RE: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-31 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > What I'd like from autocreated stuff is > > -readable docs > > -ability to include samples > > -linking to nested types > > -index docs > > -ease of use by other projects that create ant tasks. > > > > we are not there -yet. > > Dont forget a

AW: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-31 Thread Jan . Materne
> Erik Hatcher wrote: > > Keep us posted on what you come up with! I created > proposal/xdocs to > > generate the task reference appendix in JDwA, and tossed it > out there as > > a possible way to document tasks/types in the hopes it > would get more > > attention that it has. I believe St

Re: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-30 Thread Steve Loughran
Erik Hatcher wrote: Keep us posted on what you come up with! I created proposal/xdocs to generate the task reference appendix in JDwA, and tossed it out there as a possible way to document tasks/types in the hopes it would get more attention that it has. I believe Steve has used it to generate

RE: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-23 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dominique Devienne wrote: > >But reinventing the wheel or not, the fact remains that the additional > >accessors I'm requesting in IntrospectionHelper are needed for any > >solution that doesn't want to re-code the attribute/nested-element logic > >i

Re: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-17 Thread Peter Reilly
Dominique Devienne wrote: But reinventing the wheel or not, the fact remains that the additional accessors I'm requesting in IntrospectionHelper are needed for any solution that doesn't want to re-code the attribute/nested-element logic in reverse, or the whole logic of the add[Configured](Class) e

Re: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Aug 17, 2004, at 11:51 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant tasks/types. Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation gen

RE: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-17 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant tasks/types. > Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation > generation was done? How much of what you're d

Re: Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-17 Thread Erik Hatcher
Dominique, Have you looked deep into proposal/xdocs to see how its documentation generation was done? How much of what you're doing is reinventing what was done there? Sounds almost identical. I leveraged IntrospectionHelper as well as the XDoclet object model to get all the info I needed.

Request for more access to IntrospectionHelper-stored info

2004-08-17 Thread Dominique Devienne
I'm working on a combination task/doclet to document Ant tasks/types. Currently, Ant gives access to enumerations of names for attributes and nested elements for a given type thru IntrospectionHelper, and once one has a name, the Java Class for that attribute/nested-element, but on the other hand