+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:18:41 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Merge Ivy and Ant Dev Lists
Hi,
it seemed as if the discussion favored a joined mailing lists of Anf
(and antlibs)
+1 for asking people to re-subscribe
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 10:56:59 AM
Subject: Re: ivy-dev list migration
On Dec 5, 2007 8:55 AM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm leaning
+1 for updating makepom and merging svn revision r601489 into this beta release.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 8:53:30 PM
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
> -Original Message--
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 7:34:11 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Ivy 2.0.0-beta1 (second attempt)
I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta1
You can download it from this URL
Hi,
The LatestConflictManagerTest fails on my fresh copy of svn trunk. However, it
doesn't fail on gump. Anyone an idea?
I get the following exception when running in Eclipse (all tests fail with
similar error, except the first one)
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: invalid micro ivy format:
t for the pattern, are you sure you
cleaned your build before running (you say you have a fresh copy, so I
don't see how it cold be an issue... but anyway).
Xavier
> -Original Message-
> From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:
I've found it. The Pattern.toString() method doesn't return the String pattern
on JDK 1.4. Maybe this is different on JDK 1.5+?
Maarten
- Original Message ----
From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2007 11:37:2
ferent, it works :-). But the problem
is only for tests, so we know we have one test failing with jdk 1.4 for
2.0 beta 1, doesn't sound like a showstopper issue for me.
Xavier
> -Original Message-----
> From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 200
I don't have Ant 1.7 and java 6 (I know: shame on me... *blush*)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2007 9:46:22 PM
Subject: RE: ivy.xsd outdated
> -Original Message-
> Fr
The ivy.xsd on the site is not up-to-date:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/schemas/ivy.xsd
(it doesn't support the global exclude element)
Can someone update this?
Maarten
Be a better friend, newshound, and
Hi,
In the ArtifactRevisionId.newInstance(...) methods, the extra attributes of the
module are automatically added to the extra attributes of the module artifacts.
Any idea what could be the reason for this?
Maarten
_
k it is useful to use them in patterns. Try removing this piece
> of code and see if a test case is failing, I wouldn't be surprised
we
> have a test case for that.
>
> Xavier
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> &g
Why not delay the circular dependency check untill the resolve is finished?
Maybe the module causing the circular dependency gets evicted so there might be
no problem at all?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Dec
eful to use them in patterns. Try removing this piece
of code and see if a test case is failing, I wouldn't be surprised we
have a test case for that.
Xavier
> -Original Message-----
> From: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 4:41 PM
>
I didn't detect this error because I'm running tests with Java 1.4 where the
validation of Ivy files doesn't work because the standard XML parser doesn't
support XML Schema validation. I've added Xerces to the test classpath to avoid
this in the future, I hope it won't give problems with more re
It seems there is a trick to view the site before it has being rsync'ed by
using a HTTP proxy:
http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 6:45:27 PM
Subject: Re:
The download page is working now :-)
I've played a bit with the download.cgi file, but I don't know what was the
magical change that made things work, maybe someone else did a change as well???
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Se
List
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 11:02:01 AM
Subject: Re: ivy download page
On Dec 14, 2007 10:58 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The download page is working now :-)
> I've played a bit with the download.cgi file, but I don't know what
was
> t
I'd prefer having the site in SVN too...
btw, the rights on the /www/ant.apache.org/ivy directory aren't correct, I
can't create new files in it. Could you update that?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Saturday, December 15
I receive the following error when compiling the latest Ivy sources from SVN.
Xavier: could this be introduced somewhere with your recent changes?
java.lang.RuntimeException: problem during retrieve of org.apache.ivy#ivy:
java.lang.ClassCastException
at
org.apache.ivy.core.retrieve.Retr
Xavier,
why did you change the way the attributes are processed in the
XmlSettingsParser class?
