[RESULT] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC2

kiran Pai: +1 -Jaikiran On 25/08/24 8:49 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2     on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     sv

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC2

+1 -Jaikiran On 25/08/24 8:49 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2     on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     svn revision:

Issues noticed in RC1 of 1.10.15 have been addressed (was: [VOTE] ...)

schreef Stefan Bodewig: On 2024-08-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than 21st August 2024 14:30 UTC. +1 compared tag and source tarball, checked hashes and signatures. Things look good to me.

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC2

Hello everyone, I've created RC2 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC2     on commit: 92fe5ca29625d30b98704806d6379fe9acb001e3 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     svn revision: 71094 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: [CANCELLED] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC1

a lot! Martijn Op 19/08/2024 om 16:53 schreef Stefan Bodewig: On 2024-08-18, Jaikiran Pai wrote: This is a vote email and the voting will be open for at least 72 hours and close no earlier than 21st August 2024 14:30 UTC. +1 compared tag and source tarball, checked hashes and signatures. Things

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file - verified the checksum - Checked manual docs for some of the tasks - Built some projects using Java 8 and Java 22 and this released version of Ant. -Jaikiran On 18/08/24 7:46 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've cr

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.15 based on RC1

Hello everyone, I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.15 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.15_RC1     on commit: 2250895d174f5beee54e9e4ea9523500feb1f1f9 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     svn revision: 70964 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: Release Ant 1.10.15?

lan a new release? I am asking especially because of https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68773 because I would like to use a released ant version in production and not a nightly build :) Thank you very much Florian On 2024/02/23 10:24:21 Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2024-02-21, Jaikira

Re: JDK 23 RDP2 | Removal of the legacy COMPAT locale provider and more heads-up!

Hello David, I ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 23 build 23-ea+33-2358. The tests ran fine and no related issues were noticed https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/51/ -Jaikiran On 22/07/24 10:55 am, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the OpenJ

Re: [RESULT] EOL Apache Ant 1.9.x release series

In the coming days, I'll update relevant pages of our website to note this decision. -Jaikiran On 19/06/24 2:56 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, With binding +1s from Ant PMC members: Dominique Devienne Nicolas Lalevée Martijn Kruithof Maarten Coene Jaikiran Pai and a non-bindi

[RESULT] EOL Apache Ant 1.9.x release series

Hello everyone, With binding +1s from Ant PMC members: Dominique Devienne Nicolas Lalevée Martijn Kruithof Maarten Coene Jaikiran Pai and a non-binding +1 from Roger Whitcomb and no other votes, it is decided that Apache Ant 1.9.x series is now EOLed. There won't be any more Ant

Re: [VOTE] EOL Apache Ant 1.9.x release series

Implicit +1 from me. -Jaikiran On 16/06/24 11:40 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, 4 years back in 2020, we initiated an vote to EOL 1.9.x release versions of Apache Ant. We didn't receive enough votes at that time to formalize it (which is OK). The last release of Ant 1.9.x re

Re: JDK 23 Feature Freeze / New Loom EA builds

Hello David, I ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 23 EA build 23-ea+26-2269 and no related issues were noticed https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/50/ -Jaikiran On 10/06/24 12:58 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality

Re: Ant jenkins jobs

The Apache infra team have addressed this issue and I am now able to trigger the job runs. -Jaikiran On 12/06/24 10:55 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: It looks like something has changed with our Jenkins instance and I can no longer trigger Ant jobs - I don't see the "Build/Build with

Ant jenkins jobs

It looks like something has changed with our Jenkins instance and I can no longer trigger Ant jobs - I don't see the "Build/Build with Parameters" link or any such link which allows you to trigger the job, even after I am successfully logged in. Could one of you who previously used to trigger

Re: Java 22 is GA + Heads-up!

Hello David, I ran our Ant testsuite against Java 22 build 22+36-2370 and Java 23 EA build 23-ea+17-1368. The tests completed fine and no regressions or issues were found: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/48/ https://ci-builds.apache.org/job

Release Ant 1.10.15?

