The ASF board has accepted the resolution to move to the attic.
The process is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ATTIC/issues/ATTIC-215
Andy
On 21/05/2023 15:08, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Development and maintenance of Any23 is not happening. The last
(non-dependabot related!) commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne closed ANY23-613.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Ignore
> --
>
> Key: ANY23-613
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated ANY23-613:
Description: (was: Please delete
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-612 and remove
Andy Seaborne created ANY23-613:
---
Summary: JIRA spam - ANY23
Key: ANY23-613
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-613
Project: Apache Any23
Issue Type: Task
Reporter
Development and maintenance of Any23 is not happening. The last
(non-dependabot related!) commit was Apr 12, 2022
The board asked for a roll-call and got the minimum of three responses
for PMC members watching the project.
However, maintenance of keeping the code up-to-date with updates
I watch the project as and when I can, and will check the release
process for a VOTE.
I have not been active in the development.
Andy
On 19/01/2023 02:10, Willem Jiang wrote:
Hi,
There has been no development activity on this project for more than 6
months. The PMC failed to submit
On 19/07/2022 11:06, Andy Seaborne wrote:
I've asked infra to delete the user accounts of the JIRA spam.
INFRA-23490
Andy
Cleaned by INFRA.
I've asked infra to delete the user accounts of the JIRA spam.
INFRA-23490
Andy
JIRA deleted and user blocked by INFRA (the process to get that done is
to put in a JIRA ticket).
My +1 (binding)
Lewis - great work!
Andy
On 21/02/2022 19:16, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi,
Please VOTE on the release candidate for Apache Any23 2.7.
Note, this release candidate requires JDK11 to build and run.
We solved 18 issues:
((
my vote went to users@
Replying on the dev@ this time:
))
+1 (binding)
Built from src (inc RAT checks)
Built from git commit
asc verified
sha512 verified
Andy
Thank you to Lewis for the work he puts into any23.
On 04/11/2021 05:10, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi user@ and dev@,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17324259#comment-17324259
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on ANY23-371 at 4/17/21, 1:43 PM:
---
Any reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17324259#comment-17324259
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on ANY23-371 at 4/17/21, 12:47 PM:
Any reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17324259#comment-17324259
]
Andy Seaborne commented on ANY23-371:
-
Any reason not to use classpath feature that "*" is i
+1
Checked:
Signature - yes.
Checksum - yes.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/any23/2.4/apache-any23-2.4-src.zip
- "mvn clean install" works.
Commit agrees with the src.
Andy
On 21/09/2020 04:14, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi,
Please VOTE on the release candidate for Apache
Sorry for being behind the curve but where is the release? ie. *the*
file that ends up in https://www.apache.org/dist/any23
(which is https://downloads.apache.org/any23/2.3/).
On 21/09/2020 04:14, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi,
Please VOTE on the release candidate for Apache Any23 2.4
We
dy
On 30/01/2019 10:13, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 30/01/2019 10:00, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c1969d6a1f27b5c68b345651390333d63885afdca43d89fa80ee@%3Cdev.any23.apache.org%3E
Result:
+6 votes from the PMC
+1 community vote
No community dissent.
Andy Seaborne created ANY23-423:
---
Summary: Update POM for the move to gitbox.
Key: ANY23-423
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-423
Project: Apache Any23
Issue Type: Task
On 30/01/2019 10:00, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c1969d6a1f27b5c68b345651390333d63885afdca43d89fa80ee@%3Cdev.any23.apache.org%3E
Result:
+6 votes from the PMC
+1 community vote
No community dissent.
The VOTE passes.
I'll raise the INFRA
Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c1969d6a1f27b5c68b345651390333d63885afdca43d89fa80ee@%3Cdev.any23.apache.org%3E
Result:
+6 votes from the PMC
+1 community vote
No community dissent.
The VOTE passes.
I'll raise the INFRA ticket.
Andy
On 08/12/2018 20:36, lewis john
+1
Either gitbox.apache.org or github.
Andy
On 08/12/2018 20:36, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
dev@,
As per Daniel Gruno's NOTICE [0], all https://git-wip-us.apache.org
repositories will be moved to the new gitbox service which includes direct
write access on github as well as the standard
Lewis - thank you for moving this on.
I had two other comments on the RC1 vote:
* There are two different apache-any23-2.2-src.zip files.
* There are no md5 for the proposed dist/any23
The first about finding the one-true source code.
The second is a requirement of the ASF release process to
Sorry : -1 : there are problems with the source code.
* There are two different apache-any23-2.2-src.zip files.
* There are no md5 for the proposed dist/any23
* The build depends on SNAPSHOTs
== 2 different apache-any23-2.2-src.zip
I can't get things to agree:
Jacek,
Great - with this, would you be able to vote +1 on the release? At the
moment, the release has 2 +1.
Andy
On 31/10/17 09:47, Jacek Grzebyta wrote:
Hi Andy,
Sure. Especially I have some question to that PR.