For instance, before your commit, it was like this:
String propFilePath = ivy.substitute((String) attributes.get("file"));
After your commit, it is like this:
String propFilePath = (String) attributes
Strange,
I tested it with a sun jdk 1.4.2 (I can't check the patch level from here) and
it was working ok, so I assumed it would work for all sun 1.4.2 VM's :-(
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:
0, 2008 12:43 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2008 12:14 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Strange,
> > I tested it with a sun jdk 1.4.2 (I can't check the patch level
from
> > here) and it was worki
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:35:49 AM
Subject: [VOTE] add Nicolas Lalevée as committer
Hi All,
Nicolas Lalevée has contributed a lot of patches to Ivy and IvyDE [1 to 10],
and has bee
This should be fixed before we release the new beta
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Patrick Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:27:26 PM
Subject: Ivy build broken on Java 1.4
As of r629224 the Ivy build appears broken when using JDK
I've just committed a fix, it should be ok now.
Thanks for reporting.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Patrick Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 10:27:26 PM
Subject: Ivy build broken on Java 1.4
As of r629224 the Ivy build appears bro
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:15:13 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2.
Compared to the first attempt,
Hi,
after my changes to fix IVY-716, the following methods on DependencyResolver
are no longer used:
String[] listTokenValues(String token, Map otherTokenValues);
OrganisationEntry[] listOrganisations();
ModuleEntry[] listModules(OrganisationEntry org);
RevisionEntry[] listRevisions(ModuleEntry
Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use the
settingsId attribute instead?
instead of
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:31:42 PM
Subject: Ivy settings id (was Re:
a settingsRef should use ivy:configure in BC mode),
> it has a drawback. If the user forget to put its settingsRef, he will
> not receive any error message, the code will run with the default
> settings, even if an other settings is defined. This lead to problem
> difficult to
I like the enumeration syntax, like descriptor="required | otpional", it's much
more readable and it will probably allow us to have less attributes on some of
the tasks.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Saturday, March 29,
It was hardcoded to 0600 in Scp.java before I made this change. To keep it BC,
I defaulted it to the same value. As far as I could see, the umask wasn't used.
Since this attribute is only used for publishing modules, not for module
retrieval, I think we should at least keep "publish" in the attr
Btw, in the manual for chmod, they use the "mode" terminology for this kind of
information.
Maarten
- Original Message ----
From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2008 9:19:57 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r644541 - in /an
it: r644541 - in /ant/ivy/core/trunk: CHANGES.txt
doc/resolver/ssh.html src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/ssh/Scp.java
src/java/org/apache/ivy/plugins/repository/ssh/SshRepository.java
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Btw, in the manua
Are we going to use confluence as a replacement for our current website
(http://ant.apache.org/ivy), or only as a replacement for our wiki
(http://wiki.apache.org/ivy/) ?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Paul King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, April 23,
MAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le mercredi 23 avril 2008, Maarten Coene a écrit :
> > Are we going to use confluence as a replacement for our current website
> > (http://ant.apache.org/ivy), or only as a replacement for our wiki
> > (http://wiki.apache.org/ivy/) ?
>
> The vo
+1 for an IvyDE release.
I'd prefer a beta release instead of an alpha release though...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:19:40 PM
Subject: Re: Releasing IvyDE
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Nicolas
Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do for
the Ivy files?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 8:51:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Ivy] How to add a new option to ivy settings
As
2008/5/29 Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Why not always use the server timestamp for the artifacts as we already do
>> for the Ivy files?
>
> Why not, indeed, I see no spe
I suggest you do the following:
1. create a JIRA issue for this
2. modify BasicURLHandler.java to always set the modification date on the
downloaded file
3. check if this change has the effect you wanted
4. if test results are ok, attach a patch to your JIRA issue for
BasicURLHandler.java
Maar
I've installed it using the update site on my Eclipse 3.4 without a problem.
I've only used it for some very basic things and I didn't had any problem so
far
So, here is my +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Sunda
Yes,
I changed that recently. IvyAntSettings is now a DataType again...
