Thanks Matt. Sorry folks. Another RTFM moment. :n(
Phil
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 14:49, Matt Benson wrote:
> This is really more of a user question. Anyway, per
> the manual, if you use nested mappers of any type the
> element will behave as a composite mapper,
> which unions any child mapper ele
This is really more of a user question. Anyway, per
the manual, if you use nested mappers of any type the
element will behave as a composite mapper,
which unions any child mapper elements. So the answer
is you would nest this way for a composite:
and this way for a chained ma
I noticed that Ant 1.6.x has added composite mapper and chained mapper
options as implementations of the FileNameMapper.
I can't see how to use these with the copy task since copy seems to only
support the "mapper" nested element and the latter doesn't list
"composite" and "chained" as appropriate