Hello everyone, It's been around 6 months since our last Ant 1.10.x release. We have some reasonable amount of changes and bug fixes done since then https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WHATSNEW#L1. If it's OK then I plan to do the next 1.10.x release in a few weeks, unless someone is w

Re: [VOTE] Retire the IvyDE Subproject

+1 for retiring IvyDE. -Jaikiran On 23/11/23 12:49 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I'm really sorry and embarrassed but I seem to have misunderstood the purpose of the Attic, it is not responsible for retiring subprojects, only for top level projects like Ant as a whole with all subprojects. The cor

Re: [VOTE] Send IvyDE to the Apache Attic

On 19/11/23 11:09 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: ... So here is the formal vote: I hereby propose to create a board resolution that will send IvyDE to the Apache Attic. +1 -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@a

Re: JDK 21 Is Now GA, a New VS Code Extension, and an Annotation Processing Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 21 (build 21.0.1+12-29) and the tests all ran fine https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/41/. > Needless to say, that Java 21 is an important release, so may I ask you to send me a brief email wit

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.14 released

de in ant.bat that does an initial execution of java.exe to check specification level regarding the setting of java.security.manager? I see the bourne shell script has no equivalent code. --ewh On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, 12:51 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the relea

Re: Need help with release versions in bugzilla

Thank you Stefan. I probably didn't look correctly when trying to close a recent bug that got fixed. I see that the bug is now correctly fixed for 1.10.15. Thank you. -Jaikiran On 08/09/23 12:13 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-09-08, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Can someone with admin permis

Need help with release versions in bugzilla

Can someone with admin permissions please mark 1.10.14 as a released version in Ant bugzilla and create a new 1.10.15 release in it? I forgot to ask for help when I released 1.10.14. -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: Future of Ivy and IvyDE

I agree with what Stefan notes in his mail. Some years back when I started contributing to Ivy, I realized that the documentation (formal or informal) related to the internal implementation details of Ivy is non-existent. Sometimes I had to select a file, go over its commit history then go read

[RESULT] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

With (binding) +1s for Stefan, Maarten, me and Paul (non-binding), this vote has now passed. I'll now go ahead with the rest of the release process. Thank you all for the help in moving this release forward. -Jaikiran On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've c

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC2

+1 Downloaded the RC2 of 2.5.2 and built some projects, checked some manuals and docs and the checksum. -Jaikiran On 17/08/23 10:22 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've cancelled the previous vote as the NOTICE file didn't contain 2023. sorry about this. Now I've built a new release candid

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the newer version and checked the NOTICE file - verified the checksum - Built some projects using this newer version, on Java 8, 17 and 20 - Checked manual docs for some of the tasks -Jaikiran On 16/08/23 6:05 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello everyone, I've create

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC1

On 17/08/23 10:02 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: I have not built the update site because I couldn't get the build process to work, so if anybody with the proper build environment wants to create one, thank you. I'm sure we can create it after the release if we want to. Is this the Eclipse update

Re: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.5.2 Based on RC1

Hello Stefan, +1. The NOTICE file however will need an update to the year (it's currently having 2022). - Downloaded from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/ivy/2.5.2/ - Verified the checksum - Checked the NOTICE file (needs an update to the year) - Checked some random manuals - Ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

yes. Gary ____ From: Jaikiran Pai Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:35:22 AM To: u...@ant.apache.org ; dev@ant.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1 EXTERNAL EMAIL Hello everyone, I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release: git tag:

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.14 based on RC1

Hello everyone, I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.14 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.14_RC1     on commit: 53f19eccf49acf526415997046dca5a5135b0e8f tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     revision: 63474 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repos

Re: Release Ivy 2.5.2

Sounds good to me. -Jaikiran On 13/08/23 4:45 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all while Jaikiran talks about release Ant, I intend to cut a new Ivy release soonish. We've seen two bug fixes to Ivy and I believe IVY-1642 shows a seri

Release Ant 1.10.14?