They should use the IvyConfigure task instead.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:37:03 AM
Subject: Ivy svn breaks ant-contrib
Just a wild guess, but maybe you could use IvyAntSettings again (like your
original code was), but instead of calling the execute method you can register
it yourself as Reference in the Project, something like:
IvyAntSettings settings = new IvyAntSettings();
settings.setXXX...
getProject().addRe
For some reason, not all junit tests were executed when running "ant test".
I've changed this, but now the ChainResolverTest fails (something with the
cache?).
I don't know if we broke something or if the test is wrong. I don't see it at
the moment...
regards,
Maarten
--
I agree,
The goal is to have one single instance of HttpClient here to be able to reuse
the connections.
At the moment, the HttpClientHandler isn't a singleton, so the easiest way for
me was to make it static.
But maybe we can wait to see if the change solves the problem. If it doesn't,
we can
Xavier,
I've looked at the code, and I can't remember writing such a thing and I can't
remember using it.
The svn history logs indicates I've added the code, so I can only think of 3
options:
- there must be something wrong with my memory
- there went something wrong importing the svn history f
I only have a failing ChainResolverTest.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 6:44:35 PM
Subject: Re: Ivy Broken unit test
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I
Xavier,
I think this is an excellent idea :-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 1:04:45 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r683187 -
/ant/ivy/core/trunk/test/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/IvyTaskTest.java
On
The tests are still running ok for me on Windows
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 11:38:57 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r683187 -
/ant/ivy/core/trunk/test/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/IvyTaskTest.java
Xavier,
you've merged that fix into the 2.0.x branch. Does this mean it will be
included in the 2.0.0 final release?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:03:06 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.
+1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:56:25 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 Release
I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-rc1
You can download it from this URL:
http://people.apache
If you want this issue to be fixed, please do
- vote for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-736, or
- attach a patch to this issue, or
- attach a junit test to this issue, or
- do all of the things above :-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: "Wardrip, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
Indeed, and an error (or warning) could be thrown if you Ivy module defines an
artifact having a different name than the module name.
I think there was a JIRA issue as well for supporting more than 1 artifact...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant
I've applied your patches into SVN and the 2.0.x branch.
They won't be included into RC1 because we already created the release, the RC1
announcement will be sent very soon...
If we will create a RC2 is not certain at the moment and it will be discussed
later on this mailing list.
Maarten
-
Looks fine to me...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:42:17 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 announcement
Hi,
The vote for Ivy 2.0.0-rc1 is now over (I'll send another e-mail with the
resul
I'm a bit confused here, you talk about the SFTP resolver, but your log shows
only http URLs?
Could you try it again with Ivy RC1, it contains some improvements for such
kind of urls with "strange" characters.
oh and please post such kind of questions to the ivy-user mailinglist in the
future..
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Please open a new Ivy JIRA issue.
I don't think we should open an issue for that. Well, maybe we can open an
issue for consistency, but mark it as invalid. Indeed I don't think
accepting something which is
erty
>>> -
>>>
>>> Key: IVYDE-51
>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-51
>>> Project: IvyDE
>>>Issue Type: Improvement
>>>Compo
Hi,
Ivy-2.0.0-RC1 is out for some time now. What will be the next step?
- create a new RC2 release containing some (or all) of the bugfixes which have
been committed into SVN trunk and maybe some open issues which aren't fixed yet
- create a 2.0.0 final release based on RC1
I'm in favor for a n
We are also still using JDK1.4.
We"ll probably upgrade to Java 6 next year after we have solved some
incompatibilities between JDK1.4 and JDK6
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 5:02:40 PM
Subjec
y fail if the parent POM cannot be found
Are there other open issues that should make it into RC2?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 10:39:29 AM
Subject: Re: Next step in Ivy 2.0 relea
Please do, I'll try to make a new release within the next couple of days...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:23:40 AM
Subject: Re: Next step in Ivy 2.0 release process
Sorry for the late re
Hi all,
I've started creating Ivy 2.0.0 RC2 a couple of days ago, but I have some delay
:-(
I'm almost finished I think, just need to create the eclipse bundle before I
start a vote.
