On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Kev Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Antlib idea seems to me to be the best way of refactoring Ant
into a component based system where individual tasks can be released
without having to release a new version of Ant (the main purpose of
Antlibs was this as far as I'm
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/21/05, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-release a separate ant-execution library, at exactly the same
frequency as ant point releases.
I'm not sure that this is required. Surely an Ant release can just
use the last
Kev Jackson wrote:
Here's my non-committer 2pennies worth...
I think it would be beneficial to refactor Ant for some of the
commons-libs (commons-exec for example), I also think it'd be useful for
Ant 1.7 to splitoff as many tasks as possible into antlibs. The Antlib
idea seems to me to be
On 9/21/05, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, we can discuss it :)
I do actually agree that execution and JAR files ought to be structured
so that they can be reused. The code in there is some of the best
debugged stuff out there in Java for doing both.
Ok - good that we agree on
Brett Porter wrote:
On 9/21/05, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, we can discuss it :)
I do actually agree that execution and JAR files ought to be structured
so that they can be reused. The code in there is some of the best
debugged stuff out there in Java for doing both.
Ok -
Hi,
I'm basically looking for some opportunities for sibling Apache
communities to work together in an area we have some overlap, and
wanted to see what thoughts the Ant community had on this. I've
invited folks on the Maven lists to follow this thread here too, so if
you see some strange faces -
Here's my non-committer 2pennies worth...
I think it would be beneficial to refactor Ant for some of the
commons-libs (commons-exec for example), I also think it'd be useful for
Ant 1.7 to splitoff as many tasks as possible into antlibs. The Antlib
idea seems to me to be the best way of