We have a decent amount of fixes and changes since we released Ant 1.10.13 https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/master/WHATSNEW. Plus, Ant 1.10.13 broke some setups due to our changes to SecurityManager related usage. I recently reverted those SecurityManager related changes and have now pushed s

Re: JDK 22 is in Rampdown Phase 2 | Annotation Processing Change Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 21 EA build 21-ea+34-2500 and the tests ran fine https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/37/. The 22 EA build 22-ea+9-633 tests too ran fine https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Li

Re: How to use custom .ivy2 directory

Hello Yuri, There's a section in https://ant.apache.org/ivy/history/2.5.1/tutorial/defaultconf.html called "Setting up the repositories" which explains the use of the ivy.default.ivy.user.dir property which controls this location. -Jaikiran On 07/08/23 1:42 pm, Yuri wrote: One project (lig

Re: JDK 21 EA builds 22 & Sequenced Collections Heads-up

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 21 EA build 21-ea+22-1890 and all tests went fine without any failures https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/35/ -Jaikiran On 15/05/23 8:08 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the latest OpenJ

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Paul, On 12/12/22 5:30 am, Paul King wrote: Do you know if there is an issue with the "allow" class approach if multiple projects adopt that technique? E.g. if Netbeans or Groovy also have an allow class, will that cause a split package violation or since it isn't really referenced except

Re: Issues running tests on Gump after switching to Java 21

Hello Stefan, I had a brief look. Do you happen to know how these builds are launched in Gump? I have never used gump before, so I'm not familiar with it. Most of these failures in Ant build seem to be happening due to: [java] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The Security Manager is

Re: JDK 20 Release Candidate and Deprecation

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite against Java 20 build 20+36-2344 and Java 21 EA build 21-ea+11-905. No regressions were found: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/33/ https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%2

Re: Need help with Ant versions in bugzilla

Thank you Stefan. I didn't check before sending this mail :) -Jaikiran On 10/01/23 7:16 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-10, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.

Need help with Ant versions in bugzilla

Now that we have released 1.10.13 of Ant, could someone with bugzilla access please create a new 1.10.13 product version and a new 1.10.14 milestone version, for Ant? -Jaikiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.ap

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.13 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.13. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires Ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

it to rel/1.10.12 Martijn Op 09/01/2023 om 02:30 schreef Jaikiran Pai: +1 Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine -Jaikiran On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

+1 Tried the new version to build some existing projects - worked fine Checked NOTICE file and some random manual docs - looks fine -Jaikiran On 06/01/23 4:57 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2023-01-04, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Happy new year, everyone :) to you as well I've created RC1 re

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.13 based on RC1

Happy new year, everyone :) I've created RC1 release candidate for Ant 1.10.13 release: git tag: ANT_1.10.13_RC1     on commit: 6996b80b5fb59cc2769f7098d837de32680a tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/     revision: 59117 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/c

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 26/11/22 11:33 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-19, Stefan Bodewig wrote: while running all tests locally I realized https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/194 introduces a bug when tars have an encoding set. You can see this with UntarTest failing. A multibyte encoding like U

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 18/11/22 2:40 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Users can still use the current released Ant version against these recent Java versions, but they additionally have to set a system property while launching Ant to allow setting the security manager

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello ewh, Thank you for these experiments and reporting the results. This certainly helped me decide which way to go about it. When I had initially tried using "allow" as a Java class (as done in NetBeans), I was unsure if that would be the right way to go. It didn't feel clean and I thought

Re: JDK 20 EAb22, ZenGC EA builds, JavaFX 20 EAb5 and several heads-ups!

Hello David, We have been a bit slow recently in running the Ant testsuite and responding to the EA releases. I found some time today and triggered a run against the latest JDK 20 EA available at https://jdk.java.net/20/ which is (build 20-ea+27-2213). That has exposed a new failure in the ja

Re: Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Stefan, On 19/11/22 10:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-11-18, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On my personal TODO list there are a few minor things like Java 20 removing another target option that we may want to tell users about. Nothing of this is critical AFAIR and shouldn't hold up a relea

Release Ant 1.10.13?

