the Get Task, whereby I was getting the ant version for use in
>> the user-agent response. I am using the value un
Covered in this ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55489
On 9-Dec-2013, at 17:00, Matt Benson wrote:
> Do you have a link to that discussion? I'd be interested to catch up the
> context here.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 20
On 2013-12-10, at 0:18, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-12-09, Andre-John Mas wrote:
>
>> It is what I used and how the patch was accepted, but since I was told
>> it wasn't ideal I wanted to see if there were ways to deal with this
>> going forward.
>
>
On 2013-12-23, at 1:01, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-12-23, wrote:
>
>> Do we want to distribute the installer systematically with new
>> versions of Ant ?
>
> I wouldn't mind much if it can be created outside of a Mac. Then again
> we don't ship Windows installers, Debian packages, RPMs .
Hi,
I think this may be the simplest approach, since invariably most people using
Ant will probably interact with the command line at some point?
Andre
Sent from my tablet
On 2013-12-23, at 11:05, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
>
> Le 23 déc. 2013 à 13:47, Antoine Levy Lambert a écrit :
>
>> Hell
Could we conceive of having a GitHub project, that serves as a point for
pull-requests and other community work and at the same time have a git repo at
Apache that syncs with this?
André-John
Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
> On 30 Apr 2014, at 17:33, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
t;
> In any case, I applaud the effort to migrate to get and understand the
> concerns. My experience has been truly great moving to git.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Andre-John Mas
> wrote:
>
>> Could we conceive of having a GitHub project, that serves a
Hi,
Would it not be better simply to specify UTF-8 for all generated HTML
documents, rather than relying on platform defaults?
André-John
Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
> On 14 May 2014, at 22:29, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>
> Hello Stefan,
>
> I have had the same prob
Can we not work with pull requests, in Git? At least this is an approach when
working in GitHub.
André-John
Sent from my phone. Envoyé depuis mon téléphone.
> On 6 Jun 2014, at 12:19, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
>
> I do not think each commiter needs to do that but if you and Jean-Louis go
Consider Enterprise is often 2 versions (maybe 3 versions) behind latest JDK,
at lease based on my own experience, so 7 should still be included?
Sent from my tablet
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 10:31, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I think it's time to drop support f
I think that should be fine.
Thanks
Sent from my tablet
> On Mar 26, 2016, at 06:16, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-25, André-John Mas wrote:
>>
>> Missed this. Must admit I had forgotten it was there and it hadn't
>> occurred to me to check there. At the same time was thinking someth
18 matches
Mail list logo