Because I don't have time today and tomorrow to finish it, I'll post the
download link now so you could already
this release is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
The bundle version is 2.0.0.cr2.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene,
Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 release manager
lease
I am not able to verify the signed artifacts as I don't have your
public key, and I cannot find it in the ant KEYS file
(http://www.apache.org/dist/ant/KEYS
).
Have you published it somewhere else ?
Though every else worked fine for me for this release.
Nicolas
Le 28 oct. 08 à 23:53,
Almost forgot to vote myself, so here is mine +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ant-dev
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:53:50 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 Release
I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0
You can do
The vote is over for the Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 release. With 4 binding +1, the vote has
passed.
I'll proceed to make the release official in the coming days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
I've committed the Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 website in svn:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/site/target/
When I want to update it in /www/ant.apache.org/ivy I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /www/ant.apache.org/ivy]$ svn up
svn: Can't open file 'history/trunk/settings/.svn/lock': Permiss
:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY
Download the 2.0.0-rc2 release files at:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
More information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene (2.0.0-rc2 release manager
that would be cool indeed...
But I think we can release Ivy-2.0 final within 2 or 3 weeks if no serious bugs
are reported against RC2.
Maybe we should only announce the final release on ant.apache.org ?
WDYT?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sounds good to me
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:15:48 PM
Subject: IvyDE 2.0 roadmap
I would like to discuss about the next release of IvyDE.
The last release of IvyDE was made 4 months
I'm getting an error when trying to update the already installed IvyDE plugin.
I'm using Eclipse 3.4.0 and tried both
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/staging/updatesite and
http://people.apache.org/~hibou/test-updatesite/
This is the information I could find in the Eclipse .log file
!ENTRY org.
+1
I did some basic testing with Eclipse 3.5M3 and everything seems to work fine
:-)
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 10:17:00 AM
Subject: [VOTE] IvyDE 2.0.0.beta1 Release - Take 2
I have bui
Ivy 2.0.0 RC2 is out for some time now. I think that none of the reported
issues agains RC2 are critical enough to block a 2.0.0 final release.
However, I would like to include the following trivial changes in the 2.0.0
final release (without making a new RC3 release):
- https://issues.apache.or
Yes,
I'll do the merge when I'm finished with the 2.0.0 release...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Gilles Scokart
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 10:33:14 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r727546 -
/ant/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0/build-release.xml
Shouldn't this be
Yes,
I was working on it untill I got the flue and after that I just didn't find the
time to continue the work.
But I hope I can finish it this week so we can start the vote.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: "Scheper, Erik-Berndt"
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 20
I'm not convinced that this is the proper way to solve your problem.
If they are not conflicts, they shouldn't get logged as conflict. Could you
give us more info and an example of your log?
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Robey Pointer
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Friday, January 2
is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene, Ivy 2.0.0 release manager
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
, January 7, 2009 5:29:01 AM
Subject: Re: patch (ivy): log conflict results at verbose
On 6 Jan 2009, at 12:14, Maarten Coene wrote:
> I'm not convinced that this is the proper way to solve your problem.
> If they are not conflicts, they shouldn't get logged as conflict. Could you
> gi
the bundle version has to be '2.0.0.final'.
I think the release should be rebuild with the correct version.
Nicolas
Le 8 janv. 09 à 00:15, Maarten Coene a écrit :
> I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0
>
> You can download it from this URL:
> http://people.apache.or
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/m2-staging-repo/
A staging eclipse update site with this release is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene, Ivy 2.0.0 relea
Since there are only 2 binding votes so far, here is my +1
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene
To: ant-dev
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 11:51:17 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0 Release (2nd attempt)
I have built a new release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0.
