Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-31 Thread Gus Heck
I've read this thread a bit, but maybe not completely. I'm not sure I understand, but I think you are talking about combining mappers and filesets such that filesets can perform mapping functions. It has been agreed that this would require modification of many tasks that use filesets so why

RE: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-30 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 12:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic? On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but a or a is essentially a collection of data > files

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but a or a is essentially a collection of data > files with names Not in the case of . > (isn't logically an ordered ?). No. A is a set of names of existing files rooted in the same base directory. There are lots of tasks

RE: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
ually) -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic? On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is easy. already supports p

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it is easy. already supports part of it with > . Sure, but not for "plain" filesets. > will delete the original file. I.e. treat it like any fileset. > and others will copy or see the files with new names. I.e. has

RE: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
: Any chance for fileset arithmetic? On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I actually meant that mappers inside filesets would rename files > in the filesets. I'm still not sure I understand it. > I need something like: > > >

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I actually meant that mappers inside filesets would rename files > in the filesets. I'm still not sure I understand it. > I need something like: > > > Say you have build/docs/index.html. Do you expect the invocation

RE: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
(GMT-8 usually) -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic? On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be possib

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be possible to add fileset joining, subtraction, This is already possible, if you use selectors instead of include/exclude children. > file renaming/mapping Every time anybody proposes to allow nested s in , they s

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-25 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
From: "Alexey Solofnenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 5:19 PM > Without basic fileset operations I have to use to prepare different > images. Would it be possible to add fileset joining, subtraction, file > renaming/mapping, and selectors into fileset itself? Currently only

Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-25 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
Hello, Without basic fileset operations I have to use to prepare different images. Would it be possible to add fileset joining, subtraction, file renaming/mapping, and selectors into fileset itself? Currently only s support some of the mapping functionality. Sincerely, Alexey Solofnenko. -