I agree with Peter.
I think it's important that older 3th party tasks keep working with 1.x
releases of Ant.
Maarten
From: Peter Reilly
To: Ant Developers List ; gudnabr...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: depreca
ie
>>> de ceci est interdite. Ce message sert à l'information seulement et n'aura
>>> pas n'importe quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email
>>> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
>>> aucune
email
>> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
>> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>>
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:52:19 -0500
>>> Subject: deprecations
>>>
onné que les email
> peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter
> aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni.
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:52:19 -0500
>> Subject: deprecations
>> From: gudnabr...@gmail.com
>> To: dev@ant.apache.or
On 08/20/2012 01:52 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
There are lots of methods in Ant's source that have been deprecated since e.g.
v1.6. Does anyone object to removing deprecated methods for Ant 1.9?
I think OK so long as you are talking about members in the Java API - I guess
we are still keeping co
bilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:52:19 -0500
> Subject: deprecations
> From: gudnabr...@gmail.com
> To: dev@ant.apache.org
>
> Hi gang,
> There are lots of methods in Ant's source that have been deprecated
> since e.g. v1.6. Does
Hi gang,
There are lots of methods in Ant's source that have been deprecated
since e.g. v1.6. Does anyone object to removing deprecated methods
for Ant 1.9?
Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For add