Regards,
Jacek
On 27 October 2017 at 20:37, Andy Seaborne
+1 (binding)
The checksums are right and the 2.0 format ones also can't be
automatically checked with std linux tools.
Andy
On 24/10/17 12:16, Andy Seaborne wrote:
with comments:
On 19/10/17 21:39, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Andy and dev@,
Sorry i complete forgot about
pache.org> wrote:
From: Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
To: dev@any23.apache.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:03:47 +0100
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Any23 2.1 RC#1
Lewis - Thanks.
To the other question - what about the SHA1 and MD5 checksums?
Andy
he.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums
Andy
PS with Java9 (openjdk-9), the build fails.
[INFO] Running org.apache.any23.rdf.RDFUtilsTest
with stacktraces then it's downhill from there.
Quite old (2011-08)
org.apache
apache
10
On 15/09/17 11:34, And
Lewis - Thanks.
To the other question - what about the SHA1 and MD5 checksums?
Andy
On 19/09/17 20:33, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Folks,
@Andy,
Thanks for pointing this out, it is a shortcoming in my VOTE email.
The actual proposed release artifacts ca be located at
Hi,
A few problems getting material to check:
Apache releases source code. Where the source code to check?!
It's findable but a link to a specific set of bytes in the message would
be better.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/any23/2.1/apache-any23-2.1-src.zip
which will be there
+1 (binding)
Andy
- signature and hashes fine, KEYS file.
Signatures are good.
SHA1, MD5
- LICENSEs are OK
- NOTICE
- All ASF files have headers
Ran RAT.
Two files failed the RAT check; neither are critical. See below.
- No unexpected binary files
None found.
- Can compile from source
Lewis,
Can anyone else please verify what results they get?
java7 vs java8.
With java8 it builds, if you skip tests.
With java7 it builds and the test runs.
If the release announcement explain this situation then I'm +1 on this
release.
(I have some mutters about the whole tone of
A problem - formal source does not build as per the README instructions.
Presumably a README failure.
What's the build magic?
On 17/10/14 01:02, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Evening Folks,
I would like to open a VOTE on the following Apache Any23 1.1 release
candidate.
We solved a number of
W3C is creating a new working group to work on the validation of RDF
data. Shapes is code language for this.
Since an initial draft of a charter, there has a been a lot of
discussion of charter on the public W3C list:
public-rdf-sha...@w3.org
Is there a description of what is expected in a release review for Any23?
For Jena we have a list of checks:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JENA/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-VotingonaRelease
which we cribbed and tweaked during incubation from older and wiser
projects. Of
On 14/05/14 01:22, Peter Ansell wrote:
On 14 May 2014 09:05, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/05/14 19:33, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
...
Unclarity:
org.kohsuke.metainf-services is MIT license? (not that source code is
included so not a blocker for me) but I can't find
On 13/05/14 19:33, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Folks,
I apologize for taking a while to get this release candidate together. I
found some bus in Maven plugins
a number 57 bus?
and it took a while to debug where they
were and which aspects of the release procedure they affected. Now
+1
and thank you to Michele for being chair upto now and Lewis for stepping
forward at this point in the project.
Andy
On 18/03/14 15:39, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
+1
Tommaso
2014-03-18 16:38 GMT+01:00 Michele Mostarda michele.mosta...@gmail.com:
+1 for me.
Best
Michele
On 17
On 19/11/13 17:54, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Folks,
The Board meeting is tomorrow.
I would like to think that the report + fact that we released 0.9.0 is
sufficient enough for board approval.
I am keen to keep the momentum going w.r.t moving Any23 (or constituent,
useful pasts of it) in to
Hi Any23 PMC member,
On 29/10/13 06:31, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
Apologies if this is outside the current procedures (i admit i am not to
familiar)
my shallow understanding from following the mails a bit is that 0.9 might
be the last release of any23 before mergining it with Tika.
This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13690109#comment-13690109
]
Andy Seaborne commented on ANY23-160:
-
I patched the released Jena site yesterday
Lewis did a great job in pushing out a 0.8.0 RC.
So, as a probe into the PMC community, I'll ask ...
Is there enough energy currently in the PMC to do another 0.8.0 RC?
(who will find the time to vote if a release is cut?)
Andy
On 08/03/13 06:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi All,
Is it just me or do we need to report again?
I'm seeing board reports flying around and its got me thinking.
Best
Lewis
(rummages in the repos and archives)
Yes - there is a slot waiting for the project in the March board agenda.
(Any23
On 08/03/13 06:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi All,
Is it just me or do we need to report again?
I'm seeing board reports flying around and its got me thinking.
Best
Lewis
Good catch. Marvin did send a reminder :-) but then Marvin sends a lot
of reminders :-(, each several times, and
On 16/11/12 15:40, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi All,
I've recently been toiling over this thought at the back of my head.
Jena has legacy RDF parsers [0]... Any23 should aspire to provide and
therefore be the #1 RDF-based parsering library out there.
Jena has a large codebase, I just saw
44 matches
Mail list logo
