Would be glad to work on the documentation part!
Thanks,
Isha
-Original Message-
From: "Thomas Weise"
Sent: 4/8/2016 9:06 PM
To: "dev@apex.incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Support for Anti-Affinity in Apex
Generic affinity support in Apex is now official! Thanks Isha for patiently
stop sending these mails
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Timothy Farkas (JIRA)
wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223798#comment-15223798
> ]
>
> Timothy Farkas comment
stop sending therse mails
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:25 AM, David Yan (JIRA) wrote:
> David Yan created APEXCORE-423:
> --
>
> Summary: Fix style violations in Apex Core
> Key: APEXCORE-423
> URL: https://issues.apache.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233387#comment-15233387
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-423:
-
Github user tweise commented on the p
Github user tweise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/299#issuecomment-207718664
Tests pass locally. I have already merged the PR, but it still does not
show up in the mirror.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233376#comment-15233376
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-423:
-
Github user chandnisingh commented on
Github user chandnisingh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/299#issuecomment-207715549
@davidyan74 a test is failing. not related I guess?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-423.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Fix style violations in Apex Core
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise closed APEXCORE-207.
-
> Fix existing checkstyle violations
> --
>
> Key: A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-207:
--
Assignee: David Yan
> Fix existing checkstyle violations
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-207.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
> Fix existing checkstyle violations
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-421.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
ASF JIRA does not support smart commits, commi
Generic affinity support in Apex is now official! Thanks Isha for patiently
working through a lot of feedback, experimenting with all the different
scenarios and even implementing the blacklist based workaround for the CDH
scheduler issue.
It would be nice to add to the documentation also :-)
I c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-411.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Restart app without specifying app package
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233090#comment-15233090
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233065#comment-15233065
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on t
Github user davidyan74 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294#issuecomment-207630632
@tweise explanation is added in the comment.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233057#comment-15233057
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294#discussion_r59096681
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/client/StramAppLauncher.java ---
@@ -210,14 +239,67 @@ public StramAppLauncher(FileSystem fs,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233038#comment-15233038
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294#discussion_r59095579
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/client/StramAppLauncher.java ---
@@ -203,21 +231,75 @@ public StramAppLauncher(FileSystem fs,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-10.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Enable non-affinity of operators per node (not containers)
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15233006#comment-15233006
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXCORE-10:
--
[~icarkat...@gmail.com] thanks for completin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-10:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Enable non-affinity of operators per node (not containers)
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15232928#comment-15232928
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-10:
Github user asfgit closed the pull reque
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/250
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Isha Arkatkar created APEXCORE-425:
--
Summary: Validate dynamic update and dynamic partitioning
scenarios for Anti-affinity
Key: APEXCORE-425
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-425
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Isha Arkatkar resolved APEXCORE-196.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
> Input operator's current window id indicates time in the fu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Isha Arkatkar resolved APEXCORE-195.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
> Input operator never catches up after recovery
> --
Github user ishark commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/250#issuecomment-207551258
I have added reassigning of anti-affinity sets for containers in
assignContainers after repartitioning is done. But will create a follow up Jira
to validate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15232692#comment-15232692
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-10:
Github user ishark commented on the pull
Hello Team,
As we were talking about High Level api in another thread, here is a small
variation proposal for our existing apis,
Take look at the current code and the proposed code
Current Style
---
KafkaSinglePortStringInputOperator kafkaInput =
dag.addOperator("kafka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-92:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Blacklist problem nodes from future container requests
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Isha Arkatkar resolved APEXCORE-92.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Changes for this are already merged. Resolving the issue.
> Blacklist prob
Sebb created APEXCORE-424:
-
Summary: Please delete old releases from mirroring system
Key: APEXCORE-424
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-424
Project: Apache Apex Core
Issue Type: B
36 matches
Mail list logo