Hello everyone, We last released Ant more than a year back. During that period we have had some good amount of bug fixes and changes that have gone in. Plus, Java 18 and beyond was released in the meantime where setting the security manager isn't allowed by default (Ant sets it). Users can sti

Re: Message output level not public for Project class

A new method has been introduced on BuildLogger interface called getMessageOutputLevel() which will return the currently set level. This will be available in the next Ant release. -Jaikiran On 11/10/22 10:38 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should

Re: [VOTE] Release Iyv 2.5.1 Based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.1-bin.tar.gz. - Installed locally. - Ran  java -jar $IVY_HOME/ivy-2.5.1.jar -version (correct version reported) - Then built a few existing projects with this version and they passed - Checked some docs in the "doc" folder and they looked fine. -Jaikiran

Re: Message output level not public for Project class

With Ant 1.10.x version requiring Java 8, I think it should now be possible for us to add a new (default) method to the org.apache.tools.ant.BuildLogger interface to return the current set (or some default) log level. I will add something along these lines shortly. -Jaikiran On 11/10/22 10:26

Re: Migrate from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues

I agree with Stefan. GitHub has its own set of pleasant features but I don't think moving Ant's issue tracker to GitHub is necessary. I haven't been around in the Ant community since the beginning but for the past few years that I've been around, I don't think reporting issues in Bugzilla has

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Additionally, I ran the Ant testsuite on a macos setup locally with JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 by using --enable-preview. No issues were encountered in the testsuite. -Jaikiran On 16/06/22 7:11 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello David, We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Hello David, We ran the Ant testsuite against JDK 19 EA build 19-ea+26-2060 on a Linux system. No issues were found in this run https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/26/. -Jaikiran On 13/06/22 6:47 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Greetings! JDK 19

Re: synchronized and Loom

Hello Stefan, My personal opinion is that we continue with our release plans (whenever we do it) instead of waiting for completing these changes. The virtual threads feature is a preview feature in JDK 19, so I think as long as our tests pass and Ant is usable in Java 19 with --enable-preview,

Re: Please consider releasing Apache Ant 1.10.13?

Hello Simon, I do have it on my task list to do a release in the coming weeks. I don't have an exact date yet. One change that we did recently was to make Ant work out of the box (without setting any additional environment variable values or system properties) to make it work against Java 18

Re: JDK 19 - Virtual Threads Testing!

Hello David, I did a quick run of our Ant project testsuite against the Java 19 EA version (build 19-ea+23-1706). This round of testing did _not_ enable preview features and thus it didn't test virtual threads yet. I just wanted to make sure this EA version works fine without virtual threads

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant » Ant-Build-from-POMs #120

Hello Matt, That job keeps failing every other time. I haven't had a chance to understand why it fails nor do I know what that job is for. I think you can ignore that specific job failure since it's not your commits which is causing it. The only failure that looks related to the recent commi

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Jan, On 08/02/22 12:04 pm, Jan Lahoda wrote: On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 5:53 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Earl, On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote: How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to test their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Stefan, On 08/02/22 1:15 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2022-02-07, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So the launch scripts (the Linux one and the .bat for Windows one) have both been updated to set this system property only for Java 18 and 19. I expect this to be a temporary thing till the new API is

Re: Java 8 for Apache Ivy

+1. No objections. A while back I had thought of proposing this. The worry I had/have was that doing some of these refactoring might introduce hard to catch regressions in the core of Ivy itself (which I personally haven't fully had a grasp of yet). Having said that, targetting Ivy against Ja

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Earl, On 08/02/22 12:59 am, Earl Hood wrote: How exactly does setting the sysprop for only 18 and 19 allow folks to test their stuff? If Ant currently depends on the security manager to operate, why not set the sysprop regardless, then remove in future when a replacement API exists? Jav

Re: [ant] branch master updated: add java.security.manager=allow while launching against Java 19

Hello Stefan, I was planning to send out a mail about this change later tonight. But good you brought this up. To give some background, the security manager changes starting Java 18 make it such that setting of the security manager at runtime now throws an exception, which effectively fails al

Re: JDK 18 Rampdown Phase 2 & JDK 19 Early-Access Builds

Hello David, I ran the Java 18 build 18-ea+34-2083 and Java 19 build 19-ea+8-441 against our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup and we observed no regressions, except security manager exceptions. We had to do changes to our Ant launch command to get past the security manager runtime exceptions th