The only difference
The vote has ended for the Ivy 2.0.0 release.
With 3 binding +1 and no vetoes, the release is accepted.
I'll finish the release process within the next couple of days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@
can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maarten Coene
==
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
It's not a synchronization problem, I think I did something wrong uploading the
site, but I don't know how to fix it (yet)...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: "Scheper, Erik-Berndt"
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:26:34 AM
Subject: [ivy] javascript syntax er
te to this new version.
Issues should be reported to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY
Download the 2.0.0 release at:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/download.cgi
More information can be found on the Ivy website:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/
Regards,
Maa
The site should be ok now
Maarten
- Original Message
From: "Scheper, Erik-Berndt"
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:26:34 AM
Subject: [ivy] javascript syntax error upon loading ivy home page
Hi,
When I load the ivy home page (http://ant.apache.org/ivy) I get
How do I mention the Ivy 2.0.0 release on the ant homepage?
I guess I have to add it to
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/antnews.xml ?
But what do I have to do next?
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
to add more I think ;)
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: Maarten Coene [mailto:maarten_co...@yahoo.com]
>Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2009 00:08
>An: ant-dev
>Betreff: Announcing Ivy 2.0.0 release on Ant homepage
>
>How do I mention the Ivy 2.0.0 release on the ant home
I'm fine with your change, I don't think you need a vote for it.
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Lalevée
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2009 6:41:13 PM
Subject: Should I open a vote ? (Re: svn commit: r740252 - in
/ant/ivy/updatesite/trunk/dist: ./ featu
I don't know about vfs, but Ivy doesn't fail any longer if you have
httpclient-2.x in your classpath.
In that situation, Ivy will use the default JDK URL classes...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Hans Dockter
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:24:30 PM
S
Creating a 2.0.1 release is ok for me. I'm willing to create the release if
no-one else volunteers...
I've taken a quick look at the changes in JIRA, I think IVY-970 contains the
biggest change, but I think we can include it in the new release (or is it too
risky?)
And maybe we should also try
Hi,
I would like to change the Ivy retrieve behaviour regarding conflict handling
when multiple artifacts are retrieved to the same file.
At the moment, Ivy has some kind of retrieve-conflict-manager which selects the
"best" artifact, based on the revision of the conflicting modules.
This doesn
e conflict management strategy, or at least to have the option to use
the current behaviour (simple messages) when needed.
Xavier
>
> I'm also wondering if it is not possible to have warning in the retrieve
> task when some kind of patterns are used.
>
> Gilles Scokart
>
I've updated the RetrieveEngine to throw an error if multiple artifacts of the
same module are mapped to the same filename.
The behaviour when multiple artifacts of different modules are mapped to the
same filename hasn't been changed.
Could you review this change and are you ok to include that
Hi all,
it's time to make a new Ivy release.
I volunteer to be release manager, but we should discuss the following first:
- what will be the new Ivy version: 2.0.1 or 2.1.0
- what changes will we include in this new release?
- will we create a release candidate first?
My answers to these ques
PM
Subject: Re: New Ivy release
Gilles Scokart
2009/3/17 Maarten Coene
>
> Hi all,
>
> it's time to make a new Ivy release.
> I volunteer to be release manager, but we should discuss the following
> first:
Cool, thanks,
>
>
> - what will be the new Ivy versio
here:
http://people.apache.org/~maartenc/updatesite-staging/
Do you vote for the release of these binaries?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Maarten Coene,
Ivy 2.1.0-rc1 release manager
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
FYI, the release notes and changes of this release can be seen here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/branches/2.1.x/RELEASE_NOTES
These release notes are also included in the binaries...
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Maarten Coene
To: ant-dev
Sent: Thursday
Hi all,
With 4 binding +1 and 1 non binding, I'm pleased to announce that this vote has
passed successfully.
I'll continue with the release process within the next couple of days.
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
