Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition against more than one target of the same name in the
same build script seems logical, but it impedes a form of reuse that I
think would be very handy to use.
If you include one build file within another (using ENTITY
Title: AW: Overridable targets?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 6. Juni 2003 16:54
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Overridable targets?
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition
something.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Ant Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Overridable targets?
I have implemented this in ant 1.5.1 and 1.5.3 and have been using for
multiple projects without issue. I
documents, but in reality overridable
targets would have made our life allot easier.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 June 2003 17:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Overridable targets?
We are currently using a modified version of ant
Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54:
Here is a radical idea that I'd like to kick around a little.
The prohibition against more than one target of the same name in the
same build script seems logical, but it impedes a form of reuse that I
think would be very handy to use.
It is already done
: Re: Overridable targets?
...
It is already done in the import task that is in CVS for Ant 1.6.
So no more entity includes but a task to include other buildfiles, also
with target override, and super target calling, so you can basically
extend the imported target
Thanks. I knew it was a feasible idea.
-Original Message-
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overridable targets?
Steve Cohen wrote, On 06/06/2003 16.54:
Here is a radical idea that I'd like