Re: [DISCUSS] JUnit 5 Customization

Hello Aleksei, On 22/12/21 7:59 pm, Aleksei Zotov wrote: Hi Ant Developers, I'm working on the migration of Apache Cassandra project from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 (CASSANDRA-16630 ) which turned out to be larger than I originally expected. At the

Re: JDK 18 Early-Access builds 23 are available

Hello David, Given the security manager changes in this JDK 18 EA build, a lot of our Ant tests have failed against this version. This was expected and we had anticipated this when the work on these changes had started in JDK. This will need changes in the Ant project to make it work starting

Re: Thank you! JDK 18 Early Access build 20 is now available

Hello Rory, I ran the JDK 18 EA (build 18-ea+20-1248) against our Ant testsuite on Linux and no issues were encountered: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/82/jdk_axis=jdk18_ea,label_exp=ubuntu/ -Jaikiran On 26/10/21 5:37 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi

Re: Need help with new versions in bugzilla for Ant

On 19/10/21 9:37 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-10-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? Done. Thank you Stefan. I don't think anybody else of the project team has e

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Ant 1.10.12 released

The Apache Ant Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.10.12. Apache Ant is a Java library and command-line tool that helps building software. The Apache Ant team currently maintains two lines of development. The 1.9.x releases require Java 5 at runtime and 1.10.x requires

Need help with new versions in bugzilla for Ant

Can someone with access to Bugzilla please create a new 1.10.12 product version and a new 1.10.13 milestone version, for Ant? I'm almost done with the rest of the release formalities and will send the release annonucement later today. -Jaikiran ---

Re: [RESULT] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

arten Op zondag 17 oktober 2021 09:02:30 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai : +1. - Used this version to build some of our internal projects. - Checked some random manuals. All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a new RC2 release candidate f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

+1. - Used this version to build some of our internal projects. - Checked some random manuals. All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 13/10/21 11:05 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2 on c

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC2

I've created a new RC2 release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC2 on commit: 4b420359942dfb1221f308d08f3648712fea9f83 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/   revision: 50387 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

51 pm, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Paul, On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote: I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional. I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine. Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous releases and they too c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

On 07/10/21 11:27 am, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: If the goal of 1.10.12 is to be compilable on Java 17, This 1.10.12 release of Ant (like our previous releases) is a bug fix release. Ant 1.10.x require a Java 8+ runtime. This release changes nothing on that front. One of the bug fixes in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

Hello Paul, On 05/10/21 2:27 pm, Paul King wrote: I was surprised to see binary jars in the src archives under lib/optional. I don't know the history, so perhaps it is fine. Thank you for testing this release. I had a look at our previous releases and they too contain the binary jars in the s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

I'll need one more PMC member's vote on this for me to move forward. Anyone have some time this week to test this? -Jaikiran On 03/10/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-30, Jaikiran Pai wrote: This release is mainly a bug fix release and the exact changes are note

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

+1 - Downloaded the .tar.gz binary - Checked the NOTICE file and some random manuals - Built internal projects using Java 8 and this version of Ant - Built some sample projects with Java 17 and this version Ant All looks fine. -Jaikiran On 30/09/21 8:28 am, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I&#x

[VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.12 based on RC1

I've created a release candidate for 1.10.12: git tag: ANT_1.10.12_RC1 on commit: cb7f242aa099c069bd75e6ee4d6e50b56fd73b71 tarballs: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/   revision: 50166 Maven artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheant-1051

Re: Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

On 28/09/21 12:55 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-26, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I was planning to initiate a release tonight, but trying to upgrade one of the optional dependencies has shown up some interesting issue in the maven ant task (which apparently has been EOLed[1]) that we use in

Re: Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

On 19/09/21 3:30 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-16, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-09-15, Jaikiran Pai wrote: I wanted to look into and sort out https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424 in this release too, but it looks like I may not be able to do that and I'm not sur

Release 1.10.12 of Ant?

Java 17 has been released yesterday. We have a relatively minor fix in javadoc task which affects Java 17 in cases where failonwarn=true. Should we consider releasing 1.10.12 of Ant in upcoming days to provide this fix and other fixes that we have done since 1.10.11 release? I wanted to look i

Re: Release Announcement: General Availability of Java 17 / JDK 17

Hello Rory, Congratulations on the Java 17 release. I've run Java 17 build 17+35-2724 and Java 18 build 18-ea+14-756 against our Ant testsuite on Linux and all tests have passed without issues: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/80/jdk_axis=jdk17_ea,la

Re: Upcoming Java 17 release will have an impact on our javadoc task

Hello Stefan, On 27/06/21 4:10 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-06-17, Jaikiran Pai wrote: So right now I don't have specific proposals for fixing this but just a note that we will have to look into this one for the upcoming JDK 17 release. I guess we can simply concatenate stder

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 23/08/21 9:17 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-23, Jaikiran Pai wrote: On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 19/08/21 3:23 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the SecurityManager if permissions have been defined. Where else do we use one? From

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions" type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager to allow users to configure the necessary security permissions

Re: Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

Hello Stefan, On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: On 2021-08-05, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Ant project will be impacted by this. Ant provides a "permissions" type[1] whose whole goal is to integrate with the Java SecurityManager to allow users to configure the necessary security p

Re: JDK 17 is now in the Release Candidate Phase

Hello Rory, I ran our Ant testsuite on a Linux setup against both Java 17 and Java 18 EA releases. No new issues noticed and things look fine. -Jaikiran On 07/08/21 8:23 pm, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, *Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are now in the Release Candidate Phase [1][

Impact of Java SecurityManager being deprecated for removal post Java 17

Hello everyone, Some of you might have been following the recent discussions in JDK where the SecurityManager and related APIs will be deprecated (for removal) starting the upcoming Java 17 release. To be clear, this change in Java will have no impact in terms of API usage in Java 17 (except f

Re: JDK 17 is now in Rampdown Phase Two

Hello Rory, We ran this against our Ant project and no new issues have been observed with both these JDK 17 and 18 EA builds. -Jaikiran On 16/07/21 12:51 am, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Stefan/Jaikiran, *Per the JDK 17 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase Two [1].* *Please advise if you find

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.9.15 based on RC1

+1. Downloaded .tar.gz binary. Checked some manuals and the NOTICE file. Used this version to build some of our internal projects. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 10/07/21 11:43 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've created a release candidate for 1.9.16: git tag: ANT_1.9.16_RC1 on c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ant 1.10.11 based on RC1

+1. Downloaded the .tar.gz binary, checked the NOTICE file, some manuals and built our internal projects using this new version. All went fine. -Jaikiran On 11/07/21 12:21 am, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all I've created a release candidate for 1.10.11: git tag: ANT_1.10.11_RC1 on c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AntUnit 1.4.1 based on RC1

+1. Did some basic verification: - Downloaded apache-ant-antunit-1.4.1-bin.tar.gz from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ant/antlibs/antunit/binaries/ - Extracted locally. Checked the NOTICE file. - Checked the WHATSNEW file. - Checked the docs/index.html - Checked that ant-antunit-1.

Re: new warnings produced by task under Open JDK 17-ea+28-2534

k Hillegas wrote: Thanks for that explanation, Jaikiran. On 6/27/21 8:29 PM, Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Rick, Thank you for this report. We have been watching this area and have been aware of this issue, including one other user report[1]. I'm just waiting for things to become a bit more clea

Re: new warnings produced by task under Open JDK 17-ea+28-2534

Hello Rick, Thank you for this report. We have been watching this area and have been aware of this issue, including one other user report[1]. I'm just waiting for things to become a bit more clear on this front before coming up with any proposal in the Ant project on how to deal with this. Cl

Re: JDK 17 Early Access build 28 & JDK 18 build 3 are available

Hello Rory, I ran JDK 17 EA (build 17-ea+28-2534) against our Ant testsuite on a linux setup and apart from the one failure[1] that is a result on the intentional change in javadoc tool[2], rest all tests passed fine. We (the Ant project) will sort out the javadoc issue in the coming weeks.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >